AI in the Classroom with Irina Jurenka

The Impact of AI on Education: A Resilient Human Teacher?

As we sit down to discuss the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on education, it's clear that this is a space where people are very heavily invested. The educational system has been around for thousands of years and is a fundamental structure in our society, making it a challenging space to navigate.

The recent rapid transition of AI into the education sector has sparked concerns around the potential for cheating and dependence on technology. However, despite these fears, there has been something remarkably resilient about the idea of a human teacher. At its heart, this concept has remained immune to ebbs and flows of technology. We've had classrooms for almost as long as we've had civilizations, and it's undeniable that there are opportunities here too.

Imagine a classroom where each lesson is tailored to your individual pace of learning, where an AI tutor is available around the clock, and technology can predict where you're likely to get stuck before you do. Researchers at Google DeepMind have been grappling with both the opportunities and challenges of AI in education. Recently, they published a major paper on developing AI responsibly in this area.

One of the lead authors of this paper is Dr. Irina Jurenka, a research lead at Google DeepMind. Her background spans experimental psychology and computational neuroscience, and she has spent a decade within these walls asking questions like how do humans learn? Welcome to the podcast, Irina. This is a space where people are very heavily invested, does that make it quite a difficult space to navigate?

It does because if you think about it, education has been around for thousands of years, and it is a fundamental structure in our society. Every child is supposed to get educated. The educational systems have been around for a while; they're quite rigid, and they're very established. To come in and say, look, we have this amazing technology, and we're going to revolutionize everything and change everything, I think it's not going to work so easily.

We've seen this happen with technologies of the past. Like intelligent tutoring systems have existed for 50 plus years. A lot of investment and research has gone into them, but you could argue that the promise of that technology hasn't fully materialized. Or more recently, we had MOOCs, these massive open courses, and again, there was so much excitement about how we won't need traditional education anymore. You can just go online and learn anything you would ever want to learn.

And once again, when you actually look at who uses these systems, it's people who have already gone through traditional education. And typically, it's people trying to get their second Master's. It's definitely not the thing that came and broke the system. I guess maybe we shouldn't be trying to break the system. There is a lot of amazing stuff happening in traditional education.

It's not just about taking the knowledge from the teacher and distilling or drip feeding that into the student. It's about the social aspects of talking to your peers and learning together. It's about the teachers giving skills like how to be a global citizen, how to navigate, how to critically think, how to evaluate information. So there is so much more to the educational systems than just the knowledge that they give.

In our team, we're thinking about the new technology in terms of how can it work within the current system, and how can it add to it? This isn't starting with a brand-new blank sheet of paper and saying design an education system from scratch. It's like augmenting the one that exists.