The Power of Intel Core Series: A New Era of Computing

The latest Intel Core Series has officially launched, bringing with it a new era of computing that promises to deliver unparalleled performance and efficiency. The new series boasts a number of exciting features, including the XE core design, which is expected to provide significant improvements in terms of power consumption and cooling capabilities.

In real-world testing, we can expect the Intel Core Series to demonstrate its prowess in various applications, from gaming to content creation. The latest codecs are supported on the CPUs, allowing for better streaming and recording capabilities with tools like OBS and QuickSync. Additionally, the XC Graphics have made their way to the CPUs, taking a long time to arrive but now providing users with access to the latest coding features.

The price of the Intel Core Series is one of the most significant factors to consider when deciding whether or not to adopt it. The top-of-the-line model, the Core 9, is priced at $589, which is a substantial premium over the current generation of CPUs. However, this price point may be out of reach for many consumers who are already invested in their current hardware.

In contrast, the Core Ultra 7 265 K is priced at $379, making it a more accessible option for those looking to upgrade from an older system or make the switch from AMD to Intel. The Core Ultra series offers significant performance improvements over its predecessor, with a power consumption reduction of up to 5W.

For gamers who are already on current-generation hardware, including high-end models like the Intel Core i9-13900K and i9-14900K, the new Core Series may not be worth the investment. However, for those looking to upgrade from older systems or make a switch to Intel, the Core Ultra series offers an exciting opportunity to experience the latest in computing technology.

One of the most significant advantages of the Intel Core Series is its emphasis on overclocking ability. According to Intel, users should aim to overclock their E cores as far as possible to achieve optimal performance. This approach has been successful in previous generations, with users reporting better scores in games like Cinebench and other applications that push the limits of CPU performance.

As we look ahead to the future, it's clear that the Intel Core Series is a significant step forward in computing technology. With its emphasis on power consumption, cooling capabilities, and overclocking ability, this new series promises to deliver unparalleled performance and efficiency for gamers, content creators, and anyone looking to push the limits of what is possible with their hardware.

The release of the Intel Core Series also brings with it a number of questions about pricing and adoption. How many users will take advantage of the latest technology? Will the premium price point be a barrier to adoption, or will the benefits of the new series outweigh the costs?

Only time will tell how the Intel Core Series will perform in real-world applications, but one thing is certain - this is an exciting development that promises to shape the future of computing.

The Release Date of the Intel Core Series

The official release date for the Intel Core Series has been set for October 24th. This date marks a significant milestone in the company's plans to bring its latest and greatest technology to market.

For those who have been eagerly awaiting the launch of the Intel Core Series, this date is sure to be a major point of interest. Will you be among those who take advantage of the new series, or will you opt to wait and see how it performs in real-world applications?

Whatever your decision may be, one thing is certain - the release of the Intel Core Series is going to be an exciting event that promises to shape the future of computing.

The Future of Gaming with X3D

As we look ahead to the future, there's no doubt that the Intel Core Series will play a significant role in shaping the gaming landscape. With its emphasis on power consumption and cooling capabilities, this new series is perfectly positioned to deliver unparalleled performance for gamers.

However, it's also clear that the Intel Core Series is not just about delivering raw power - it's also about efficiency and cost-effectiveness. As the gaming industry continues to evolve, we can expect to see a greater emphasis on environmental sustainability and energy efficiency.

In this context, the release of the Intel Core Series is significant because it promises to deliver a new level of performance that is not only efficient but also sustainable. With its focus on reducing power consumption and minimizing waste, this new series has the potential to shape the future of gaming in ways that were previously unimaginable.

Overall, the Intel Core Series is an exciting development that promises to shape the future of computing. Whether you're a gamer, content creator, or simply someone who wants to stay ahead of the curve, this new series is sure to be worth watching.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enokay so we have all the Dirty Deeds uh not to be confused with acdc's Dirty Deeds Done okay I just age myself whatever we have the new Intel Core Ultra processor 200 stuff to talk about IV power PCS deliver top performance to anyone looking for an allnew system to enhance their gaming experience all II computers are built with quality components featuring the latest CPUs and gpus from the top manufacturers in the market their PCS are also backed by an industry-leading warranty offering 3 years of Labor and 2 years of part for comprehensive post-p purchase support so you can rest assured that your IB power system is always ready to gain when you are to see the latest deals to apply towards the purchase of your new system visit the IB power gaming deals at the link in the description below all right so I'm aware that this is just going to be some slides that we're talking about here cuz we don't have the stuff yet the Embargo for performance doesn't even lift until the 24th uh but anyway we have some of the architecture design stuff that we can talk about here what's different pricing and all of that um I'll try and make this not a long video they in the keynote they not keynote but the Press meeting they spent a lot of time talking about AI now ai I think is AI is the new VR ready SL RGB discussion so many people are sick of hearing about AI it doesn't matter to most people however when it comes to the way that it's intended to be leveraged on these consumer grade processors is to really start to provide npu or neural processing units that are available for game developers to use to allow it to do something alongside the CPU giving an uplift in performance so I just wanted to kind of put that out there before we get to that part because of the fact that I think for most people they're just like whatever man show me theing numbers and move on right and I'm I'm that way too for the most part but as you can imagine just like AMD Intel is leaning heavily on its performance to uh performance per watt gains so they're advertising up to 50% power reduction for the same level of performance plus some so it it sounds very similar right to AMD discussion where AMD launched the 9,000 Series right the 9600 X 9700x and we're like hey it's half the power and it's like single digit more performance and people were like big effing deal I don't care about the efficiency I care about the performance causing AMD to have to basically backtrack and create a 105 power mode for those that are like just give me all the the power at the all the performance at the Power Hit and it only led to like another 10% more performance for like 40% more power so there's an exponential curve obviously that takes place when it comes to power Now intel knows this so the base wattage for the new um like the 285 processor we'll talk about the names the names are so dumb but I think you guys already know this so the new naming schemes if you will for the processors are the ultra 9 285k the ultra 7 265k the ultra 7 265 KF 245k and 245 KF so the 285k the the ultra 9 only has one skew and that that's a full-blown skew that has a igpu npu all that in it you'll notice though that as you go down um the stack and you look at the core counts here hyperthreading is gone that is some that one of the rumors that turned out to be true as we move into this launch that intel was heavily looking at the idea of doing one core per thread and that's exactly what they did here so the I9 excuse me the u9 or Ultra n 24 core 24 thread four GPU cores 13 tops mpu at 5.7 GHz now what I think is kind of cool is as you go down the stack they don't cut down the mpu at all it's 13 tops all the way down the stack which is nice so that additional leverage that game developers can start using for the mpu to handle tasks within their game engine is the same all the way down so there's that benefit to everyone so the 285k is 8p core 16 e cor that's the same as what you're used to seeing with the 139 and 149 it's just there's no hyperthreading and I think that's where they're getting a lot of their efficiency gains from to be honest because if you if you have a an Intel CPU right now that has hyperthreading which is almost all of them if you go right now into say download Hardware info download cin bench let it run and do a Power draw test if you were to then go into your bios disable hyperthreading and run that same test you would see a significant drop in actual power draw now typically you do that you see a big reduction about 30% reduction in your overall performance of your CPU by disabling hyperthreading same for AMD and smt or simultaneous multi-threading which is the same thing however what they're talking about here now is the fact that they have a geomean uplift of like 8% faster for single thread performance versus the the previous gen so that makes sense cuz single thread single core it's just one thread now what happens when you enable all core that's where I would start to say okay are we going to see at 24 threads versus the previous gen 32 threads is this one of those situations where to move forward in the architecture of inel which now is a sort of it's a tile design we're not calling it chiplet cuz AMD technically is chiplets that's what they call them and you have each CCD physically separated from each other and then the iodi physically separated and there's gaps between them they call them tiles where they're all just buted up against each other in a quote unquote 3D format on the exact same substrate so that helps with latency and efficiency in terms of the communication between them but because they've moved on to this more Tile Design now uh what does this mean now for performance are we going to see increase latency are we going to see reduction in overall multi-threaded performance cuz hyperthreading is gone no in multi-threaded performance they're advertising a 15% faster performance geoman which is averaged by the way amongst all their tests by the way you got to understand what geoman means geoman says if you took all the ups and downs plus and minuses and found the average it's on average 15% faster than the previous gen which they were comparing it to 14900 k without hyperthreading so that's that shows us we're seeing some actual fairly big core improvements in terms of the way that the core is handling that workload now they're also advertising 133% faster versus the 950x which is the 32 thread part now that 950x in multi-threaded workloads has been basically hammering the 14900 K uh in in multi-threaded workload so for them to even show an improvement over that shows that we are now getting exactly what we hope for which is leap frogging in competition now when it comes to gaming this is one of those things where whether or not you're going to see an uplift in performance or a decline in performance is going to have everything to do with how well that title and the more tiled design of the CPU interact with the needs of that cpu's latency performance now when it comes to gaming performance on the new core we're they basically showed us the 285k as the uh the real discussion here because that's their top tier part so they've compared it with AMD 950x which I guess in a price comparison makes sense because the CPU is nearly $600 I think a 7800 x3d would probably still beat these CPUs the the ultra 9 CPU and a straight up gaming head-to-head just because of the benefits of the the x3d cache but pricewise it's not a fair comparison so obviously when we do our thirdparty reviews we're going to compare it to a whole gambut of CPU so that you'll be able to see uh or gamut of CP whatever the right word is some games today are very sensitive to latency and cash latency so when it comes to some titles are going to perform slower some titles are going to perform better most titles are not going to perform any different than your current 13 or 14th gen CPU depending on which title it is and and which power profile you're using so we were talking about this a little bit off camera this is this is Intel's Zen this is Intel's first gen Zen if you go back to 16 when AMD made its change to the chiplet design from a standard CPU layout we saw some growing panes we saw some titles although Zen architecture was way faster than anything FX had available at that point compared to Intel we saw many titles not be able to truly leverage the Zen architecture yet because there were too many things that weren't really accounted for and properly designed for and that being the substrate and the chiplet design and the latency that takes place between the ccds when the tasks are handed off to other ccds that's why the 950x and 9900x do core parking today it's designed to just sort of take that latency out entirely so Intel's at least on their charts been forthcoming with hey some are a little faster some are a little slower in terms of overall performance overall it's the same and then they lean heavily on but the power reduction which is a good thing but I think most of us have already expressed with AMD we don't care about power reduction we care about per performance most of us do there's those out there right now that are furiously mashing their keyboard that I am I am disconnected and don't know people's situations and that's true but just read the comments on the efficiency videos and uh you'll see this is not my opinion this is our opinion moving on that's a good discussion but what I was if I digress back to about 3 minutes ago we're going to probably see over the next few Generations that latency between the tiles getting faster now the tiles are basically touching like if you just look at a a at an x-ray of it it looks like one single die but it's not Zen is in its fifth iteration of that this is Intel's first iteration of this it's just ironic if you kind of look at Intel's discussions with Public public facing channels in the past about you glue you glue or we think gamers are going to adopt a wait and see mentality I think they waited and they saw and I think they're doing very well for themselves now AMD anyway moving on we'll talk about power so the base the base power for the CPU is 125 watts so is the current CPUs we know how that went so right now Intel's biggest challenge is truly going to be is this fleshed in a way that two years from now we're not going to find out they're all just jumping off Bridges together cuz that's what it really looks like they're doing Intel has been very adamant that that problem that existed for 13th or 14th gen does not exist an aerrow Lake that's fine we're discussing trust at this point and when trust is broken it is hard to rearn it so we will have to now wait and see Intel how well this works out for you in the future now the power profile the maximum power profile that motherboard manufacturers will be able to create toggles and switches for is 250 Watts on these CPUs it's crazy to me still that there's no hyperthreading but they have a max power wat of 250 that's still a lot I mean let's not forget AMD is at 170 on its 950x so it's still a lot of power so we're just going to have to see uh in real world testing what that means for actual cooler temps I guess one other thing to mention here is XC Graphics have now made their way to the CPUs which has taken a long time now the nice thing about these XC cores existing in the CPUs that have gpus is the fact that uh the latest codecs are supported on the XE so this gives you content or access to like AK streams better codex for your streams when it comes to OBS and such and quicksync a lot of people didn't use because they only it only supported the old older codecs but now you have access to the newest ones separate from your GPU all right let's talk about price cuz that's the last thing that I think is worth mentioning here before we actually get our hands on it and can talk about real world performance core 9 is 589 bucks let me do a quick price search to see on Amazon what the current price of a 14900 K is because that's obviously what it's intended to replace 14900 K are currently 44 $445 on Amazon us 13900 K is 46 16 so you've got about a $144 premium to take on the newest and and that's the thing this is why I say that this is not going to be the best move for people that are already on current generation especially high-end generation if you if you know for a fact that yours is not on its way out um at 589 versus $45 right so we're talking $144 of Premium cost plus whole new platform cuz you're going to need a new motherboard for it as well cuz it's a whole different socket so that is some bleeding edge early adopter price tax price premium for those like me that are idiots and just go I want the latest and greatest at all costs anyway moving on the core Ultra 7 265 K is 3.94 um oh interestingly enough it's only $15 cheaper Oh I thought it were $20 cheaper okay only $15 Cheaper by going with the FSC they used to be 20 bucks so it's 379 for the 265 KF 309 for 245k 394 for the uh 245 KF just get the just get the case CU but anyway um it's not a huge jump barely a jump actually for current Gamers and I'm and I'm talking to Gamers here it's just the newest thing but we can't get anywhere in the future if we don't start somewhere so if we don't start here then we'll never get to there and this only is going to be interesting to people that I think are upgrading from a really old system or even a few Generations old at this point or maybe you're jumping from an older AMD rig to Intel I don't know I don't know why people make the decisions they do to switch platforms uh but the point is if you're on like a 13900 k 13 700k 149 147 whatever this is not this is not interesting to you it's just not the power the power savings is cool and all but I I think we've already learned through amd's 9000 Series launch that Gamers demand performance at that efficiency cost so it'll be interesting to see what the default power profiles are out of the box for the motherboard manufacturers and what kind of additional power we can throw at it if we want to given everything just took place with 13th and 13th and 14th gen ironically though uh Intel is how overclock ability and they're even emphasizing that you should probably overclock the eor to get the best performance actually we saw that with 13th and 14 even 12th gen pushing EES as far as possible usually yielded me better scores on like cinch and stuff like that than pushing PE cores as far as possible I would usually push peores a little bit and then ecores as far as I could till unstable and I saw bigger gains that way and so it seems like that's exactly what they're expecting to happen here okay there you go there's your 700th video that you you probably saw in your inbox today regarding Intel Core Series performance embargo lift October 24th so that's the day that I think you really should care about all right thanks for watching guys sound off down below man I'm really curious how many of you are are going to take a chance on this architecture I think the I think most of you right now if I ask you to say whether or not you're going to adopt or wait I think it's going to be overwhelmingly weight and that's that's okay especially with x3d on the horizon oh yeah that's why yeah the this is when it comes to games 9800 x3d is what we're all waiting forokay so we have all the Dirty Deeds uh not to be confused with acdc's Dirty Deeds Done okay I just age myself whatever we have the new Intel Core Ultra processor 200 stuff to talk about IV power PCS deliver top performance to anyone looking for an allnew system to enhance their gaming experience all II computers are built with quality components featuring the latest CPUs and gpus from the top manufacturers in the market their PCS are also backed by an industry-leading warranty offering 3 years of Labor and 2 years of part for comprehensive post-p purchase support so you can rest assured that your IB power system is always ready to gain when you are to see the latest deals to apply towards the purchase of your new system visit the IB power gaming deals at the link in the description below all right so I'm aware that this is just going to be some slides that we're talking about here cuz we don't have the stuff yet the Embargo for performance doesn't even lift until the 24th uh but anyway we have some of the architecture design stuff that we can talk about here what's different pricing and all of that um I'll try and make this not a long video they in the keynote they not keynote but the Press meeting they spent a lot of time talking about AI now ai I think is AI is the new VR ready SL RGB discussion so many people are sick of hearing about AI it doesn't matter to most people however when it comes to the way that it's intended to be leveraged on these consumer grade processors is to really start to provide npu or neural processing units that are available for game developers to use to allow it to do something alongside the CPU giving an uplift in performance so I just wanted to kind of put that out there before we get to that part because of the fact that I think for most people they're just like whatever man show me theing numbers and move on right and I'm I'm that way too for the most part but as you can imagine just like AMD Intel is leaning heavily on its performance to uh performance per watt gains so they're advertising up to 50% power reduction for the same level of performance plus some so it it sounds very similar right to AMD discussion where AMD launched the 9,000 Series right the 9600 X 9700x and we're like hey it's half the power and it's like single digit more performance and people were like big effing deal I don't care about the efficiency I care about the performance causing AMD to have to basically backtrack and create a 105 power mode for those that are like just give me all the the power at the all the performance at the Power Hit and it only led to like another 10% more performance for like 40% more power so there's an exponential curve obviously that takes place when it comes to power Now intel knows this so the base wattage for the new um like the 285 processor we'll talk about the names the names are so dumb but I think you guys already know this so the new naming schemes if you will for the processors are the ultra 9 285k the ultra 7 265k the ultra 7 265 KF 245k and 245 KF so the 285k the the ultra 9 only has one skew and that that's a full-blown skew that has a igpu npu all that in it you'll notice though that as you go down um the stack and you look at the core counts here hyperthreading is gone that is some that one of the rumors that turned out to be true as we move into this launch that intel was heavily looking at the idea of doing one core per thread and that's exactly what they did here so the I9 excuse me the u9 or Ultra n 24 core 24 thread four GPU cores 13 tops mpu at 5.7 GHz now what I think is kind of cool is as you go down the stack they don't cut down the mpu at all it's 13 tops all the way down the stack which is nice so that additional leverage that game developers can start using for the mpu to handle tasks within their game engine is the same all the way down so there's that benefit to everyone so the 285k is 8p core 16 e cor that's the same as what you're used to seeing with the 139 and 149 it's just there's no hyperthreading and I think that's where they're getting a lot of their efficiency gains from to be honest because if you if you have a an Intel CPU right now that has hyperthreading which is almost all of them if you go right now into say download Hardware info download cin bench let it run and do a Power draw test if you were to then go into your bios disable hyperthreading and run that same test you would see a significant drop in actual power draw now typically you do that you see a big reduction about 30% reduction in your overall performance of your CPU by disabling hyperthreading same for AMD and smt or simultaneous multi-threading which is the same thing however what they're talking about here now is the fact that they have a geomean uplift of like 8% faster for single thread performance versus the the previous gen so that makes sense cuz single thread single core it's just one thread now what happens when you enable all core that's where I would start to say okay are we going to see at 24 threads versus the previous gen 32 threads is this one of those situations where to move forward in the architecture of inel which now is a sort of it's a tile design we're not calling it chiplet cuz AMD technically is chiplets that's what they call them and you have each CCD physically separated from each other and then the iodi physically separated and there's gaps between them they call them tiles where they're all just buted up against each other in a quote unquote 3D format on the exact same substrate so that helps with latency and efficiency in terms of the communication between them but because they've moved on to this more Tile Design now uh what does this mean now for performance are we going to see increase latency are we going to see reduction in overall multi-threaded performance cuz hyperthreading is gone no in multi-threaded performance they're advertising a 15% faster performance geoman which is averaged by the way amongst all their tests by the way you got to understand what geoman means geoman says if you took all the ups and downs plus and minuses and found the average it's on average 15% faster than the previous gen which they were comparing it to 14900 k without hyperthreading so that's that shows us we're seeing some actual fairly big core improvements in terms of the way that the core is handling that workload now they're also advertising 133% faster versus the 950x which is the 32 thread part now that 950x in multi-threaded workloads has been basically hammering the 14900 K uh in in multi-threaded workload so for them to even show an improvement over that shows that we are now getting exactly what we hope for which is leap frogging in competition now when it comes to gaming this is one of those things where whether or not you're going to see an uplift in performance or a decline in performance is going to have everything to do with how well that title and the more tiled design of the CPU interact with the needs of that cpu's latency performance now when it comes to gaming performance on the new core we're they basically showed us the 285k as the uh the real discussion here because that's their top tier part so they've compared it with AMD 950x which I guess in a price comparison makes sense because the CPU is nearly $600 I think a 7800 x3d would probably still beat these CPUs the the ultra 9 CPU and a straight up gaming head-to-head just because of the benefits of the the x3d cache but pricewise it's not a fair comparison so obviously when we do our thirdparty reviews we're going to compare it to a whole gambut of CPU so that you'll be able to see uh or gamut of CP whatever the right word is some games today are very sensitive to latency and cash latency so when it comes to some titles are going to perform slower some titles are going to perform better most titles are not going to perform any different than your current 13 or 14th gen CPU depending on which title it is and and which power profile you're using so we were talking about this a little bit off camera this is this is Intel's Zen this is Intel's first gen Zen if you go back to 16 when AMD made its change to the chiplet design from a standard CPU layout we saw some growing panes we saw some titles although Zen architecture was way faster than anything FX had available at that point compared to Intel we saw many titles not be able to truly leverage the Zen architecture yet because there were too many things that weren't really accounted for and properly designed for and that being the substrate and the chiplet design and the latency that takes place between the ccds when the tasks are handed off to other ccds that's why the 950x and 9900x do core parking today it's designed to just sort of take that latency out entirely so Intel's at least on their charts been forthcoming with hey some are a little faster some are a little slower in terms of overall performance overall it's the same and then they lean heavily on but the power reduction which is a good thing but I think most of us have already expressed with AMD we don't care about power reduction we care about per performance most of us do there's those out there right now that are furiously mashing their keyboard that I am I am disconnected and don't know people's situations and that's true but just read the comments on the efficiency videos and uh you'll see this is not my opinion this is our opinion moving on that's a good discussion but what I was if I digress back to about 3 minutes ago we're going to probably see over the next few Generations that latency between the tiles getting faster now the tiles are basically touching like if you just look at a a at an x-ray of it it looks like one single die but it's not Zen is in its fifth iteration of that this is Intel's first iteration of this it's just ironic if you kind of look at Intel's discussions with Public public facing channels in the past about you glue you glue or we think gamers are going to adopt a wait and see mentality I think they waited and they saw and I think they're doing very well for themselves now AMD anyway moving on we'll talk about power so the base the base power for the CPU is 125 watts so is the current CPUs we know how that went so right now Intel's biggest challenge is truly going to be is this fleshed in a way that two years from now we're not going to find out they're all just jumping off Bridges together cuz that's what it really looks like they're doing Intel has been very adamant that that problem that existed for 13th or 14th gen does not exist an aerrow Lake that's fine we're discussing trust at this point and when trust is broken it is hard to rearn it so we will have to now wait and see Intel how well this works out for you in the future now the power profile the maximum power profile that motherboard manufacturers will be able to create toggles and switches for is 250 Watts on these CPUs it's crazy to me still that there's no hyperthreading but they have a max power wat of 250 that's still a lot I mean let's not forget AMD is at 170 on its 950x so it's still a lot of power so we're just going to have to see uh in real world testing what that means for actual cooler temps I guess one other thing to mention here is XC Graphics have now made their way to the CPUs which has taken a long time now the nice thing about these XC cores existing in the CPUs that have gpus is the fact that uh the latest codecs are supported on the XE so this gives you content or access to like AK streams better codex for your streams when it comes to OBS and such and quicksync a lot of people didn't use because they only it only supported the old older codecs but now you have access to the newest ones separate from your GPU all right let's talk about price cuz that's the last thing that I think is worth mentioning here before we actually get our hands on it and can talk about real world performance core 9 is 589 bucks let me do a quick price search to see on Amazon what the current price of a 14900 K is because that's obviously what it's intended to replace 14900 K are currently 44 $445 on Amazon us 13900 K is 46 16 so you've got about a $144 premium to take on the newest and and that's the thing this is why I say that this is not going to be the best move for people that are already on current generation especially high-end generation if you if you know for a fact that yours is not on its way out um at 589 versus $45 right so we're talking $144 of Premium cost plus whole new platform cuz you're going to need a new motherboard for it as well cuz it's a whole different socket so that is some bleeding edge early adopter price tax price premium for those like me that are idiots and just go I want the latest and greatest at all costs anyway moving on the core Ultra 7 265 K is 3.94 um oh interestingly enough it's only $15 cheaper Oh I thought it were $20 cheaper okay only $15 Cheaper by going with the FSC they used to be 20 bucks so it's 379 for the 265 KF 309 for 245k 394 for the uh 245 KF just get the just get the case CU but anyway um it's not a huge jump barely a jump actually for current Gamers and I'm and I'm talking to Gamers here it's just the newest thing but we can't get anywhere in the future if we don't start somewhere so if we don't start here then we'll never get to there and this only is going to be interesting to people that I think are upgrading from a really old system or even a few Generations old at this point or maybe you're jumping from an older AMD rig to Intel I don't know I don't know why people make the decisions they do to switch platforms uh but the point is if you're on like a 13900 k 13 700k 149 147 whatever this is not this is not interesting to you it's just not the power the power savings is cool and all but I I think we've already learned through amd's 9000 Series launch that Gamers demand performance at that efficiency cost so it'll be interesting to see what the default power profiles are out of the box for the motherboard manufacturers and what kind of additional power we can throw at it if we want to given everything just took place with 13th and 13th and 14th gen ironically though uh Intel is how overclock ability and they're even emphasizing that you should probably overclock the eor to get the best performance actually we saw that with 13th and 14 even 12th gen pushing EES as far as possible usually yielded me better scores on like cinch and stuff like that than pushing PE cores as far as possible I would usually push peores a little bit and then ecores as far as I could till unstable and I saw bigger gains that way and so it seems like that's exactly what they're expecting to happen here okay there you go there's your 700th video that you you probably saw in your inbox today regarding Intel Core Series performance embargo lift October 24th so that's the day that I think you really should care about all right thanks for watching guys sound off down below man I'm really curious how many of you are are going to take a chance on this architecture I think the I think most of you right now if I ask you to say whether or not you're going to adopt or wait I think it's going to be overwhelmingly weight and that's that's okay especially with x3d on the horizon oh yeah that's why yeah the this is when it comes to games 9800 x3d is what we're all waiting for\n"