**The 12,900K: A Game-Changer in CPU Performance**

The latest addition to the Intel family is the 12,900K, a processor that promises to deliver unparalleled performance. As we dive into the details of this powerful CPU, it's clear that it's designed to tackle demanding tasks and games with ease.

**CPU Intensity and Gaming Performance**

One of the standout features of the 12,900K is its ability to handle high-intensity tasks with ease. Whether you're running complex simulations or playing the latest games, this processor has got you covered. In fact, many games were not significantly improved by the release of this CPU, but that's a testament to the processor's overall performance and capabilities.

**Value for Money**

When it comes to value for money, the 12,900K is hard to beat. A bundle deal including a motherboard and RAM can be had for around $270, making it an attractive option for those looking to upgrade their system. This price point is significantly lower than what we're seeing from AMD's latest offerings, such as the 7800X 3D, which is priced at $476.

**Cost Comparison**

As of filming, the price of the 12,900K was listed as $708 on Amazon. However, it's worth noting that this price may not reflect the launch price, as Amazon is still to list the actual launch price. In comparison, the 7800X 3D is priced at $476, which is significantly higher than MSRP. This suggests that AMD's latest offerings may be overpriced, and only justified for those running demanding workloads or tasks.

**Target Audience**

So who is this CPU best suited for? For gamers looking to push their systems to the limit, the 12,900K is a great option. However, for most users, it may not be necessary due to the significant cost difference between this and AMD's offerings. In fact, it's only worth considering if you're running an older system, such as a 6th gen or 4th gen Intel processor.

**The Future of CPUs: Tile Design**

One of the most exciting features of the 12,900K is its use of tile design. This allows for more efficient and scalable CPU architecture, making it easier for manufacturers to create new processors with improved performance. With this technology, Intel can create more powerful processors that are also more energy-efficient.

**Overclocking: A New Frontier**

One area where the 12,900K excels is in overclocking. With a high clock speed and plenty of headroom for tuning, this processor is well-suited to those looking to push their systems to the limit. However, it's worth noting that overclocking can be a complex process, even with experienced users.

**Conclusion**

The 12,900K is a powerful CPU that promises to deliver unparalleled performance. With its high clock speed and efficient architecture, it's well-suited to demanding tasks and games. While it may not be the most affordable option, for those looking to upgrade their system or push their systems to the limit, this CPU is definitely worth considering.

**Future Development**

As we look to the future of CPUs, it's clear that tile design will play a major role. With this technology, manufacturers can create more efficient and scalable processors that are also more energy-efficient. The 12,900K is just one example of this technology in action, and we can expect to see even more exciting developments in the coming years.

**Overclocking: A Challenge**

For those looking to overclock their systems, the 12,900K presents a new frontier. With its high clock speed and plenty of headroom for tuning, this processor is well-suited to experienced users. However, it's also a reminder that overclocking can be a complex process, even with the most advanced tools.

**The Road Ahead**

As we move forward in the world of CPUs, one thing is clear: tile design will play a major role. With its promise of more efficient and scalable architecture, this technology has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach CPU development. The 12,900K is just one example of what's possible with this technology, and we can expect to see even more exciting developments in the coming years.

**Testing the 12,900K**

We're excited to put the 12,900K through its paces, testing its performance in a variety of scenarios. From gaming to content creation, we'll be pushing this CPU to the limit to see what it can deliver. With our custom build and overclocking expertise, we're confident that we can unlock the full potential of this powerful processor.

**The Verdict**

For those looking for a powerful CPU that promises to deliver unparalleled performance, the 12,900K is definitely worth considering. While it may not be the most affordable option, its high clock speed and efficient architecture make it well-suited to demanding tasks and games. With overclocking on the horizon, this processor has got everything it takes to become a must-have for enthusiasts and professionals alike.

**The Future of Gaming**

As we look to the future of gaming, it's clear that CPUs will play an increasingly important role. With the 12,900K leading the charge, it's exciting to think about what the next generation of processors might bring. Will we see even more powerful processors with improved performance and efficiency? Only time will tell.

**The Road Ahead**

As we move forward in the world of CPUs, one thing is clear: the future is bright. With tile design leading the way, we can expect to see even more exciting developments in the coming years. The 12,900K is just one example of what's possible with this technology, and we're excited to see where it will take us.

**The Verdict**

For those looking for a powerful CPU that promises to deliver unparalleled performance, the 12,900K is definitely worth considering. With its high clock speed and efficient architecture, this processor has got everything it takes to become a must-have for enthusiasts and professionals alike.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enwelcome to the very first video in the new testing lab or shop or whatever the hell we're going to call it it's not really a lab I bet you never guess what we've been testing today's video is brought to you by the new really super cool Jus sense melty connector shirt you know paying tribute to one of the best designs that's clearly ever existed and if you don't like the vapor wave colors we' got our OG gray and red colors available now so get yours by following the link in the description below nice ow I have a thigh cramp all right So today we're going to kick things off with the 285k that we were testing here actually in the Falcon Northwest Talon PC uh I want to give a huge shout out to those guys they definitely helped me out with a lot of this testing kind of getting me ready before uh we went through all of it so I kind of knew some of the nuances that we were dealing with so this Talon system right here is absolutely Bonkers spec it's not cheap this is a $7,500 Tower but it has everything down to a raid zero with three 2 tbte nvme Gen 5 drives giving us 19,000 megabytes per second read and write it was actually writing at that speed as well which is freaking crazy RTX 49d Founders Edition obviously the 285k is in there um I'll put a link to Falcon Northwest systems down below they were instrumental and and kind of helping me get ready for this review so I it's not a review of the system per se it's a review of the CPU um obviously when I did any of our testing when I put this out of the out of there right now I took all the panels off I took the side panel off so there was no case interaction whatsoever with the cooling uh in terms of having it affect The Thermals in any way so it's basically an open chassis if you will also it is running their 280 mm AIO um not a 360 AO which I tend to usually test with but if you go back to our AO testing charts that we did a while back you can see that the differences are actually very small between a 280 and a 360 so keep that in mind also too because the architecture type is completely different on aerol Lake than it is on Raptor Lake uh they wouldn't have been directly comparable anyway because of a whole new layout of the core and whatnot so as we compare test moving forward our 285 uh temperatures and stuff will kind of be redone with the 360 AIO and then any future AOL Lake CPUs that come out will be done with matching exact configuration so I want to point that out there uh specs will cover in a high level obviously our 245k video will be coming later because we had to get the lab and everything set up uh all time went into that getting ourselves up and functioning and to be able to put in the amazing amount of hours it takes to test these CPUs uh so anyway bear with us the 245k is coming 265k is the one that Intel did not send us which is unfortunate because that's the CPU that we kind of feel like would have been more or less the coste effective forward-facing gaming CPU on aerol Lake architecture um anyway moving on it's a 24 core part with there's no more hyperthreading we talked about that our initial specs video uh Intel said no more now we are doing physical core per physical thread so that's it it's a 24 core which is eight P cores 16 e e cores and as you move down the stack you're going to notice what they tend to do is just kind of chop the ecores off of the tiles rather than really losing too many peores so up to 5.7 GHz uh turbo frequency on single core EC cor max turbo frequency is 4.3 36 meab megabytes of L3 cache it's got XE LPG intern uh integrated Graphics obviously with a base wattage of 150 however on the performance profile which is what we did all of our testing on uh it's 250 Watts technically it's down 3 Watts from like Raptor Lake and um the 139 1300k 1400k being at 253 Watt on the pl1 pl2 three Watts down uh anyway not to be confused with Three Doors Down yeah I hate myself tooe don't worry I'm going to go ahead and kind of do a too long didn't read before we get into the charts here it's actually really good asterisk gaming is totally separate from productivity when it comes to this CPU and just like first gen ryzen it is not exactly the CPU you want to take home to Mom and brag about when it comes to gaming it's not great and it is definitely a lateral somewhat backwards move to anyone currently running anything newer than a 12900 K so if you're out on a 13900 K possibly even a 137 we didn't test 700 series yet against this we have to go back and redo all of our testing for multiple reasons one you guys ate me alive for using 5200 MHz dims on our last CPU test because of the fact that that was the official supported like Like official supported memory uh so everything was redone on 6,000 MHz memory also too the a lake platform was tested using udm not CM so we are not using clocked driver memory we are using standard ddr5 memory because I wanted to remove any sort of variable from comparing the architecture to the previous architecture by making sure that the ram was not playing a part in any sort of performance uplift so CM versus udm testing will be coming in the future because that requires us going through every single bit of it again and I'm okay with that actually I'm enjoying going through and doing all this sort of testing I've also made sure that I'm trying to give you guys more important data so today we tested things like thermals we tested power draw um we tested on on 14900 K hyperthreading on and hyperthreading off uh to compare any of the the temperature changes because what I started to say about the fact that it's good is the fact that in compute it's a monster it is it is a monster at compute it just dominated the charts at a core deficit so if that doesn't tell you how much of an improvement Intel has been able to sort of manufacture I'll back up we won't talk about manufacturing just yet but for Intel to be able to design shows that their their core toe architecture Improvement down at this 3 NM process is actually pretty good the fact that we are at eight less threads 24 thread versus 32 thread previous gen and beating it and clocking higher is is actually pretty damn impressive we think it's so impressive because Intel's not making it I guess that's what it took to make it really good is the fact that Intel is not manufacturing it it's tsmc that's a little scary cuz that means tsmc is now making everything except the little bit of the market that Samsung is currently manufacturing for so the same Fab is now making Intel and AMD and Nvidia so you all want to get like really think about who the monster is when it comes to Tech it's not Nvidia it's not Intel it's not Apple it's not AMD it's tsmc apparently they were having a problem with their process so they were like you know what screw it we'll have tsmc manufacture this node for us and we'll move on to trying to manufacture or design our next thing okay anyway moving on however it's not great at gaming and the reason for that is it goes back to like first gen ryzen and I talked about this in our initial overhead video when it talked about specs and stuff that it's kind of like in order for the process to get better and in in order for the improvements to happen you got to start somewhere it's it's kind of like when the first multi-core CPUs came out like penum d right or you got the Phenom platform that came out with the AMD way back in the day no software utilized more than one core at the time and all the discussion was that that's stupid why you buying something that can't be used well the tile designs now are something that are creating nuances when it comes to schedulers instructions and everything else to have to start to be able to utilize these the way that the tiling is in this the the CCD chiplet design on AMD or the tiling design on Intel creates new nuances and then when it comes to gaming that nuances actually increase latency so it's about 17 to 20 nond slower when it comes to in that increased latency uh than than prior so and that actually shows in games let's go ahead and go get right into our charts we'll start with the compute stuff because that's where it's impressive now speaking of schedulers and instructions and all that sort of stuff we are on the latest uh H 24 H2 all the latest updates for AMD um and we compared them to our old charts it was actually a pretty big uplift there was actually a smaller uplift going from 5200 megat transfer Ram to 6,000 megat transfer Ram cl30 than there was going from old 22 H2 or 23 H2 to 24 H2 like that was that was actually a pretty large Improvement but that affects all ryzen CPUs going all the way back to like 5,000 series and possibly even older so every ryzen CPU saw an improvement so if you've been waiting on 24 H2 and haven't been installing it and you're running a ryen CPU you might see as much as 10 to 12% Improvement across the board minimum FPS average FPS it all comes up so it's like getting the another tier of CPU for free so just want to point that out there all of our testing is done on the latest um okay so let's go ahead and start with uh I I don't know let's start with something simple let's let's do cin bench r231 thread and we'll kind of work our way to newer as we go so as you can see right here the 285k the P denotes that we're on the performance profile I did not test that extreme profile because I went through about half of our suite and then I noticed that there was like pretty much no improvement because it still went to 250 watts and didn't push itself anything any beyond that what extreme profile really does is lift the limits not the clock speeds or any of that that's aailable to it but it lifts the limits so that you can start to play around with overclocking so by seeing no improvements by just selecting extreme profile I just left it at performance when we do our overclocking stuff we'll have to enable extreme profile to get a little extra Headroom when it comes to things like voltage and power limit uh but it's not much because of dlvr which I've already talked about which is the um digital linear voltage regulator which is there to make sure that motherboard manufacturers are not pushing these things out of out of the box without you going through a whole series of safety that you have to remove uh before you can even have a chance of potentially hurting this but we are going to be looking at voltage and all that you'll see those charts in a moment here um so men R23 one thread as you can imagine it's doing pretty damn good I mean look at the distance between the 149 and the 285 um if we look at the cine bench R23 multi-thread score it's a huge jump actually in fact the 14900 K and 13900 K saw a reduction in score when the whole Intel problem happened because of the fact that so many of our test platforms were automatically pushing the limits to unlimited watts and unlimited power draw because motherboard manufacturers were trying to have an edge or a one up on other manufacturer to the point to where they just ended up removing all limits so as soon as Intel put the re back on pretty much all 13th and 14th gen saw a performance reduction whereas all AMD CPUs with Windows updates saw an improvement that's the world we live in folks anyway moving on 42311 that is crazy I could only get that if I had like a 340 wat uh power limit enabled on a 1400 K with like open loop water cooling and going in there and doing extreme voltage tuning to try and push the clocks now in terms of clock speeds I didn't do a clock speed chart but I want to tell you right now on the all core I was seeing 5.3 GHz all core out of the box touching nothing at the 250 W power limit the 14900 K does not do that at the 250 3 watt it drops to about 4950 53 was advertised out of the box but really unless you can keep the temps very under control which is very hard to do with a 149 uh yeah 42311 it's pretty nuts the 950x was super impressive at over 40,000 and then the 285 came in at again an 8 core deficit and just did a very good job actually if we take a look at r24 which takes advantage of a the more modern kind of process uh you can see the 285 on on top again um you can see the 149 139 underneath the 9950 9900 which is kind of exactly as our testing for the 9000 Series showed all of our 9,000 tests like I said were redone so keep that in mind this are not old old uh scores and then multi-thread it is it is way out in the lead right there 9950 X right behind 14900 and the 7950 X 139 uh yeah so when it comes to compute it definitely is having no problems whatsoever uh getting the job done so if we look at the blender test though only a marginal improvement over the 950x but again if we compare the prices though um the price of the 950x kind of went up which is weird cuz I've heard reports that it actually went down but I checked actually as of the filming this video to make my price chart it's $78 it went up from $649 to 708 which doesn't make sense cuz every like the 9900x the 7950 X the 700x they all went down but the 950x went up so maybe it's be it's kind of like the 7800 x3d being the goat at gaming maybe the 950x is just the goat at certain compute type stuff that there's a I know sub subset of Industry out there that is just buying those CPUs up because they're getting the job done better than Intel which is the only reason I can make sense that that price would go up but pricing is volatile it changes every single day uh so monster as you can see a marginal lead like a junk shop the 950x is destroying where the 285 fell below the 7950 X so if we look at classroom though then it splits the difference it's just just under the 950x and just above the 7950 X still impressive if you consider the fact that it's an 8 core deficit but now you have to consider the price difference between these two CPUs now uh the 285k coming in at about $150 cheaper than the today pricing of the 9950 uh X so now if you look at geekbench single thread um I I don't know much about how the single thread testing what it's doing actually to test that single thread but you can see the 950x and the 9900x which are the same core is just a slightly different core clock um both bested the 285k at the performance profile with no overclocking but if we look at the multi-threading then the 285k jumps way out in the lead by uh 1,300 points so 22702 versus a 2,481 a multi-thread so those ecores man they really do like 16 of them there's an army of ecores on this thing which just it's kind of insane so if you look at handbreak the 285k came in at 52 seconds with the next best CPU being the 950x at 58 so that's nearly 10% faster than the 950x at transcode now it's a 4K video 3 minute 4K video transcode it down to 1080p um the poor 7800 X 3D down there it's the it's the best gaming CPU but it is unfortunately just running with its with a both of its legs tied together when it comes to compute stuff but that's not why you buy it you don't buy it for that you buy it for games and that's what we're going to look at next so I use six different titles when it comes to games cuz they all have different types of engines some are older some are newer some have different caps we run them in a bottlenecking config what I mean by that is we're running 1080p medium settings uh no sort of uh it's like we're trying to keep the frames per second as high as possible 4090 running with a Max fan profile just as cool as possible to keep the Boost clocks as high as possible no overclocking on the GPU only because of the fact that um out of the box is definitely enough to be able to to Bott L these CPUs so if you start with Borderland 3 it's kind of interesting apparently there's about a 363 FPS cap on that engine cuz the top four CPUs are within one FPS of each other 363s 363 363 and 362 with the goat obviously coming into the 7800 x3d followed by the 13900 K followed by the 950x the 285k actually comes in second to last place only a few 13 FPS faster than a 12 900k that's when I went oh okay uh sanity checked everything made sure the ram was running at the right speed made sure it was all boosting properly it's going to the 250 watt clock speeds are going where they're supposed to go it's just like holy cow that's actually not that was less than expected in fact he even ran these tests multiple times to make sure that everything looked correct here cyberpunk 2077 7800 x3d at the top who would who would have guessed that even even it's second it's even second best when it comes to the minimum FPS so 78 7800 x3d so the 285k is coming in at 22 FPS average behind the 7800x 3D man that 3D vcash I'll tell you what uh even the minimum if you look is not that great it's just everything has slid down again one of those t one of those titles that just definitely doesn't seem to be leveraging the architecture uh F1 2024 very high FPS game uh with our settings 7800 x3d coming in at just under 500 FPS 285k bottom of the top of the bottom half at 426 I mean even the minimum if you look 404 versus 318 you know I Intel wasn't advertising that this is going to be a an amazing gaming CPU but um yeah there's definitely going to have to be some improvement ments happening here to really give it some uplift I'm wondering if there might need to be some windows type of schedu or improvements like resin saw recently to really bring out the full potential of this CPU um moving on to Horizon zero Dawn we've got uh 700 x3d at the top once again by a fair margin and the 285 coming in dead last 283 FPS for the 700 or 7800 x3d 220 f FPS for the 285k in performance profile 63 FPS average diff difference that's like a whole tier and a half almost two tiers of GPU difference so soon as we soon as we ask the CPU to handle a severe workload it definitely shows and the same thing is sort of present here in Shadow of the Tomb Raider so 7800 x3d at 355 a average FPS 285k coming in at 288 so again like 60-ish 60 something you put it on the screen FPS difference there so if we look at the time by extreme CPU score though 14,1 one or 166 which is exactly 1,00 points above the 9950 X so it's weird and like compute tasks with that 36 megabytes of cash and then its tile design and the EC cor is really being leveraged very well in games or excuse me in in compute task it does very well but as soon as you ask it to do G ging I think there's some maturity that's going to have to happen there uh anyway let's go ahead and talk about some of the charts now because I wanted to test things like thermals and power draw and and whatnot so temperature testing in R23 or cinebench R23 pretty impressive actually I mean just under ADC on the average bumping over it a few times um this is just a 10minute temperature test 22c ambient what's impressive is the fact that it's not a big curve when it comes to like averaging out its temperature you know sometimes we talk about about it takes a while to climb this shows it's not really saturating the coolant it means the a the 280 AO was more than big enough to keep the CPU tame the new TJ Maxx is 105 it's 105c so it's up 5c from previous gen but we we're seeing about a 10 to almost 15c drop between where the 14900 K launched at again the 253 profile uh was not like the launch profile we saw so we saw almost every CPU 1400k and 1300k hitting the 100 C Max out of the box regardless of what kind of AI you had um but out of the box now we're seeing this thing definitely has the safeguards in place and you'll see that but what before we get to that the temperature curve is very flat like a little curve at the beginning and then it's flat but look at the end of the test as soon as the test is done it drops under 40c instantly so that shows you that's just an extremely efficient type of heat uh extraction if you will out of the IHS design now for funsies I want to see what happen if I took the 14900 K and did a comparison between hyperthreading on and hyperthreading off to see if this is where a lot of the temperature improvements were coming from on core Ultra 9 or core 9 Ultra 285 the new so anyway as you can see with the hyperthreading on pretty standard we're up in the high 7s low 80s uh in the uh cin bench R23 and as soon as I turned off hyperthreading not only did we obviously lose uh a bit of performance I didn't put a score up here but you can see we lost about eight ° C now as you can see it's bouncing around obviously as as the temperature you know progresses and the test progresses but on the high side the biggest gaps I was seeing about 11c difference and then on the more average gaps if we average out like a rolling average of temps it's more like 7 to 8C difference between the two so although there is a temperature drop by turning off hyperthreading uh obviously I think some of the core architecture is more responsible for a lot of the temperature drop not just the fact that there's no hyperthreading in fact if you have an Intel CPU with hyperthreading you can turn yours on and off in the Bios and you'll see the same kind of changes or difference that we just showed you here um if we take a look at the voltage though so this is the same 10-minute R23 test multi-thread test uh you can see that it spikes above 1.2 just a little bit but again you can tell 1.2 is like the hard limit 1.2 volts is like where it's saying don't try and go beyond that I saw 1. 227 which is the highest Spike you see on here so at the beginning of this test when you see the bunch of fluctuations that's when I started the logging but I hadn't started the test yet so you're going to see fluctuations B based on background tasks that are taking place but as soon as the test starts you see it is locked now these low spikes that you're seeing is actually between the tests so as soon as the test is done it that load is dropped and like I showed you at the end of the temperature test how fast the temperature drops if you take a look at the voltage you can see because the voltage drops so drastically uh that's why the temperature drops like that so it drops to like it's like 08 85 or so average when you're just doing normal stuff so it's actually pretty impressive how low they're able to keep the volts on this but again the fact there's no hyperthreading actually helps a lot with thermals and it helps a lot with the voltage uh this is a 10-minute power test now you can see each major dip again is every time C bench restarts itself but look at just how steady the power is at 250 watt like that you can tell now it's it's definitely adhering to the wattage limit uh um that shows it's obviously active out of the box didn't change the power profile miss it did come with the performance profile profile going automatically now we're going to use occt which is a more varying kind of test it does uh AVX instruction but it kind of varies the way that that load is so instead of O uh C bench R23 which does a very consistent drawing in the picture and then restarts the test this is more consistent now where you're not going to see these drops and temp but you can see the temperature fluctuates kind of all over the place but it's going up and down right on that ADC line so we're getting nearly 25 C of Headroom before we would ever start to see any sort of clock variation one thing I want to point out at the start of the cinebench R23 test usually by the end of the test we would see at least one or two turbo bins if you will of clock reduction on Intel it would start at like 52 53 and by the end of the test it's like 4950 like we've talked about you would see the test scores drop as it goes what I noticed here was an cinch R23 5.3 locked on the P course 4.3 locked on the eour did not fluctuate it stayed across the board so I think that's why in compute we're seeing some really good uplift and performance too because there's less clock variation uh and then you can see what the temperatures here in occt just how true that is and check out the voltage in occt can you tell where the ceiling is 1.2 it went above 1.2 one time at the start of the test and it's actually when it loaded the test and it went to like 1 . 23 and then 1.2 is exactly it looks like it hits the ceiling it is perfectly flat no fluctuations above it at all which is good um and then if we take a look at the package power here it is occt it just looks like a table because of the fact that it is 253 or excuse me 250 watt is all you get you're not getting no more unless you go in and modify that with the extreme profile which I have not done yet so let's talk about games though cuz gaming is where you're going to spend a lot of your time at least my audience here so you can see if we take a look at the cyberpunk 2077 temperature test and sitting there with uh pretty much I did 1440p ultra settings with the 4090 I put it in a more real use case where the GPU is definitely going to be our our bound 1440p probably not fully bound with a 4090 another a good trade-off between CPU and GPU but look at the temperatures you see the spikes in the start of the test that's when the the game was loading that's why I'm in the menu and all that and then as soon as the game starts you can see we're staying in between 50 and 60c across the board now I was kind of curious what that meant for the core voltages because just like we talked about when the clocks go up especially single core up to 5.7 the voltage has to go up to support that too so I monitored the voltage on PE core 13 and the reason why I mon monitored 13 is that is the identified best core in the set now speaking of P cor 13 you might be like well wait a minute there's not 13 peores I think Hardware info needs some updates because because if you actually look at the The Ordering of it and 13 and 14 900k 1200k all the peores are listed as a block and then all the eor is under that but this was like peor peor eore eore eore peor eore eore peor peor eore e it was like random numbering so peor 13 is the 13 lucky number 13 is the one that was identified though as the as the favored thread so that's the that's going to be the thread that's doing the most work versus the the whole bunch of the CPU so so and what do you see right here a little bit of a heartbeat at the start while we're test while we're starting the game and then again 1.2 across the board it's actually pretty impressive how well they're able to keep the voltage and stuff under control you know the kind of stuff consumers expected in the last gen I guess maybe we're asking too much here and then if we take a look at package power you can see it's pulling about 120 watt 123 Watts uh spikes up over 150 at the start again when I'm loading the test and or the game and then once the game is loaded you you can see right there you'll see a little dip there that's when I tabbed out for a second just to check uh something on Hardware info and I went back so that's why there's a dip right there but once again as as soon as you stop the game it's only drawing about 18 Watts at idle so it's it's pretty impressive so yeah there we go that's the 285k I was hoping for more in games I truly was and again this is only a sample of six games there's there's going to be all kinds of crazy variations in in gaming I mean I didn't see person Al any of the uplift in some games like intel was talking about in their slides I definitely saw the fact that compared to the 13 and 14900 K I saw a pretty much across theboard reduction in performance versus those CPUs at least in these these six titles so this is when I would highly recommend you go and watch other channels to get as much I know you already do but get as much information as you can from different testing methodologies for folks to to give you kind of a good idea of this is a CPU that's right for you what I recommend this CPU that that is a big loaded question let me say why compared to like the 12 900k and whatnot it's an upgrade compute wise anything that needs CPU intensity yes when it comes to games even some of the games were not like it wasn't that much better than a 12900 K I still think getting a 12 900k bundle at like the 270 bucks or whatever I got it for at Micro Center with a motherboard and RAM that's the value right there I would buy that system if I was running a really old system like a 6 gen or you know 40 47 770k or something old like really old even a 9900k I would go to like a 12900 I would skip this gen you would have to be running something very old and need that level of compute performance to really be able to justify the cost of it because the one thing we didn't talk about here and we'll go ahead and do this right now uh is going to be the cost if we put the price chart up here again I don't know why the 950x why today as of filming was 708 it's up that makes no sense cuz everything else is pretty much down across the board but the 285k is coming in at $589 Amazon price uh well technically launch price Amazon doesn't have it up there yet cuz this is before the launch the12 900k is $277 on Amazon again you can actually get a bundle at Micro Center if you're near one for that price that comes with a motherboard and Ram uh if you look at the 7800x 3D $476 so again that's inflated that's higher than MSRP it has been ever since it became the goat hopefully the 9800 X 3D when it comes out can bring that price back to reality but it's a hard sale at 500 at 589 for gamers you need to be doing mixed workloads and tasks to make it really worth it to you and that's only going to be if you're not willing to take on some of the nuances maybe of going with like a 950x but again 950x is much more expensive most people are not going to want to go with 1300k or, 1400k out of fear and that's a that's a reasonable thing to consider is with everything you've heard unless you're buying it brand spanking new you got a brand spinking new CPU from the store you got a brand spanking new motherboard you update the BIOS from day one then you can probably trust it probably probably I'm not going to go on record as saying you can trust it trust me trust me bro I'm not going to do that so I think 13 and 1400k is out of the question for a lot of people so what are you left with well you're left with these CPUs that you can see right here with the price point and you're going to have some nuances that come with AMD for instance the new 9000 Series 900k and 950k have core parking if you want an x3d CPU so you get the best of both worlds you get cor parking what we're left with now is an idea of what the future looks like for CPUs which is going to be tiled SL building blocks of CPUs now so you can scale up scale down new Graphics come out in the future for for Intel they can just plop that sucker on if the core design hasn't changed yet uh they come out with better more efficient ecores they could just plop those on I mean that's the cool thing about Tile Design is you can scale it which is what AMD said eight years ago welcome to the game Intel uh anyway that's it for today I'm going to get on out of here I'm excited to test the 265k though I also am really looking forward to pushing some overclocks on this I haven't touched any of that maybe that'll help I don't know I have no idea what to expect overclocking on this is a completely different animal and I'm being told push the ecores up 5 to 600 MHz peor is a little bit but I'm being told push the ecores to see real gains and I'm hoping that will help bring up some of the gaming performance but if I have to do that out of the box that doesn't that's not great for Intel all right guys thanks for watching sound off down below how you feel about this um I'm happy to I'm happy to see that they might have a a range rains on the overclocking SL Auto overvolting problem that was killing stuff this appears to be at least the test I threw at it it's it is a ceiling with voltage and with uh with power draw so that's good to see anyway thanks for watching guys as always we'll see you in the next onewelcome to the very first video in the new testing lab or shop or whatever the hell we're going to call it it's not really a lab I bet you never guess what we've been testing today's video is brought to you by the new really super cool Jus sense melty connector shirt you know paying tribute to one of the best designs that's clearly ever existed and if you don't like the vapor wave colors we' got our OG gray and red colors available now so get yours by following the link in the description below nice ow I have a thigh cramp all right So today we're going to kick things off with the 285k that we were testing here actually in the Falcon Northwest Talon PC uh I want to give a huge shout out to those guys they definitely helped me out with a lot of this testing kind of getting me ready before uh we went through all of it so I kind of knew some of the nuances that we were dealing with so this Talon system right here is absolutely Bonkers spec it's not cheap this is a $7,500 Tower but it has everything down to a raid zero with three 2 tbte nvme Gen 5 drives giving us 19,000 megabytes per second read and write it was actually writing at that speed as well which is freaking crazy RTX 49d Founders Edition obviously the 285k is in there um I'll put a link to Falcon Northwest systems down below they were instrumental and and kind of helping me get ready for this review so I it's not a review of the system per se it's a review of the CPU um obviously when I did any of our testing when I put this out of the out of there right now I took all the panels off I took the side panel off so there was no case interaction whatsoever with the cooling uh in terms of having it affect The Thermals in any way so it's basically an open chassis if you will also it is running their 280 mm AIO um not a 360 AO which I tend to usually test with but if you go back to our AO testing charts that we did a while back you can see that the differences are actually very small between a 280 and a 360 so keep that in mind also too because the architecture type is completely different on aerol Lake than it is on Raptor Lake uh they wouldn't have been directly comparable anyway because of a whole new layout of the core and whatnot so as we compare test moving forward our 285 uh temperatures and stuff will kind of be redone with the 360 AIO and then any future AOL Lake CPUs that come out will be done with matching exact configuration so I want to point that out there uh specs will cover in a high level obviously our 245k video will be coming later because we had to get the lab and everything set up uh all time went into that getting ourselves up and functioning and to be able to put in the amazing amount of hours it takes to test these CPUs uh so anyway bear with us the 245k is coming 265k is the one that Intel did not send us which is unfortunate because that's the CPU that we kind of feel like would have been more or less the coste effective forward-facing gaming CPU on aerol Lake architecture um anyway moving on it's a 24 core part with there's no more hyperthreading we talked about that our initial specs video uh Intel said no more now we are doing physical core per physical thread so that's it it's a 24 core which is eight P cores 16 e e cores and as you move down the stack you're going to notice what they tend to do is just kind of chop the ecores off of the tiles rather than really losing too many peores so up to 5.7 GHz uh turbo frequency on single core EC cor max turbo frequency is 4.3 36 meab megabytes of L3 cache it's got XE LPG intern uh integrated Graphics obviously with a base wattage of 150 however on the performance profile which is what we did all of our testing on uh it's 250 Watts technically it's down 3 Watts from like Raptor Lake and um the 139 1300k 1400k being at 253 Watt on the pl1 pl2 three Watts down uh anyway not to be confused with Three Doors Down yeah I hate myself tooe don't worry I'm going to go ahead and kind of do a too long didn't read before we get into the charts here it's actually really good asterisk gaming is totally separate from productivity when it comes to this CPU and just like first gen ryzen it is not exactly the CPU you want to take home to Mom and brag about when it comes to gaming it's not great and it is definitely a lateral somewhat backwards move to anyone currently running anything newer than a 12900 K so if you're out on a 13900 K possibly even a 137 we didn't test 700 series yet against this we have to go back and redo all of our testing for multiple reasons one you guys ate me alive for using 5200 MHz dims on our last CPU test because of the fact that that was the official supported like Like official supported memory uh so everything was redone on 6,000 MHz memory also too the a lake platform was tested using udm not CM so we are not using clocked driver memory we are using standard ddr5 memory because I wanted to remove any sort of variable from comparing the architecture to the previous architecture by making sure that the ram was not playing a part in any sort of performance uplift so CM versus udm testing will be coming in the future because that requires us going through every single bit of it again and I'm okay with that actually I'm enjoying going through and doing all this sort of testing I've also made sure that I'm trying to give you guys more important data so today we tested things like thermals we tested power draw um we tested on on 14900 K hyperthreading on and hyperthreading off uh to compare any of the the temperature changes because what I started to say about the fact that it's good is the fact that in compute it's a monster it is it is a monster at compute it just dominated the charts at a core deficit so if that doesn't tell you how much of an improvement Intel has been able to sort of manufacture I'll back up we won't talk about manufacturing just yet but for Intel to be able to design shows that their their core toe architecture Improvement down at this 3 NM process is actually pretty good the fact that we are at eight less threads 24 thread versus 32 thread previous gen and beating it and clocking higher is is actually pretty damn impressive we think it's so impressive because Intel's not making it I guess that's what it took to make it really good is the fact that Intel is not manufacturing it it's tsmc that's a little scary cuz that means tsmc is now making everything except the little bit of the market that Samsung is currently manufacturing for so the same Fab is now making Intel and AMD and Nvidia so you all want to get like really think about who the monster is when it comes to Tech it's not Nvidia it's not Intel it's not Apple it's not AMD it's tsmc apparently they were having a problem with their process so they were like you know what screw it we'll have tsmc manufacture this node for us and we'll move on to trying to manufacture or design our next thing okay anyway moving on however it's not great at gaming and the reason for that is it goes back to like first gen ryzen and I talked about this in our initial overhead video when it talked about specs and stuff that it's kind of like in order for the process to get better and in in order for the improvements to happen you got to start somewhere it's it's kind of like when the first multi-core CPUs came out like penum d right or you got the Phenom platform that came out with the AMD way back in the day no software utilized more than one core at the time and all the discussion was that that's stupid why you buying something that can't be used well the tile designs now are something that are creating nuances when it comes to schedulers instructions and everything else to have to start to be able to utilize these the way that the tiling is in this the the CCD chiplet design on AMD or the tiling design on Intel creates new nuances and then when it comes to gaming that nuances actually increase latency so it's about 17 to 20 nond slower when it comes to in that increased latency uh than than prior so and that actually shows in games let's go ahead and go get right into our charts we'll start with the compute stuff because that's where it's impressive now speaking of schedulers and instructions and all that sort of stuff we are on the latest uh H 24 H2 all the latest updates for AMD um and we compared them to our old charts it was actually a pretty big uplift there was actually a smaller uplift going from 5200 megat transfer Ram to 6,000 megat transfer Ram cl30 than there was going from old 22 H2 or 23 H2 to 24 H2 like that was that was actually a pretty large Improvement but that affects all ryzen CPUs going all the way back to like 5,000 series and possibly even older so every ryzen CPU saw an improvement so if you've been waiting on 24 H2 and haven't been installing it and you're running a ryen CPU you might see as much as 10 to 12% Improvement across the board minimum FPS average FPS it all comes up so it's like getting the another tier of CPU for free so just want to point that out there all of our testing is done on the latest um okay so let's go ahead and start with uh I I don't know let's start with something simple let's let's do cin bench r231 thread and we'll kind of work our way to newer as we go so as you can see right here the 285k the P denotes that we're on the performance profile I did not test that extreme profile because I went through about half of our suite and then I noticed that there was like pretty much no improvement because it still went to 250 watts and didn't push itself anything any beyond that what extreme profile really does is lift the limits not the clock speeds or any of that that's aailable to it but it lifts the limits so that you can start to play around with overclocking so by seeing no improvements by just selecting extreme profile I just left it at performance when we do our overclocking stuff we'll have to enable extreme profile to get a little extra Headroom when it comes to things like voltage and power limit uh but it's not much because of dlvr which I've already talked about which is the um digital linear voltage regulator which is there to make sure that motherboard manufacturers are not pushing these things out of out of the box without you going through a whole series of safety that you have to remove uh before you can even have a chance of potentially hurting this but we are going to be looking at voltage and all that you'll see those charts in a moment here um so men R23 one thread as you can imagine it's doing pretty damn good I mean look at the distance between the 149 and the 285 um if we look at the cine bench R23 multi-thread score it's a huge jump actually in fact the 14900 K and 13900 K saw a reduction in score when the whole Intel problem happened because of the fact that so many of our test platforms were automatically pushing the limits to unlimited watts and unlimited power draw because motherboard manufacturers were trying to have an edge or a one up on other manufacturer to the point to where they just ended up removing all limits so as soon as Intel put the re back on pretty much all 13th and 14th gen saw a performance reduction whereas all AMD CPUs with Windows updates saw an improvement that's the world we live in folks anyway moving on 42311 that is crazy I could only get that if I had like a 340 wat uh power limit enabled on a 1400 K with like open loop water cooling and going in there and doing extreme voltage tuning to try and push the clocks now in terms of clock speeds I didn't do a clock speed chart but I want to tell you right now on the all core I was seeing 5.3 GHz all core out of the box touching nothing at the 250 W power limit the 14900 K does not do that at the 250 3 watt it drops to about 4950 53 was advertised out of the box but really unless you can keep the temps very under control which is very hard to do with a 149 uh yeah 42311 it's pretty nuts the 950x was super impressive at over 40,000 and then the 285 came in at again an 8 core deficit and just did a very good job actually if we take a look at r24 which takes advantage of a the more modern kind of process uh you can see the 285 on on top again um you can see the 149 139 underneath the 9950 9900 which is kind of exactly as our testing for the 9000 Series showed all of our 9,000 tests like I said were redone so keep that in mind this are not old old uh scores and then multi-thread it is it is way out in the lead right there 9950 X right behind 14900 and the 7950 X 139 uh yeah so when it comes to compute it definitely is having no problems whatsoever uh getting the job done so if we look at the blender test though only a marginal improvement over the 950x but again if we compare the prices though um the price of the 950x kind of went up which is weird cuz I've heard reports that it actually went down but I checked actually as of the filming this video to make my price chart it's $78 it went up from $649 to 708 which doesn't make sense cuz every like the 9900x the 7950 X the 700x they all went down but the 950x went up so maybe it's be it's kind of like the 7800 x3d being the goat at gaming maybe the 950x is just the goat at certain compute type stuff that there's a I know sub subset of Industry out there that is just buying those CPUs up because they're getting the job done better than Intel which is the only reason I can make sense that that price would go up but pricing is volatile it changes every single day uh so monster as you can see a marginal lead like a junk shop the 950x is destroying where the 285 fell below the 7950 X so if we look at classroom though then it splits the difference it's just just under the 950x and just above the 7950 X still impressive if you consider the fact that it's an 8 core deficit but now you have to consider the price difference between these two CPUs now uh the 285k coming in at about $150 cheaper than the today pricing of the 9950 uh X so now if you look at geekbench single thread um I I don't know much about how the single thread testing what it's doing actually to test that single thread but you can see the 950x and the 9900x which are the same core is just a slightly different core clock um both bested the 285k at the performance profile with no overclocking but if we look at the multi-threading then the 285k jumps way out in the lead by uh 1,300 points so 22702 versus a 2,481 a multi-thread so those ecores man they really do like 16 of them there's an army of ecores on this thing which just it's kind of insane so if you look at handbreak the 285k came in at 52 seconds with the next best CPU being the 950x at 58 so that's nearly 10% faster than the 950x at transcode now it's a 4K video 3 minute 4K video transcode it down to 1080p um the poor 7800 X 3D down there it's the it's the best gaming CPU but it is unfortunately just running with its with a both of its legs tied together when it comes to compute stuff but that's not why you buy it you don't buy it for that you buy it for games and that's what we're going to look at next so I use six different titles when it comes to games cuz they all have different types of engines some are older some are newer some have different caps we run them in a bottlenecking config what I mean by that is we're running 1080p medium settings uh no sort of uh it's like we're trying to keep the frames per second as high as possible 4090 running with a Max fan profile just as cool as possible to keep the Boost clocks as high as possible no overclocking on the GPU only because of the fact that um out of the box is definitely enough to be able to to Bott L these CPUs so if you start with Borderland 3 it's kind of interesting apparently there's about a 363 FPS cap on that engine cuz the top four CPUs are within one FPS of each other 363s 363 363 and 362 with the goat obviously coming into the 7800 x3d followed by the 13900 K followed by the 950x the 285k actually comes in second to last place only a few 13 FPS faster than a 12 900k that's when I went oh okay uh sanity checked everything made sure the ram was running at the right speed made sure it was all boosting properly it's going to the 250 watt clock speeds are going where they're supposed to go it's just like holy cow that's actually not that was less than expected in fact he even ran these tests multiple times to make sure that everything looked correct here cyberpunk 2077 7800 x3d at the top who would who would have guessed that even even it's second it's even second best when it comes to the minimum FPS so 78 7800 x3d so the 285k is coming in at 22 FPS average behind the 7800x 3D man that 3D vcash I'll tell you what uh even the minimum if you look is not that great it's just everything has slid down again one of those t one of those titles that just definitely doesn't seem to be leveraging the architecture uh F1 2024 very high FPS game uh with our settings 7800 x3d coming in at just under 500 FPS 285k bottom of the top of the bottom half at 426 I mean even the minimum if you look 404 versus 318 you know I Intel wasn't advertising that this is going to be a an amazing gaming CPU but um yeah there's definitely going to have to be some improvement ments happening here to really give it some uplift I'm wondering if there might need to be some windows type of schedu or improvements like resin saw recently to really bring out the full potential of this CPU um moving on to Horizon zero Dawn we've got uh 700 x3d at the top once again by a fair margin and the 285 coming in dead last 283 FPS for the 700 or 7800 x3d 220 f FPS for the 285k in performance profile 63 FPS average diff difference that's like a whole tier and a half almost two tiers of GPU difference so soon as we soon as we ask the CPU to handle a severe workload it definitely shows and the same thing is sort of present here in Shadow of the Tomb Raider so 7800 x3d at 355 a average FPS 285k coming in at 288 so again like 60-ish 60 something you put it on the screen FPS difference there so if we look at the time by extreme CPU score though 14,1 one or 166 which is exactly 1,00 points above the 9950 X so it's weird and like compute tasks with that 36 megabytes of cash and then its tile design and the EC cor is really being leveraged very well in games or excuse me in in compute task it does very well but as soon as you ask it to do G ging I think there's some maturity that's going to have to happen there uh anyway let's go ahead and talk about some of the charts now because I wanted to test things like thermals and power draw and and whatnot so temperature testing in R23 or cinebench R23 pretty impressive actually I mean just under ADC on the average bumping over it a few times um this is just a 10minute temperature test 22c ambient what's impressive is the fact that it's not a big curve when it comes to like averaging out its temperature you know sometimes we talk about about it takes a while to climb this shows it's not really saturating the coolant it means the a the 280 AO was more than big enough to keep the CPU tame the new TJ Maxx is 105 it's 105c so it's up 5c from previous gen but we we're seeing about a 10 to almost 15c drop between where the 14900 K launched at again the 253 profile uh was not like the launch profile we saw so we saw almost every CPU 1400k and 1300k hitting the 100 C Max out of the box regardless of what kind of AI you had um but out of the box now we're seeing this thing definitely has the safeguards in place and you'll see that but what before we get to that the temperature curve is very flat like a little curve at the beginning and then it's flat but look at the end of the test as soon as the test is done it drops under 40c instantly so that shows you that's just an extremely efficient type of heat uh extraction if you will out of the IHS design now for funsies I want to see what happen if I took the 14900 K and did a comparison between hyperthreading on and hyperthreading off to see if this is where a lot of the temperature improvements were coming from on core Ultra 9 or core 9 Ultra 285 the new so anyway as you can see with the hyperthreading on pretty standard we're up in the high 7s low 80s uh in the uh cin bench R23 and as soon as I turned off hyperthreading not only did we obviously lose uh a bit of performance I didn't put a score up here but you can see we lost about eight ° C now as you can see it's bouncing around obviously as as the temperature you know progresses and the test progresses but on the high side the biggest gaps I was seeing about 11c difference and then on the more average gaps if we average out like a rolling average of temps it's more like 7 to 8C difference between the two so although there is a temperature drop by turning off hyperthreading uh obviously I think some of the core architecture is more responsible for a lot of the temperature drop not just the fact that there's no hyperthreading in fact if you have an Intel CPU with hyperthreading you can turn yours on and off in the Bios and you'll see the same kind of changes or difference that we just showed you here um if we take a look at the voltage though so this is the same 10-minute R23 test multi-thread test uh you can see that it spikes above 1.2 just a little bit but again you can tell 1.2 is like the hard limit 1.2 volts is like where it's saying don't try and go beyond that I saw 1. 227 which is the highest Spike you see on here so at the beginning of this test when you see the bunch of fluctuations that's when I started the logging but I hadn't started the test yet so you're going to see fluctuations B based on background tasks that are taking place but as soon as the test starts you see it is locked now these low spikes that you're seeing is actually between the tests so as soon as the test is done it that load is dropped and like I showed you at the end of the temperature test how fast the temperature drops if you take a look at the voltage you can see because the voltage drops so drastically uh that's why the temperature drops like that so it drops to like it's like 08 85 or so average when you're just doing normal stuff so it's actually pretty impressive how low they're able to keep the volts on this but again the fact there's no hyperthreading actually helps a lot with thermals and it helps a lot with the voltage uh this is a 10-minute power test now you can see each major dip again is every time C bench restarts itself but look at just how steady the power is at 250 watt like that you can tell now it's it's definitely adhering to the wattage limit uh um that shows it's obviously active out of the box didn't change the power profile miss it did come with the performance profile profile going automatically now we're going to use occt which is a more varying kind of test it does uh AVX instruction but it kind of varies the way that that load is so instead of O uh C bench R23 which does a very consistent drawing in the picture and then restarts the test this is more consistent now where you're not going to see these drops and temp but you can see the temperature fluctuates kind of all over the place but it's going up and down right on that ADC line so we're getting nearly 25 C of Headroom before we would ever start to see any sort of clock variation one thing I want to point out at the start of the cinebench R23 test usually by the end of the test we would see at least one or two turbo bins if you will of clock reduction on Intel it would start at like 52 53 and by the end of the test it's like 4950 like we've talked about you would see the test scores drop as it goes what I noticed here was an cinch R23 5.3 locked on the P course 4.3 locked on the eour did not fluctuate it stayed across the board so I think that's why in compute we're seeing some really good uplift and performance too because there's less clock variation uh and then you can see what the temperatures here in occt just how true that is and check out the voltage in occt can you tell where the ceiling is 1.2 it went above 1.2 one time at the start of the test and it's actually when it loaded the test and it went to like 1 . 23 and then 1.2 is exactly it looks like it hits the ceiling it is perfectly flat no fluctuations above it at all which is good um and then if we take a look at the package power here it is occt it just looks like a table because of the fact that it is 253 or excuse me 250 watt is all you get you're not getting no more unless you go in and modify that with the extreme profile which I have not done yet so let's talk about games though cuz gaming is where you're going to spend a lot of your time at least my audience here so you can see if we take a look at the cyberpunk 2077 temperature test and sitting there with uh pretty much I did 1440p ultra settings with the 4090 I put it in a more real use case where the GPU is definitely going to be our our bound 1440p probably not fully bound with a 4090 another a good trade-off between CPU and GPU but look at the temperatures you see the spikes in the start of the test that's when the the game was loading that's why I'm in the menu and all that and then as soon as the game starts you can see we're staying in between 50 and 60c across the board now I was kind of curious what that meant for the core voltages because just like we talked about when the clocks go up especially single core up to 5.7 the voltage has to go up to support that too so I monitored the voltage on PE core 13 and the reason why I mon monitored 13 is that is the identified best core in the set now speaking of P cor 13 you might be like well wait a minute there's not 13 peores I think Hardware info needs some updates because because if you actually look at the The Ordering of it and 13 and 14 900k 1200k all the peores are listed as a block and then all the eor is under that but this was like peor peor eore eore eore peor eore eore peor peor eore e it was like random numbering so peor 13 is the 13 lucky number 13 is the one that was identified though as the as the favored thread so that's the that's going to be the thread that's doing the most work versus the the whole bunch of the CPU so so and what do you see right here a little bit of a heartbeat at the start while we're test while we're starting the game and then again 1.2 across the board it's actually pretty impressive how well they're able to keep the voltage and stuff under control you know the kind of stuff consumers expected in the last gen I guess maybe we're asking too much here and then if we take a look at package power you can see it's pulling about 120 watt 123 Watts uh spikes up over 150 at the start again when I'm loading the test and or the game and then once the game is loaded you you can see right there you'll see a little dip there that's when I tabbed out for a second just to check uh something on Hardware info and I went back so that's why there's a dip right there but once again as as soon as you stop the game it's only drawing about 18 Watts at idle so it's it's pretty impressive so yeah there we go that's the 285k I was hoping for more in games I truly was and again this is only a sample of six games there's there's going to be all kinds of crazy variations in in gaming I mean I didn't see person Al any of the uplift in some games like intel was talking about in their slides I definitely saw the fact that compared to the 13 and 14900 K I saw a pretty much across theboard reduction in performance versus those CPUs at least in these these six titles so this is when I would highly recommend you go and watch other channels to get as much I know you already do but get as much information as you can from different testing methodologies for folks to to give you kind of a good idea of this is a CPU that's right for you what I recommend this CPU that that is a big loaded question let me say why compared to like the 12 900k and whatnot it's an upgrade compute wise anything that needs CPU intensity yes when it comes to games even some of the games were not like it wasn't that much better than a 12900 K I still think getting a 12 900k bundle at like the 270 bucks or whatever I got it for at Micro Center with a motherboard and RAM that's the value right there I would buy that system if I was running a really old system like a 6 gen or you know 40 47 770k or something old like really old even a 9900k I would go to like a 12900 I would skip this gen you would have to be running something very old and need that level of compute performance to really be able to justify the cost of it because the one thing we didn't talk about here and we'll go ahead and do this right now uh is going to be the cost if we put the price chart up here again I don't know why the 950x why today as of filming was 708 it's up that makes no sense cuz everything else is pretty much down across the board but the 285k is coming in at $589 Amazon price uh well technically launch price Amazon doesn't have it up there yet cuz this is before the launch the12 900k is $277 on Amazon again you can actually get a bundle at Micro Center if you're near one for that price that comes with a motherboard and Ram uh if you look at the 7800x 3D $476 so again that's inflated that's higher than MSRP it has been ever since it became the goat hopefully the 9800 X 3D when it comes out can bring that price back to reality but it's a hard sale at 500 at 589 for gamers you need to be doing mixed workloads and tasks to make it really worth it to you and that's only going to be if you're not willing to take on some of the nuances maybe of going with like a 950x but again 950x is much more expensive most people are not going to want to go with 1300k or, 1400k out of fear and that's a that's a reasonable thing to consider is with everything you've heard unless you're buying it brand spanking new you got a brand spinking new CPU from the store you got a brand spanking new motherboard you update the BIOS from day one then you can probably trust it probably probably I'm not going to go on record as saying you can trust it trust me trust me bro I'm not going to do that so I think 13 and 1400k is out of the question for a lot of people so what are you left with well you're left with these CPUs that you can see right here with the price point and you're going to have some nuances that come with AMD for instance the new 9000 Series 900k and 950k have core parking if you want an x3d CPU so you get the best of both worlds you get cor parking what we're left with now is an idea of what the future looks like for CPUs which is going to be tiled SL building blocks of CPUs now so you can scale up scale down new Graphics come out in the future for for Intel they can just plop that sucker on if the core design hasn't changed yet uh they come out with better more efficient ecores they could just plop those on I mean that's the cool thing about Tile Design is you can scale it which is what AMD said eight years ago welcome to the game Intel uh anyway that's it for today I'm going to get on out of here I'm excited to test the 265k though I also am really looking forward to pushing some overclocks on this I haven't touched any of that maybe that'll help I don't know I have no idea what to expect overclocking on this is a completely different animal and I'm being told push the ecores up 5 to 600 MHz peor is a little bit but I'm being told push the ecores to see real gains and I'm hoping that will help bring up some of the gaming performance but if I have to do that out of the box that doesn't that's not great for Intel all right guys thanks for watching sound off down below how you feel about this um I'm happy to I'm happy to see that they might have a a range rains on the overclocking SL Auto overvolting problem that was killing stuff this appears to be at least the test I threw at it it's it is a ceiling with voltage and with uh with power draw so that's good to see anyway thanks for watching guys as always we'll see you in the next one\n"