**The Freedom to Create: How Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels' Director Taught Me About Filmmaking**
When it comes to filmmaking, there are many decisions that need to be made when bringing a script to life. One of the most crucial decisions is whether or not to focus group the film, which can lead to homogenization and a loss of creative control. In his opinion, director Guy Ritchie never had to resort to focus grouping his movie Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. "I didn't have to focus group it to death," he said. "I didn't have to homogenize my movie like that." He attributes this to the fact that he was working on a lower budget than some of his other films, such as Chronicles, which gave him the freedom to make the film he wanted.
This approach allowed Ritchie to create a film that was true to himself and his vision. "I just liked locking picture when I wanted to lock picture," he said. "There's the cut, let's go now." This approach also meant that Ritchie had more creative control over the final product, which is often lacking in big-budget films. When asked if there were any scenes that would have had to be cut out in order to achieve a PG-13 rating, Ritchie replied that he knew it was possible, but that working with a lower budget gave him the freedom to do whatever he wanted.
One of the key factors that allowed Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels to be made on a smaller budget was advances in technology. While effects can still blow a budget quickly, Ritchie has found ways to work around this by going straight to independent houses with talented people instead of big studios. This approach has not only helped him stay within budget but also pushed the boundaries of what is possible on a smaller scale. "I've got 850 visual effect shots in the movie," he said. "But it's just about care, not running to ILM or Wether to do your effects."
Ritchie credits his ability to work efficiently with his post-production pipeline as a key factor in getting the film made quickly. When asked how he is able to move so fast, Ritchie replied that it all starts with having a short script. "I go in with 106 pages," he said. "Not trying to shoot 120 or 125 because I know I'm going to lose time anyway in the editing room." This approach allows him to streamline his process and get on set quickly.
Another key factor in Ritchie's ability to move fast is the caliber of his actors. He only works with people who want to work, which means that he can shoot quickly without having to worry about dealing with divas or difficult personalities. "Actors who want to work show up on time," he said. "Want to work, can you see yourself shooting like a native?" This approach has allowed Ritchie to create films that are truly unique and memorable.
Finally, when it comes to the debate between digital and film, Ritchie takes a clear stance. In his opinion, there is an aesthetic difference between the two mediums that cannot be ignored. "I'm just doing it because I know I have to move fast," he said. "I know my post-production pipeline will be streamlined if I shoot digitally." However, he also believes that film has its own unique qualities and should not be dismissed outright.
**The Camera: A Key Factor in Ritchie's Workflow**
Ritchie credits his camera of choice, the Alexa, with being a key factor in his ability to work efficiently. "We could afford it," he said. "We could afford two or three camera bodies." This allowed him to move quickly and seamlessly between shots without having to worry about switching cameras. Ritchie also praised the camera's digital capabilities, which allowed him to streamline his post-production pipeline.
My DP who is a film guy says next show Alexa there you go," he said. "I think the tide has turned on that." This suggests that the industry is starting to recognize the benefits of working with digital cameras and technology. For Ritchie, this means being able to work quickly and creatively without having to compromise his vision.
**Conclusion**
In conclusion, Guy Ritchie's approach to filmmaking is centered around creative freedom and efficiency. By working on a lower budget than some of his other films, he was able to focus on the film that he wanted to make rather than trying to please everyone else. His ability to work quickly and efficiently has been key to getting Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels made, as well as his use of digital technology.
For Ritchie, the choice between digital and film is not just about which medium to use but also about aesthetics. He believes that there are aesthetic differences between the two mediums that cannot be ignored. By embracing this approach and working with the right people, Ritchie has been able to create films that are truly unique and memorable.
As for his future plans, Ritchie says that he would love to work on more films using digital technology. However, he also believes in the importance of film as an art form. "I'm just doing it because I know I have to move fast," he said. "But at the end of the day, I'm a filmmaker who loves film."