The DOJ is Suing AT&T to Stop Its Merger with Time Warner

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against AT&T, one of the largest wireless and broadband companies in the country, to stop its merger with Time Warner. This move comes as the government is concerned that the combined company will use its market power to unfairly jack up prices for competitors, ultimately leading to higher prices for consumers.

AT&T is already a dominant player in the industry, controlling internet access for millions of consumers. Meanwhile, Time Warner is one of the major media brands in the US, owning popular content like HBO's Game of Thrones. The fear here from the Justice Department is that this combined company will use its market power to stifle competition and increase prices.

However, AT&T and Time Warner argue that this merger has nothing to do with trying to run their competitors out of business. They claim that they see companies like Amazon and Netflix as their competitors in the future, and that they need to combine efforts in order to be able to compete in this new media landscape. The two companies believe that by merging, they will be able to create a more competitive market and provide better services to consumers.

There is also speculation about President Trump's role in blocking the merger. It was reported from the campaign trail that Trump said he would block the deal because it would put too much control in the hands of one company. However, many are questioning whether Trump's motivations for blocking the deal are truly related to concerns over antitrust laws or if it is simply a way to punish CNN, which is owned by Time Warner.

This case raises questions about the government's selective enforcement of antitrust laws. While companies like Comcast and NBC Universal were allowed to merge in the past without issue, the DOJ seems to be taking a closer look at AT&T's merger with Time Warner. The DOJ has stated that it will enforce its antitrust laws in a fair and consistent manner, but some are arguing that this case is an example of selective enforcement.

The media landscape is changing rapidly, with more people cutting the cord and streaming content from services like Netflix and Amazon. This shift has forced companies like AT&T to look for new revenue streams and find ways to compete in the market. The wireless industry is also experiencing a price war, which has driven down prices and forced companies to seek out new opportunities.

The outcome of this case will have significant implications for consumers who are looking for access to popular content. Will AT&T and Time Warner be able to provide the shows that people want to watch, or will other companies fill this gap? The answer to this question may be determined by the outcome of this lawsuit, which is expected to shape the future of the media landscape.

In conclusion, the DOJ's decision to sue AT&T over its merger with Time Warner has significant implications for consumers and the media industry as a whole. As the case makes its way through the courts, it will be important to follow developments and see how this situation unfolds.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enthe DOJ is suing AT&T to stop its merger with Time Warner AT&T is one of the largest wireless and broadband companies in the country and it already controls Internet access for millions of consumers meanwhile Time Warner is one of the major media brands in the u.s. it owns popular content like HBO's Game of Thrones and so the fear here from the Justice Department is that this combined company will use its market power to unfairly jack up prices for competitors and this will ultimately lead to higher prices for consumers ATT and Time Warner say this has nothing to do with trying to run their competitors out of business this is about survival they see companies like Amazon and Netflix as their competitors of the future so in order for them to be able to compete in this new media landscape they really need to combine efforts it's no secret that President Trump is no fan of CNN which is owned by Time Warner and when this deal was first announced Trump said from the campaign trail that he would block it he said that it would put too much control in the hands of one company but a lot of people are wondering if Trump who is usually very pro-business is really just getting the DOJ to block this deal to punish CNN that's a really great question and it's one that AT&T and Time Warner's lawyers have been asking they say that Comcast is also a very large broadband company NBC Universal was also a really big media brand and the government seemed to be fine allowing those two companies to combine and so they say that it looks like the data DOJ is selectively deciding when to enforce its antitrust laws however this case shakes out it's a big deal for consumers the media landscape is changing so drastically and so dramatically people are no longer subscribing to paid TV services instead you've got a lot of cord cutting and people streaming content from places like Netflix and Amazon so it's completely changed things and meanwhile the wireless industry is in an all-out price war which has been driving down prices and forcing companies like AT&T to look for revenue and other places and all of this has been really great for consumers but where do things go from here who's going to be the company that that offers the shows that you want to watch and that is in part I think going to be answered by the outcome of this case so stay tunedthe DOJ is suing AT&T to stop its merger with Time Warner AT&T is one of the largest wireless and broadband companies in the country and it already controls Internet access for millions of consumers meanwhile Time Warner is one of the major media brands in the u.s. it owns popular content like HBO's Game of Thrones and so the fear here from the Justice Department is that this combined company will use its market power to unfairly jack up prices for competitors and this will ultimately lead to higher prices for consumers ATT and Time Warner say this has nothing to do with trying to run their competitors out of business this is about survival they see companies like Amazon and Netflix as their competitors of the future so in order for them to be able to compete in this new media landscape they really need to combine efforts it's no secret that President Trump is no fan of CNN which is owned by Time Warner and when this deal was first announced Trump said from the campaign trail that he would block it he said that it would put too much control in the hands of one company but a lot of people are wondering if Trump who is usually very pro-business is really just getting the DOJ to block this deal to punish CNN that's a really great question and it's one that AT&T and Time Warner's lawyers have been asking they say that Comcast is also a very large broadband company NBC Universal was also a really big media brand and the government seemed to be fine allowing those two companies to combine and so they say that it looks like the data DOJ is selectively deciding when to enforce its antitrust laws however this case shakes out it's a big deal for consumers the media landscape is changing so drastically and so dramatically people are no longer subscribing to paid TV services instead you've got a lot of cord cutting and people streaming content from places like Netflix and Amazon so it's completely changed things and meanwhile the wireless industry is in an all-out price war which has been driving down prices and forcing companies like AT&T to look for revenue and other places and all of this has been really great for consumers but where do things go from here who's going to be the company that that offers the shows that you want to watch and that is in part I think going to be answered by the outcome of this case so stay tuned\n"