The Push for Power Efficiency: AMD's Road to Gaming Supremacy

AMD is on the cusp of achieving gaming supremacy, and one way they're doing it is by pushing the boundaries of power efficiency. According to WCCF Tech, AMD's new RDNA 3 architecture leverages a five-nanometer process and chip packaging design that results in 50% better performance per watt than its predecessor, RDNA 2.

This new architecture redefines AMD's adaptive power management technology, setting workload-specific operating points to ensure each component of the GPU uses only the power it requires for optimal performance. The result is a true leader in efficiency, with AMD RDNA 3 and Radeon graphics offering unparalleled levels of performance and efficiency.

The Power of Physics: Understanding the Limitations

One of the biggest challenges in modern graphics processing is the fundamental limitations imposed by physics. As Peter Palczynski notes, "the demand for gaming and compute performance is accelerating, while the underlying process technology is slowing down." This means that power levels will continue to rise as manufacturers try to keep pace with consumer demands.

The Moore's Law Myth

Peter also notes that Moore's Law, which states that computing power doubles approximately every two years, is no longer applicable. Instead, "performance is King," and manufacturers must find ways to increase performance without sacrificing efficiency. This means that AMD will need to push the boundaries of power efficiency to stay competitive.

The Competition: Nvidia's Response

Nvidia has been a major player in the graphics market for years, and their 40 series of GPUs offers some impressive features. However, AMD is determined to close the gap. According to Palczynski, "the only negative aspect of RDNA 3 versus Nvidia is that it doesn't match the RT performance capability of the 4090." However, this is not a major concern for many gamers, who are more interested in performance and price than advanced features like Ray Tracing.

The Price Factor: A Game-Changer

One of the biggest challenges facing AMD is the cost of their new GPUs. The 7900 XT, for example, may be priced at $1,000, which is significantly higher than Nvidia's equivalent GPU. However, if AMD can manage to reduce production costs and make their GPUs more affordable, they may be able to attract a wider audience.

The Future of Chiplet Design

One area where AMD is making significant strides is in chiplet design. According to Palczynski, this approach allows manufacturers to create custom designs without having to die-cut individual chips. This means that AMD can produce a wide range of GPUs with different features and performance levels, all while keeping costs down.

The Benefits of Faster Memory

Another area where AMD is making significant improvements is in memory technology. The new RDNA 3 architecture includes faster and more efficient memory, which should result in improved performance and reduced power consumption.

A Roadmap to Efficiency

AMD has a multi-year roadmap for improving efficiency, with the goal of reducing power consumption by 50% or more. According to Palczynski, "the trend is clear: the architecture is not moving as fast as the demand for performance." This means that AMD will need to continue pushing the boundaries of power efficiency in order to stay competitive.

The Verdict

AMD's new RDNA 3 architecture and Radeon graphics offer a truly impressive combination of performance and efficiency. With their focus on power efficiency, AMD is well-positioned to take on Nvidia and become the leader in the gaming market. However, the competition will be fierce, and it remains to be seen whether AMD can deliver on their promises and stay ahead of the curve.

A Final Note

As Peter Palczynski notes, "the price is what's going to matter now." If AMD can manage to reduce production costs and make their GPUs more affordable, they may be able to attract a wider audience and take the lead in the gaming market. Only time will tell if AMD can deliver on their promises and become the supreme force in graphics processing.

And that's all for today, folks! We'll see you at CES next week, where we'll have our ear to the ground for any updates on the latest developments in the world of graphics processing. Don't forget to hit that like button and subscribe for more content, and if you're thinking about getting into gaming or upgrading your system, be sure to check out some of the links in the description below.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enokay it's our DNA rumor Roundup time uh it's no surprise or no secret that uh amd's hosting an event in Las Vegas uh at the beginning of November and I give you guys basically three guesses that you but you only need one as to what it's going to be about ndxc canvas monitors feature more of what Gamers want the canvas 1440p QHD offers 165 Hertz refresh rate for the perfect balance between performance and resolution while the 1080p full HD canvas delivers 240 hertz for a Competitive Edge both versions feature AMD freesync Premium One millisecond response time and OSD settings via cam allowing for specific settings between games to see the complete list of canvas monitors and monitor mounts from NZXT follow the link in the description below uh so some fun exciting things to kind of talk about here it's important to note also too this is rumors um at least at the time making this video we have not been briefed on anything so everything I'm talking about is just kind of like what the sort of making the rounds and the closer we get to these launches the more accurate they tend to be so let's go and start off with the fact that we know it's our dna3 we know that it's 7000 series is what they're going to call it and the initial rumor let's just talk about performance because that's what everyone cares about right then we'll talk about efficiency we'll talk about Core Design availability potential pricing all that sort of stuff so two times faster in rasterization performance that doesn't seem all that surprising if we look at the history of the performance of our DNA so what we did was we've we've been testing these graphics cards since they first launched right all the way back to 5700 XT so what we did was we took a 5700 XT remember there was no 5800 or 5900 it was 5700 XT their first um I mean they kind of got away from Vega and all that and and Brady on seven they went back to a more traditional design and they launched with more mid-range cards kind of like Intel launched their mid-range cards first and so we compared the 5700 XT which was the highest rdna one offering compared to a 6950 XT which is their latest and greatest biggest die they've made you know to date and we took that 2x claim to see how that holds up I feel like the 5700 XT it's approximately 40 percent of the performance of a 6950 XT if we did that 6950 XT performance figure and double it and this is just time spy by the way which scales very well to core design it doesn't mean that the scaling in games will be the same there's too many other factors there in terms of like what type of Shadow technology are they using what type of anti-aliasing are they using is there any sort of upscaling are they taking name to leverage up any of the RT cores or tensor cores on Nvidia or you know there's too much other stuff happening but time spy extreme is just a rasterization dx12 test that does nothing but just scale perfectly with core speed so that's why we use that but it doesn't tell the whole story keep that in mind but 2x performance would put us at right around 21 130 which puts us about 1500 or so points ahead now about 1600 points ahead of the current 40 90. available by you know the Fe card which is a custom card by the way in rasterization performance now the claim is 2X rasterization and I wanted to know like does that even seem realistic or feasible well yes because we've gotten a minimum of 2x from 5000 series to 6000 series and now 6000 series top dog to 7000 series based on that potential number and where 30 series is or assuming the 40 90 is and the uplift we saw 490 versus 3090 it seems very realistic that in rasterization performance AMD might actually Edge out Nvidia remember to see where we're going we have to look at where we've been right that's that it's just the way Trends work so that's exciting to see something else we're talking about here is the fact that AMD is very very aware of the uplift in power necessary for Ada lovelace's performance figures to be are what they are in fact amd's also very aware of the amount of power draw that's taking place through the 12 volt high power connector and they made an official statement since we did our video about the melted cable saying that they will not be using that plug which is actually great news because early rumors said that they were going to be using that plug maybe they were planning on it maybe because of ATX 3.0 forward compatibility which by the way those power supplies will have standard power cables as well as the 12 pin uh excuse me 16 pin people like to count the four pin Side Band as a as pins but anyway I digress uh maybe this is one of those things where the benefit of not going first is you get to kind of see what the competition struggles with and then you can pivot and make some changes and and look better at the end of the day because of the fact that you're not gonna make the same mistakes that your competition is because you're letting them make them so we now know that AMD has officially stated they will not be using the new 12 16 pin connector at all which is good news although it may not have mattered because if we look at efficiency if we look at this chart that was put out here in terms of specs and such and these are preliminary specs so all of these are subject to change but we are looking at a 12 288 core design on a chiplet design by the way so the architecture part of this is going to be very similar to how they developed ryzen where it's scalable based on chiplets and there is going to be an Infinity fabric on the GPU as well and it's going to operate very similarly to how the ryzen architecture does only very very fast versus Verizon in terms of just its graphics performance so moving from a 6950 XT or 6900 XT or the XTX whatever you want to call it went from 5120 cores to 12 288 so now seeing that 2x performance and rasterization uplift seems very reasonable because there's more than 2x as many cores so now we're to talk about power efficiency because that is where a lot of people are going to be showing a lot of concern preliminarily it shows 350 Watts that is 100 Watts below the the the spec of an RTX 4090 that's 100 Watts lower than the um lifted spec of a 3090 TI remember 39 TI landed anywhere between 400 to 450 Watts depending if you move power sliders and such but the 39 TI was also fairly locked down versus Power sliders compared to 3090 and a 3080 inside they're also claiming two times performance in Ray tracing which by the way puts it a little bit about 20 ahead of an ampere architecture RT core or the second gen RT cores found in ampere like 30 90 30 90 TI and all that but not as fast as Ada Lovelace if we just use that math so you got to ask yourself how much you care about Ray tracing performance to say hey I want to I want a 7000 series card um if you are still in the bandwagon of saying I don't care about Ray tracing performance which is kind of getting harder to say these days because so many titles are now utilizing the RT cores and Ray tracing in some capacity within the art the game's engine this looks amazing because they promised or at least they're they're touting a 50 performance per watt uplift so that means for the same watt the same watt you'd get 50 more performance out of that same power draw a lot of people sometimes misread that to say it's 50 more efficient which technically you could say yes but that doesn't mean they didn't up the wattage which if we can see right here if this is true they upped it by 20 watts total board power which is kind of like negligible at this point given the the expansion of the uh the card specs itself because we also were seeing from 16 gigabytes up to 24 gigabytes on the 7900 XT which is which is kind of nice because that's one of the things people that were doing any sort of heavy intensive Graphics memory workload whether you're using the graphics card to do any sort of 3D rendering or um blender type work higher vram is King when it comes to that sort of workload if you're even using your card to do any sort of like AI training and stuff vram is King memory speed is showing a preliminary 20 Gigabytes per second whereas the 6900 XT was 16 to 18 gigabytes per sec or gigabits per second so gddr6 the usual stuff um in terms of the die size it's actually smaller the die itself is smaller compared to 6900 XT but remember the 600 XT has a single die at 520 millimeters squared the chiplets found on 7000 series are looking to be about 308 millimeters per squared however that's per chiplet and it's 533 millimeters squared with mcds so it depends on the sizing and remember the way that they're going to scale up these graphics cards if they do the same way as ryzen is going to be how many of those uh mcds are actually going to be in there so what we're seeing here is the design on 7000 series or Navi 31 for the 1700 XT being apparently uh one gcd plus six mcds so again scalable which is kind of nice to see but my concern there in terms of early adopter is going to be how are games going to leverage this new architecture design promise you right now when the card launches or at least when we are in our early testing phase and as as content creators I can guarantee you Andy's dealing with this right now they probably got a lot of basic boards in the hands of game developers and Studios to say here's how our architecture works you can start kind of planning for it there's going to be day one bugs there's going to be games that maybe won't launch there's gonna be games that might crash there's me games that probably will have severe instability or fluctuations or issues because it's going to take time for this completely different core design that we've never seen before become fully adopted so that's the downside if you're gonna move into uh adopting amd's rdna3 Tech on day one it will work itself out just like it did with ryzen but be aware when when you make a major design change like this it's gonna take time now one of the ways that they're achieving this level of power efficiency and again this is via AMD um and you can find this quote also on wccf Tech's website we'll put a link down below he says look in your head we're continuing our push for more efficient gaming with AMD Rd and A3 architecture that's the first Graphics architecture leveraged five nanometer process and the chip of packaging design is the 50 better performance per watt than rdna 2. it's top of the line gaming performance and a cool Quiet Energy Efficiency design says contributing to this energy conscious design rdna3 redefines uh the AMD R DNA 2 adaptive power management technology to set workload specific operating points ensuring each component of the GPU uses only the power it requires for Optimal Performance the new architecture also includes the new generation of AMD Infinity cash projected to offer an even higher density lower power caches to reduce the power needs of Graphics memory helping to see net aimed AMD rdna3 and Radeon graphics has a true leaders inefficiency it's funny because one of the things I noticed when I'm overclocking 4090 is if I'm monitoring power upping the core clock makes the power go up but if I up the memory clock it shoots up really high it sounds like this is one of the ways that they're able to achieve that basically what they say here is kind of eye-opening this is why there has to be some power lift I know a lot of people are like why is the power have to go up at all why did Nvidia go up as high as it did well he says it's really the fundamentals of physics that are driving this and this is nafsiger he says the demand for gaming and compute performance is if anything just accelerating and at the same time the underlying process technology is slowing down pretty dramatically and the Improvement at uh and the Improvement rate so power levels are just going to keep going up and now we've got a multi-year roadmap of very significant efficiency improved to offset that curve but the trend is there he's saying the architecture is not moving as fast as the demand for performances therefore by default you need more power to get more performance out of it so it's kind of like the Moore's Law thing a lot of people say Moore's Law is dead he says performance is King but even if our designs are more power efficient that doesn't mean you don't push the powers of power levels up if the competition is doing the same thing it's just that they're gonna have to push them a lot higher than we will so not only were they going after Nvidia specifically regarding performance because you have to match the performance you have to try at least but if they're able to even get anywhere close or match a performance of 40 series at 350 Watts then AMD absolutely when they sat right here in this studio and told us back in 2019 the rdna will be aging like fine wine just as ryzen did we have a lot to look forward to the only negative versus Nvidia that I can come up with here is that the RT performance if that truly matters to you is not going to match 4090s capability because 490 saw a 2X uplift over 30 series on RT performance and we verified that and so did everyone else that seemed like such an astronomical uplift but it's true 2x RT performance over rdna 2 only puts it a little ahead of 30 series however 30 series RT performance is not bad it's just it really comes down to price at this point because if this graphics card let's say the 7900 XT ends up costing a thousand dollars so very expensive graphics card 600 cheaper than a 40 90 if possible I'm concerned about this chiplet design might be expensive to produce the price is what's going to matter now at this point to get a lot of people adopting but the positives here not using the stupid 12 volt power connector scalable makes it easy I think for them to bust out designs and get them out sooner without having to actually have a die cut it's just how many of those gcds mcds are on the substrate faster memory more of it uplift of 2x performance and rasterization and 2x performance in RT and if you can make it cheaper it's already more efficient this is this is this is awesome anyway guys that's the rumor Roundup we're gonna be in Vegas next week I always say keep your ear to the ground because we're we're ready hopefully you are too all right guys thanks for watching sound off down below if uh 7000 series is even on your radar I think there's a lot of people right now that are just absolutely rooting for AMD for multitude of reasons all right guys thanks for watching and as always we'll see you in the next oneokay it's our DNA rumor Roundup time uh it's no surprise or no secret that uh amd's hosting an event in Las Vegas uh at the beginning of November and I give you guys basically three guesses that you but you only need one as to what it's going to be about ndxc canvas monitors feature more of what Gamers want the canvas 1440p QHD offers 165 Hertz refresh rate for the perfect balance between performance and resolution while the 1080p full HD canvas delivers 240 hertz for a Competitive Edge both versions feature AMD freesync Premium One millisecond response time and OSD settings via cam allowing for specific settings between games to see the complete list of canvas monitors and monitor mounts from NZXT follow the link in the description below uh so some fun exciting things to kind of talk about here it's important to note also too this is rumors um at least at the time making this video we have not been briefed on anything so everything I'm talking about is just kind of like what the sort of making the rounds and the closer we get to these launches the more accurate they tend to be so let's go and start off with the fact that we know it's our dna3 we know that it's 7000 series is what they're going to call it and the initial rumor let's just talk about performance because that's what everyone cares about right then we'll talk about efficiency we'll talk about Core Design availability potential pricing all that sort of stuff so two times faster in rasterization performance that doesn't seem all that surprising if we look at the history of the performance of our DNA so what we did was we've we've been testing these graphics cards since they first launched right all the way back to 5700 XT so what we did was we took a 5700 XT remember there was no 5800 or 5900 it was 5700 XT their first um I mean they kind of got away from Vega and all that and and Brady on seven they went back to a more traditional design and they launched with more mid-range cards kind of like Intel launched their mid-range cards first and so we compared the 5700 XT which was the highest rdna one offering compared to a 6950 XT which is their latest and greatest biggest die they've made you know to date and we took that 2x claim to see how that holds up I feel like the 5700 XT it's approximately 40 percent of the performance of a 6950 XT if we did that 6950 XT performance figure and double it and this is just time spy by the way which scales very well to core design it doesn't mean that the scaling in games will be the same there's too many other factors there in terms of like what type of Shadow technology are they using what type of anti-aliasing are they using is there any sort of upscaling are they taking name to leverage up any of the RT cores or tensor cores on Nvidia or you know there's too much other stuff happening but time spy extreme is just a rasterization dx12 test that does nothing but just scale perfectly with core speed so that's why we use that but it doesn't tell the whole story keep that in mind but 2x performance would put us at right around 21 130 which puts us about 1500 or so points ahead now about 1600 points ahead of the current 40 90. available by you know the Fe card which is a custom card by the way in rasterization performance now the claim is 2X rasterization and I wanted to know like does that even seem realistic or feasible well yes because we've gotten a minimum of 2x from 5000 series to 6000 series and now 6000 series top dog to 7000 series based on that potential number and where 30 series is or assuming the 40 90 is and the uplift we saw 490 versus 3090 it seems very realistic that in rasterization performance AMD might actually Edge out Nvidia remember to see where we're going we have to look at where we've been right that's that it's just the way Trends work so that's exciting to see something else we're talking about here is the fact that AMD is very very aware of the uplift in power necessary for Ada lovelace's performance figures to be are what they are in fact amd's also very aware of the amount of power draw that's taking place through the 12 volt high power connector and they made an official statement since we did our video about the melted cable saying that they will not be using that plug which is actually great news because early rumors said that they were going to be using that plug maybe they were planning on it maybe because of ATX 3.0 forward compatibility which by the way those power supplies will have standard power cables as well as the 12 pin uh excuse me 16 pin people like to count the four pin Side Band as a as pins but anyway I digress uh maybe this is one of those things where the benefit of not going first is you get to kind of see what the competition struggles with and then you can pivot and make some changes and and look better at the end of the day because of the fact that you're not gonna make the same mistakes that your competition is because you're letting them make them so we now know that AMD has officially stated they will not be using the new 12 16 pin connector at all which is good news although it may not have mattered because if we look at efficiency if we look at this chart that was put out here in terms of specs and such and these are preliminary specs so all of these are subject to change but we are looking at a 12 288 core design on a chiplet design by the way so the architecture part of this is going to be very similar to how they developed ryzen where it's scalable based on chiplets and there is going to be an Infinity fabric on the GPU as well and it's going to operate very similarly to how the ryzen architecture does only very very fast versus Verizon in terms of just its graphics performance so moving from a 6950 XT or 6900 XT or the XTX whatever you want to call it went from 5120 cores to 12 288 so now seeing that 2x performance and rasterization uplift seems very reasonable because there's more than 2x as many cores so now we're to talk about power efficiency because that is where a lot of people are going to be showing a lot of concern preliminarily it shows 350 Watts that is 100 Watts below the the the spec of an RTX 4090 that's 100 Watts lower than the um lifted spec of a 3090 TI remember 39 TI landed anywhere between 400 to 450 Watts depending if you move power sliders and such but the 39 TI was also fairly locked down versus Power sliders compared to 3090 and a 3080 inside they're also claiming two times performance in Ray tracing which by the way puts it a little bit about 20 ahead of an ampere architecture RT core or the second gen RT cores found in ampere like 30 90 30 90 TI and all that but not as fast as Ada Lovelace if we just use that math so you got to ask yourself how much you care about Ray tracing performance to say hey I want to I want a 7000 series card um if you are still in the bandwagon of saying I don't care about Ray tracing performance which is kind of getting harder to say these days because so many titles are now utilizing the RT cores and Ray tracing in some capacity within the art the game's engine this looks amazing because they promised or at least they're they're touting a 50 performance per watt uplift so that means for the same watt the same watt you'd get 50 more performance out of that same power draw a lot of people sometimes misread that to say it's 50 more efficient which technically you could say yes but that doesn't mean they didn't up the wattage which if we can see right here if this is true they upped it by 20 watts total board power which is kind of like negligible at this point given the the expansion of the uh the card specs itself because we also were seeing from 16 gigabytes up to 24 gigabytes on the 7900 XT which is which is kind of nice because that's one of the things people that were doing any sort of heavy intensive Graphics memory workload whether you're using the graphics card to do any sort of 3D rendering or um blender type work higher vram is King when it comes to that sort of workload if you're even using your card to do any sort of like AI training and stuff vram is King memory speed is showing a preliminary 20 Gigabytes per second whereas the 6900 XT was 16 to 18 gigabytes per sec or gigabits per second so gddr6 the usual stuff um in terms of the die size it's actually smaller the die itself is smaller compared to 6900 XT but remember the 600 XT has a single die at 520 millimeters squared the chiplets found on 7000 series are looking to be about 308 millimeters per squared however that's per chiplet and it's 533 millimeters squared with mcds so it depends on the sizing and remember the way that they're going to scale up these graphics cards if they do the same way as ryzen is going to be how many of those uh mcds are actually going to be in there so what we're seeing here is the design on 7000 series or Navi 31 for the 1700 XT being apparently uh one gcd plus six mcds so again scalable which is kind of nice to see but my concern there in terms of early adopter is going to be how are games going to leverage this new architecture design promise you right now when the card launches or at least when we are in our early testing phase and as as content creators I can guarantee you Andy's dealing with this right now they probably got a lot of basic boards in the hands of game developers and Studios to say here's how our architecture works you can start kind of planning for it there's going to be day one bugs there's going to be games that maybe won't launch there's gonna be games that might crash there's me games that probably will have severe instability or fluctuations or issues because it's going to take time for this completely different core design that we've never seen before become fully adopted so that's the downside if you're gonna move into uh adopting amd's rdna3 Tech on day one it will work itself out just like it did with ryzen but be aware when when you make a major design change like this it's gonna take time now one of the ways that they're achieving this level of power efficiency and again this is via AMD um and you can find this quote also on wccf Tech's website we'll put a link down below he says look in your head we're continuing our push for more efficient gaming with AMD Rd and A3 architecture that's the first Graphics architecture leveraged five nanometer process and the chip of packaging design is the 50 better performance per watt than rdna 2. it's top of the line gaming performance and a cool Quiet Energy Efficiency design says contributing to this energy conscious design rdna3 redefines uh the AMD R DNA 2 adaptive power management technology to set workload specific operating points ensuring each component of the GPU uses only the power it requires for Optimal Performance the new architecture also includes the new generation of AMD Infinity cash projected to offer an even higher density lower power caches to reduce the power needs of Graphics memory helping to see net aimed AMD rdna3 and Radeon graphics has a true leaders inefficiency it's funny because one of the things I noticed when I'm overclocking 4090 is if I'm monitoring power upping the core clock makes the power go up but if I up the memory clock it shoots up really high it sounds like this is one of the ways that they're able to achieve that basically what they say here is kind of eye-opening this is why there has to be some power lift I know a lot of people are like why is the power have to go up at all why did Nvidia go up as high as it did well he says it's really the fundamentals of physics that are driving this and this is nafsiger he says the demand for gaming and compute performance is if anything just accelerating and at the same time the underlying process technology is slowing down pretty dramatically and the Improvement at uh and the Improvement rate so power levels are just going to keep going up and now we've got a multi-year roadmap of very significant efficiency improved to offset that curve but the trend is there he's saying the architecture is not moving as fast as the demand for performances therefore by default you need more power to get more performance out of it so it's kind of like the Moore's Law thing a lot of people say Moore's Law is dead he says performance is King but even if our designs are more power efficient that doesn't mean you don't push the powers of power levels up if the competition is doing the same thing it's just that they're gonna have to push them a lot higher than we will so not only were they going after Nvidia specifically regarding performance because you have to match the performance you have to try at least but if they're able to even get anywhere close or match a performance of 40 series at 350 Watts then AMD absolutely when they sat right here in this studio and told us back in 2019 the rdna will be aging like fine wine just as ryzen did we have a lot to look forward to the only negative versus Nvidia that I can come up with here is that the RT performance if that truly matters to you is not going to match 4090s capability because 490 saw a 2X uplift over 30 series on RT performance and we verified that and so did everyone else that seemed like such an astronomical uplift but it's true 2x RT performance over rdna 2 only puts it a little ahead of 30 series however 30 series RT performance is not bad it's just it really comes down to price at this point because if this graphics card let's say the 7900 XT ends up costing a thousand dollars so very expensive graphics card 600 cheaper than a 40 90 if possible I'm concerned about this chiplet design might be expensive to produce the price is what's going to matter now at this point to get a lot of people adopting but the positives here not using the stupid 12 volt power connector scalable makes it easy I think for them to bust out designs and get them out sooner without having to actually have a die cut it's just how many of those gcds mcds are on the substrate faster memory more of it uplift of 2x performance and rasterization and 2x performance in RT and if you can make it cheaper it's already more efficient this is this is this is awesome anyway guys that's the rumor Roundup we're gonna be in Vegas next week I always say keep your ear to the ground because we're we're ready hopefully you are too all right guys thanks for watching sound off down below if uh 7000 series is even on your radar I think there's a lot of people right now that are just absolutely rooting for AMD for multitude of reasons all right guys thanks for watching and as always we'll see you in the next one\n"