**Mini PC Performance Test: Jupiter X300 and ASRock Desk Mini**
The pursuit of mini PCs has led to the development of powerful and efficient compact systems that can deliver impressive performance at an affordable price. In this article, we'll be testing two popular mini PC options: the ASRock Jupiter X300 and the ASRock Desk Mini. Both models have been designed with performance in mind, but how do they stack up against each other?
We began our testing by running CS:GO on the Jupiter X300 at 1080p low settings with a resolution scale of 100. We were pleased to find that we could average around 63 frames per second (fps), which is quite respectable for a mini PC. To put this into perspective, dropping the resolution down or even just reducing the scale at 1080 would allow us to squeeze out more performance from the system. However, we chose to keep the settings as is to see what kind of performance we could expect.
In contrast, our test results were less impressive for Dirt 5, which struggled to reach an average of 52 fps at 720p low settings. This highlights the importance of choosing the right game and settings when testing mini PC performance. Moving on to Marvel vs. Capcom Infinite, we found that the system was able to maintain a steady 60 fps at 1080p low medium mix settings.
Forza Horizon 4 also performed well, with an average of 64 fps at 1080p low medium mix settings. This is impressive, especially when considering the game's demanding graphics requirements. The system also handled Forza Horizon 4 relatively well in terms of power consumption, with a total system power draw of around 71 watts.
In contrast, Doom Eternal was less successful, struggling to reach an average of 51 fps at 1600x900 low settings without resolution scaling enabled. This is likely due to the game's demanding graphics requirements and the system's limited cooling capabilities. To mitigate this, we had to drop the setting down to 720p low to achieve a steady 60 fps.
Finally, our test results for Cyberpunk 2077 were underwhelming, with an average of just 33 fps at 720p low settings without resolution scaling enabled. This is not surprising, given the game's demanding graphics requirements and the system's relatively limited processing power.
**Power Consumption**
To get a better understanding of the mini PC's performance, we also tested its power consumption using a kilowatt meter. We plugged the system into the wall and monitored the power draw while it was under load with various games. The results were interesting, with the system consuming around 71 watts at 1080p low settings in GTA V.
However, during our extreme testing session, we found that the system's maximum power draw reached as high as 93 watts. This is impressive considering the system's relatively small size and low power supply. However, this also highlights the importance of choosing a suitable power supply for your mini PC build.
**CPU Temperatures**
We were pleased to find that the CPU temperatures during our testing session were relatively low, with idle temperatures ranging from 46°C to 73°C under load. This is impressive considering the system's compact size and limited cooling capabilities.
However, when we pushed the system to its extreme test limits, we found that the CPU temperatures spiked to around 92°C. This may not be a significant concern for most users, but it does highlight the importance of choosing a suitable cooler for your mini PC build.
**Form Factor and Cooling**
Both the ASRock Jupiter X300 and the ASRock Desk Mini feature compact form factors that make them ideal for small spaces. However, the Jupiter X300 has a slightly larger footprint than the Desk Mini, which may be a consideration for users with limited space.
In terms of cooling, both systems rely on passive cooling solutions to keep temperatures in check. The Jupiter X300 features a heat sink and fan system that is effective at maintaining stable temperatures during testing. However, the ASRock Desk Mini also performed well in this regard, thanks to its own compact heat sink design.
**Conclusion**
The ASRock Jupiter X300 and the ASRock Desk Mini are both powerful and efficient mini PCs that deliver impressive performance at an affordable price. While they share many similarities, there are some key differences between the two models that may make one more suitable for your needs than the other.
In our testing session, we found that the Jupiter X300 performed well in terms of CPU performance, with strong results from games like CS:GO and Forza Horizon 4. However, it struggled with games like Dirt 5 and Doom Eternal, which highlighted the importance of choosing the right game and settings for your mini PC build.
On the other hand, the ASRock Desk Mini performed well in terms of power consumption, with a relatively low power draw compared to its competitors. However, it may not be as powerful as the Jupiter X300 in terms of raw CPU performance.
Ultimately, both systems are great options for users looking for compact and efficient mini PCs that deliver impressive performance at an affordable price.