Google's Project Tango: A Brief History and Its Impact on Smartphones
Project Tango was an initiative by Google that aimed to enable smartphones to detect their exact position relative to the world around them. The company partnered with various manufacturers to integrate specialized sensors into their devices, allowing them to provide precise location data. This technology had the potential to revolutionize the field of augmented reality (AR) and artificial intelligence (AI). However, the project ultimately failed to gain widespread adoption.
Google called Project Tango a "proof-of-concept" for AR technology, and it was intended to be used as a stepping stone towards more advanced AR capabilities. The company encouraged device manufacturers to adopt this technology by providing guidelines and certification programs for compatible devices. One of the few companies that actively pursued this initiative was Asus, which released the Zenfone Ar, one of the first phones to support Project Tango. Although the phone's design was sleek and feature-rich, it did not become a huge commercial success.
The failure of Project Tango can be attributed to Google's own realization that they could achieve similar results without the need for specialized sensors. The company subsequently developed AR Core, which became the standard for most modern smartphones. This shift in strategy left many Project Tango devices obsolete and limited their functionality. Despite this setback, Asus continued to innovate, releasing a follow-up model, the Zenfone 2, which featured improved self-healing capabilities.
The LG G Flex: A Revolutionary Design Philosophy
In 2013, LG released the G Flex, a smartphone that defied conventional design norms. The phone's curved shape was inspired by the natural curves of the human body, particularly the hands and face. This unorthodox approach to design aimed to provide a more comfortable user experience. The phone's back was made from a self-healing material called Healite, which had an atomic structure that could repair scratches and cracks.
The LG G Flex 2 took this technology a step further by refining the self-healing capabilities of its predecessor. The new device boasted improved scratch resistance and healing times, with some estimates suggesting it could recover in seconds. Although these innovations were promising, they ultimately failed to gain widespread adoption due to the rise of glass-based smartphone designs.
The LG G Flex 2: A Subtle yet Innovative Design
Compared to its predecessor, the LG G Flex 2 was a more subtle design iteration. While still maintaining the curved shape that set it apart from other smartphones, the new device seemed less pronounced and refined. The phone's size was also reduced, making it a more compact option for users.
In an attempt to showcase the self-healing capabilities of its material, LG included a scratch test in the packaging of the phone. When the device was subjected to a knife attack, the material appeared to repair itself, restoring its original appearance. However, this gimmick did not translate to widespread commercial success.
The Decline of Self-Healing Phones
Despite the potential benefits of self-healing materials, they never gained significant traction in the smartphone market. The primary reason for this was the widespread adoption of glass-based designs, which became the norm in the industry. Apple's early use of glass on its iPhones and Samsung's subsequent switch to this material type pressured other manufacturers to follow suit.
The rise of glass-based designs left self-healing phones with limited appeal, as they were no longer seen as a premium feature. LG, in particular, seemed to have reached a plateau with its innovations, failing to continue improving the technology beyond its initial potential. The decline of self-healing phones marked an interesting chapter in the evolution of smartphone design, highlighting the trade-offs between innovative materials and mainstream adoption.
Ideal Smartphone Finishes: A Subject of Personal Preference
When it comes to smartphone finishes, opinions are often subjective and varied. Some users prefer the premium feel of glass, while others appreciate the durability of metal or the eco-friendliness of plastic. Wood, a less common material used in smartphones, has gained popularity in recent years due to its unique aesthetic appeal.
The ideal smartphone finish ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. While some may value scratch resistance above all else, others might prioritize aesthetics or sustainability. As the smartphone market continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how manufacturers balance innovation with user expectations.