The Testing of Gaming Laptops: A Comparative Analysis

Rainbow Six Siege was tested with the built-in benchmark and is a game that I found a benefit from, invidious nurturing architecture like some of the other well-performing games. This one generally always does pretty good on modern hardware. PubG was tested using the replay feature, and in this game, I saw no major differences between the different setting levels in terms of average FPS. That was only around a difference of 5 between very low and ultra with inconsistent one-percenter low results.

Assassin's Creed Odyssey was tested with the built-in benchmark, and seems to be quite a CPU heavy test. So why for all results are a little down over the recent Intel laptops I've covered? Dota 2 was tested playing in the middle lane with an average amount of action going on, and it played well without any noticeable issues. 144 FPS averages were possible with low settings while Ultra was still above 90 FPS. Watchdogs 2 was a resource intensive game however, with the solid 30 FPS to me it plays fine so even with ultra settings, I have a hard time seeing the difference between ultra and very high.

Ghost Recon is another demanding game, and was tested using the built-in benchmark. Unless you've got a top-of-the-line thick laptop, 60 FPS at Ultra in this test is basically not possible though was achieved with very high settings here. The Witcher 3 was running well with some mods disabled even with ultra settings to me was playing perfectly fine with an average 70 FPS while still also looking great. Doom was tested using Vulcan and this game saw the first problem with the AMD and NVIDIA hybrid laptop by default. Vulcan games seemed to want to use the Vega 10 graphics instead of the GTX 16 60 Ti so I could only get Vulcan to work by disabling the Vega 10 graphics and device manager.

Strange Brigade was another game that was tested with Vulcan, but this one would era and not run unless I disabled the Vega 10 graphics on the AMD CPU through the device manager. After that it worked without issue with 90 FPS averages at Ultra possible in this test. Shadow of War was tested with the built-in benchmark, and is another game that I've found a benefit from, invidious nurturing architecture even ultra settings was able to average above 60 fps in this test so not too bad.

Comparing the Gaming Performance of Different Laptops

Let's take a look at how this config of the ASUS FX 505 D compares with other gaming laptops to see how it stacks up. Use these results as a rough guide only, as they were tested at different times with different drivers. Battlefield 5 has the FX 505 D at the top in red, and like I said before, it's performing quite well still above 60 FPS at Ultra while it doesn't look too good here comparatively.

Keep in mind that the newest 16 series graphics only just launched for laptops, so I don't yet have much of the data to compare with. Again, it's worth remembering that the Infinity s7 was tested with single channel memory despite this, and it's performing better presumably due to the high-tier 9750 H CPU.

More Results from Shadow of the Term Raider

These are the results from Shadow of the Term Raider with the built-in benchmark at highest settings, and well yeah again, it's in the last place but that's only because I've been sent higher SPECT machines lately. I know you guys want to see lower to mid-range options and I'm trying to get them unfortunately, I don't have too much say and just get what I'm given.

But there are more 16 50 and 16 60 TI laptops here to test so don't worry overall the gaming performance from this machine was quite good. This is the first time I've tested the 16 60 TI in a laptop with dual channel memory, so I don't yet have much other data to compare with but I'll build up more data over time so stay tuned.

Performance Comparison and Conclusion

Sure, the performance in many games here aren't quite as high when compared to many other laptops I've recently tested. But you've got a factor in that lately I've only been sent hiring models while I was skeptical of the AMD and NVIDIA hybrid overall it worked well and I admit better than I was expecting with the exception of my 2 Vulcan titles as previously discussed.

Though even without my workaround both games still ran fine without Vulcan so hopefully that bug gets fixed. I'll have comparisons between the horizon 737 50h and Intel CPUs once I get back from comp II ducts let me know what other comparisons you'd like to see with FX 505 D and let me know your thoughts on this strange AMD and NVIDIA hybrid gaming laptop down in the comments.

From what I've seen so far, it's performing pretty well make sure you're subscribed for the upcoming full review.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enthe newest su stuff FX fiber 5d you gaming laptop is a bit different it's got an AMD CPU with nvidia graphics but just how well does it perform in games in this testing I've been schmuck to 19 different games at all setting levels to show you how well it runs and compared it against some other gaming laptops to see how it stacks up just quickly before we jump into the benchmark results I'll cover off the specs in my unit I've got the D U model which means there's an AMD risin 730 750 H CPU and NVIDIA GTX 16 60 ti graphics an unusual combination I've also got 16 gig of dual channel memory though my unit did come with single channel out of the box but it looks like you can purchase it with either it's available with some different configurations you can see examples and check updated prices linked in the description I was running Windows 10 with the latest Nvidia drivers available and I've got turbo mode enabled for Best Performance however I didn't find this to overclock the 16 60 TI just as a reminder we're only looking at gaming performance here if you're new to the channel get subscribed for the upcoming full review which will cover everything we'll start off with the results from all 19 games at all setting levels then compare with some other gaming laptops afterwards to see how the FX 505 stacks up battlefield 5 was tested in campaign mode and not in multiplayer mode as it's easy to consistently reproduce the test run the results here seemed fair and it was definitely playable with ultra settings with above 60 FPS average as possible battlefield 1 was also tested in campaign mode and was performing very well with ultra settings getting us closer to 100 FPS now and while the one percent low was a little inconsistent it was still above 64 all settings apex legends was tested with either all settings at maximum or all settings at the lowest possible values as it doesn't have predefined setting presets it played fine even with everything at maximum though dropping down to minimum boosted FPS by 41% farcry new dawn was tested with the built-in benchmark in this test 55 FPS averages were hit at ultra settings honestly not all that far behind some high aspect options fortnight was tested with the replay feature and this game runs well on pretty much anything at Ultra settings it was still possible to reach above 100 FPS in this test with decent 1% lows with higher still possible at lower settings or ever watch is another well optimized game and was tested in the practice range as other players BOTS and even different maps in actual gameplay affect the framerate and this allows for consistent testing again even at epic settings average FPS is great for the 120 Hertz panel with above 100 for the 1% lower shadow of the Tomb Raider was tested with the built-in benchmark I don't have too much 1660 TI laptop dot e yet but even the Infinity s7 I recently tested which was hampered with single channel memory was a little ahead here showing that the more powerful I 790 750 H is going to make a difference in many titles I'll be doing many different cpu comparisons with the horizon 7:30 750 H though so make sure you subscribe for those metro Exodus was tested using the built-in benchmark most parts of the game perform a fair bit better than this so don't take these results as a good indication of what to expect throughout the entire game it's more of a worst case but does let you perform the same test to compare against csgo was tested using the Aletta chol FPS benchmark and like always high frame rates were coming out of this test however the results were noticeably lower when compared against the Intel based laptops I usually test though it seems to be well learned that this game favours Intel CPUs so if csgo is your focus this may not be the best for you Rainbow six siege was tested with the built-in benchmark and is a game I found a benefit from invidious nuturing architecture like some of the other well performing games this one generally always does pretty good on modern hardware pub G was tested using the replay feature and in this game I saw no major differences between the different setting levels in terms of average FPS that was only around a difference of 5 between very low and ultra with inconsistent one-percenter low results Assassin's Creed Odyssey was tested with the built-in benchmark and seems to be quite a CPU heavy test so why for all results are a little down over the recent Intel laptops I've covered dota 2 was tested playing in the middle lane with an average amount of action going on and it played well without any noticeable issues 144 FPS averages were possible with low settings while Ultra was still above 90 watchdogs 2 was a resource intensive game however with the solid 30 FPS to me it plays fine so even with ultra settings with our 31 1% lower nor trouble playing there personally I have a hard time seeing the difference between ultra and very high anyway Ghost Recon is another demanding game and was tested using the built-in benchmark unless you've got a top-of-the-line thick laptop 60 FPS at Ultra in this test is basically not possible though was achieved with very high settings here The Witcher 3 was running well with her works disabled even with ultra settings to me was playing perfectly fine with an average 70 FPS while still also looking great doom was tested using Vulcan and this game saw the first problem with the AMD and NVIDIA hybrid laptop by default Vulcan games seemed to want to use the Vega 10 graphics instead of the GTX 16 60 Ti so I could only get Vulcan to work by disabling the Vega 10 graphics and device manager anyway once I got it working were able to hit around 100 FPS at Ultra settings it was running very well strange Brigade was another game that was tested with Vulcan and like derm this one would era and not run unless I disabled the Vega 10 graphics on the AMD CPU through the device manager after that it worked without issue with 90 FPS averages at Ultra possible in this test shadow of war was tested with the built-in benchmark and is another game that I've found a benefit from invidious nuturing architecture even ultra settings was able to average above 60 fps in this test so not too bad let's also take a look at how this config of the asou stuff FX 505 D you compares with other gaming laptops to see how it stacks up use these results as a rough guide only as they were tested at different times with different drivers in battlefield 5 I've got the FX 505 D you up the top in red and like I said before it's performing quite well still above 60 fps at Ultra while it doesn't look too good here comparatively keep in mind the newest 16 series graphics only just launched for laptops so I don't yet have that much of the data to compare with again it's worth remembering the Infinity s7 was tested with single channel memory despite this it's performing better presumably due to the high tier 9750 H CPU these are the results from shadow of the term Raider with the built-in benchmark at highest settings and well yeah again it's in the last place but that's only because I've been sent higher SPECT machines lately I know you guys want to see lower to mid range options and I'm trying to get them unfortunately I don't have too much say and just get what I'm given but there are more 16 50 and 16 60 TI laptops here to test so don't worry overall the gaming performance from this machine was quite good this is the first time I've tested the 16 60 TI in a laptop with dual channel memory so I don't yet have much other daughter to compare with but I'll build up more data over time so stay tuned sure the performance in many games here aren't quite as high when compared to many other laptops I've recently tested but you've got a factor in that lately I've only been sent hiring models while I was skeptical of the AMD and NVIDIA hybrid overall it worked well and I admit better than I was expecting with the exception of my 2 Vulcan titles as previously discussed though even without my workaround both games still ran fine without Vulcan so hopefully that bug gets fixed I'll have comparisons between the horizon 737 50h and Intel CPUs once I get back from comp II ducts let me know what other comparisons you'd like to see with FX 505 D you and let me know your thoughts on this strange AMD and NVIDIA hybrid gaming laptop down in the comments from what I've seen so far it's performing pretty well make sure you're subscribed for the upcoming full reviewthe newest su stuff FX fiber 5d you gaming laptop is a bit different it's got an AMD CPU with nvidia graphics but just how well does it perform in games in this testing I've been schmuck to 19 different games at all setting levels to show you how well it runs and compared it against some other gaming laptops to see how it stacks up just quickly before we jump into the benchmark results I'll cover off the specs in my unit I've got the D U model which means there's an AMD risin 730 750 H CPU and NVIDIA GTX 16 60 ti graphics an unusual combination I've also got 16 gig of dual channel memory though my unit did come with single channel out of the box but it looks like you can purchase it with either it's available with some different configurations you can see examples and check updated prices linked in the description I was running Windows 10 with the latest Nvidia drivers available and I've got turbo mode enabled for Best Performance however I didn't find this to overclock the 16 60 TI just as a reminder we're only looking at gaming performance here if you're new to the channel get subscribed for the upcoming full review which will cover everything we'll start off with the results from all 19 games at all setting levels then compare with some other gaming laptops afterwards to see how the FX 505 stacks up battlefield 5 was tested in campaign mode and not in multiplayer mode as it's easy to consistently reproduce the test run the results here seemed fair and it was definitely playable with ultra settings with above 60 FPS average as possible battlefield 1 was also tested in campaign mode and was performing very well with ultra settings getting us closer to 100 FPS now and while the one percent low was a little inconsistent it was still above 64 all settings apex legends was tested with either all settings at maximum or all settings at the lowest possible values as it doesn't have predefined setting presets it played fine even with everything at maximum though dropping down to minimum boosted FPS by 41% farcry new dawn was tested with the built-in benchmark in this test 55 FPS averages were hit at ultra settings honestly not all that far behind some high aspect options fortnight was tested with the replay feature and this game runs well on pretty much anything at Ultra settings it was still possible to reach above 100 FPS in this test with decent 1% lows with higher still possible at lower settings or ever watch is another well optimized game and was tested in the practice range as other players BOTS and even different maps in actual gameplay affect the framerate and this allows for consistent testing again even at epic settings average FPS is great for the 120 Hertz panel with above 100 for the 1% lower shadow of the Tomb Raider was tested with the built-in benchmark I don't have too much 1660 TI laptop dot e yet but even the Infinity s7 I recently tested which was hampered with single channel memory was a little ahead here showing that the more powerful I 790 750 H is going to make a difference in many titles I'll be doing many different cpu comparisons with the horizon 7:30 750 H though so make sure you subscribe for those metro Exodus was tested using the built-in benchmark most parts of the game perform a fair bit better than this so don't take these results as a good indication of what to expect throughout the entire game it's more of a worst case but does let you perform the same test to compare against csgo was tested using the Aletta chol FPS benchmark and like always high frame rates were coming out of this test however the results were noticeably lower when compared against the Intel based laptops I usually test though it seems to be well learned that this game favours Intel CPUs so if csgo is your focus this may not be the best for you Rainbow six siege was tested with the built-in benchmark and is a game I found a benefit from invidious nuturing architecture like some of the other well performing games this one generally always does pretty good on modern hardware pub G was tested using the replay feature and in this game I saw no major differences between the different setting levels in terms of average FPS that was only around a difference of 5 between very low and ultra with inconsistent one-percenter low results Assassin's Creed Odyssey was tested with the built-in benchmark and seems to be quite a CPU heavy test so why for all results are a little down over the recent Intel laptops I've covered dota 2 was tested playing in the middle lane with an average amount of action going on and it played well without any noticeable issues 144 FPS averages were possible with low settings while Ultra was still above 90 watchdogs 2 was a resource intensive game however with the solid 30 FPS to me it plays fine so even with ultra settings with our 31 1% lower nor trouble playing there personally I have a hard time seeing the difference between ultra and very high anyway Ghost Recon is another demanding game and was tested using the built-in benchmark unless you've got a top-of-the-line thick laptop 60 FPS at Ultra in this test is basically not possible though was achieved with very high settings here The Witcher 3 was running well with her works disabled even with ultra settings to me was playing perfectly fine with an average 70 FPS while still also looking great doom was tested using Vulcan and this game saw the first problem with the AMD and NVIDIA hybrid laptop by default Vulcan games seemed to want to use the Vega 10 graphics instead of the GTX 16 60 Ti so I could only get Vulcan to work by disabling the Vega 10 graphics and device manager anyway once I got it working were able to hit around 100 FPS at Ultra settings it was running very well strange Brigade was another game that was tested with Vulcan and like derm this one would era and not run unless I disabled the Vega 10 graphics on the AMD CPU through the device manager after that it worked without issue with 90 FPS averages at Ultra possible in this test shadow of war was tested with the built-in benchmark and is another game that I've found a benefit from invidious nuturing architecture even ultra settings was able to average above 60 fps in this test so not too bad let's also take a look at how this config of the asou stuff FX 505 D you compares with other gaming laptops to see how it stacks up use these results as a rough guide only as they were tested at different times with different drivers in battlefield 5 I've got the FX 505 D you up the top in red and like I said before it's performing quite well still above 60 fps at Ultra while it doesn't look too good here comparatively keep in mind the newest 16 series graphics only just launched for laptops so I don't yet have that much of the data to compare with again it's worth remembering the Infinity s7 was tested with single channel memory despite this it's performing better presumably due to the high tier 9750 H CPU these are the results from shadow of the term Raider with the built-in benchmark at highest settings and well yeah again it's in the last place but that's only because I've been sent higher SPECT machines lately I know you guys want to see lower to mid range options and I'm trying to get them unfortunately I don't have too much say and just get what I'm given but there are more 16 50 and 16 60 TI laptops here to test so don't worry overall the gaming performance from this machine was quite good this is the first time I've tested the 16 60 TI in a laptop with dual channel memory so I don't yet have much other daughter to compare with but I'll build up more data over time so stay tuned sure the performance in many games here aren't quite as high when compared to many other laptops I've recently tested but you've got a factor in that lately I've only been sent hiring models while I was skeptical of the AMD and NVIDIA hybrid overall it worked well and I admit better than I was expecting with the exception of my 2 Vulcan titles as previously discussed though even without my workaround both games still ran fine without Vulcan so hopefully that bug gets fixed I'll have comparisons between the horizon 737 50h and Intel CPUs once I get back from comp II ducts let me know what other comparisons you'd like to see with FX 505 D you and let me know your thoughts on this strange AMD and NVIDIA hybrid gaming laptop down in the comments from what I've seen so far it's performing pretty well make sure you're subscribed for the upcoming full review\n"