**Open Back Headphones: A Comparative Analysis**

In our quest to evaluate the performance of open back headphones, we recently put two industry standard models through their paces. The first model, which we'll refer to as Model A, was found to have a measurable but minor variance between its own units and when tested by human subjects. This variance is considered acceptable within the realm of what we'd consider normal performance. However, this variation does highlight the importance of proper calibration and testing procedures in ensuring that headphones perform consistently.

When it comes to open back headphones, which rely on a good seal around the ear to recreate bass frequencies, variations can lead to significant differences in the listening experience. In our tests, we found that some people would perceive more than twice as much bass compared to others. This disparity stems from the fact that closed-back headphones require an accurate seal to accurately reproduce bass frequencies. Comparing our own heads to those of human test subjects revealed that while both were relatively close, one model performed slightly better. The Model A excelled in this aspect, impressing us with its ability to capture the nuances of bass frequencies.

**Closed Back Headphones: A Different Story**

On the other hand, when we switched to a popular closed-back headphone, the results were starkly different. Our tests revealed that the variance between human subjects at 40 Hz and 14 decibels was significant. This disparity highlights the importance of proper fit and seal in order to accurately reproduce sound frequencies. The model we tested here measured slightly closer to our human test subjects than another competing model, earning it a gold star in our book.

However, our tests also revealed that these headphones struggled to achieve an accurate seal when used with certain types of hats or headgear. This issue is not unique to these models and highlights the importance of ensuring proper fit and comfort for users. Unfortunately, this means that these headphones may not be the best choice for everyone, particularly those who wear hats regularly.

**In-Ear Headphones: A Complication**

We also tested some in-ear headphones known for their compatibility issues with hats. To our surprise, both models struggled to achieve a good seal when used with certain headgear. This issue is not limited to these specific models and highlights the importance of considering factors like hat-wearing habits and earbud design when selecting headphones.

**The BNK 5128: A Winner**

After conducting thorough testing, we found that the BNK 5128 emerged as a clear winner in our evaluation. While some may argue that using an older simulator might not be the best approach due to advancements in technology, we believe that adapting current knowledge to newer models can yield the best results. The BNK 5128 impressed us with its ease of use, durability, and reputation.

**A Note on Our Testing Protocols**

It's worth noting that our tests were by no means perfect. We recognize that there is always room for improvement, and we're committed to pushing the boundaries of what's possible in audio testing. Our lab is still under construction, and achieving industry-leading testing standards will take time.

**The Future of Audio Testing**

In addition to evaluating headphones, we have a range of other tests planned for the future, including microphone testing, noise-cancelling evaluation, and even attempts to apply response curve data to human perception. We're excited to share these developments with our audience and look forward to your feedback and suggestions.

**Enlisted: A Free-to-Play World War II Multiplayer Shooter**

In a break from audio testing, we'd like to invite you to try out Enlisted, a free-to-play world war II multiplayer shooter available on PC, PS5, PS4, Xbox Series X and S, and Xbox One. With cross-platform play, hundreds of historical firearms and specialized weapons, and even building construction and destructible items in the environment, Enlisted promises an immersive gaming experience.

By signing up through our link, you'll receive a free bonus, including three days of premium time and several orders for troops and equipment. Head to the link in the description to start playing today.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enwe've already made some big investments into our testing lab a new building new talent and some crazy new equipment and we are finally ready to start talking about it see these two heads they're called hats or head and torso simulators they're for testing personal audio products and the ones in front of me cost a combined 80 000 us dollars which is why we definitely cannot afford to keep both of them what lies no please i'll do anything anything uh crucial's ddr5 ram is engineered to load transfer and download files faster with less lag time and more efficiency get your crucial ddr5 ram today using the link down in the description below the keynote among you might notice that our hats happen to be missing the uh torso part but that's okay because that only really matters for speaker testing and we're gonna be focused on headphones and microphones for the time being also the torso is a plastic tub that adds twenty thousand dollars to the cost so i'll pass now understandably you might actually feel the same way about the has part couldn't we just use any plastic head the answer is no there is a method to the madness here this form of hearing simulator was first created in the 1980s to accommodate the testing of phones and hearing aids you see the thing about hearing devices is that depending on the conditions they can perform dramatically differently you can try this for yourself lift your headphones off your ear like this sounds pretty different right so these state-of-the-art hats models from just a couple of years ago both claim to better represent a headphones real world performance by simulating not just the shape of a human head so you get a good seal but also even the ear canal both of them are also equipped with high performance microphones allowing us to test the full range of human hearing with both of them costing about as much as an actual human head don't ask me how i know so why not just hire trusted listeners to evaluate headphones for us it's because listening is a subjective experience that can be influenced by your mood your biases and even your um state of mind man that means that any product review that relies solely on a human evaluator will be inherently unreliable now we could look at the spec sheet but a shocking number of audio manufacturers seem to be pretty much copy pasting the same performance numbers alongside vague posting nonsense like next level listening or we retain the emotion of the sound so i guess we can't trust them either what do if you've ever read or watched headphone reviews you might have seen something like this before it's called a frequency response graph and it's meant to help us visualize the sound signature of an audio device the left end of the x-axis represents the lowest bass sounds that humans can hear about 20 hertz and the right end represents the highest treble frequencies that humans can hear around 20 000 hertz with these we can chew through manufacturer claims like a hot head chews through butter some might claim to have a neutral sound for example but actually they have the base cranked up so high it would wake up your neighbors to measure these numbers though we need to start with the right gear let's get acquainted with our potential suitors here then bachelor number one is the b k 5128 type b and aside from having obviously better microphones it improves upon its 1981 predecessor in a few ways for the ear canal bnk averaged mri scans of 40 test subjects to give it a longer more human-like shape and instead of using purely soft rubber they added plastic components to the inner parts to represent the acoustic effect of the bonier inner ear now for bachelor number two sort of the hms 2.3 ln hec aka the super hms comes from head acoustics and by their own admission it is actually based on the b k 5128 but simplified it has a shorter ear canal and is made of just rubber resulting in slightly looser tolerances for acoustic impedance both below 80 hertz and above 12 kilohertz not ideal but the larger diaphragm of the super hms's microphone results in a lower noise floor which means slightly improved performance in certain other tests like distortion now there was a bachelor number three right here but our headphone test engineer has actually worked with that model before and thinks that it is crap so we didn't even bother renting one now at this point at least on paper it seems like the 5128 is the obvious choice but a lot of that is based on manufacturer claims which is not how our lab is supposed to work so we spent the last few weeks which cost us thousands of dollars in rentals by the way validating those claims and searching for potential flaws while looking fabulous of course wan hoodies now in stock lttstore.com as for why it took so long to test i'm really glad you asked we needed to run two sets of tests one comparing the heads to each other head to head you might say and the other comparing the heads to 25 of our own fleshy guinea pigs i mean excuse me employees that's for a human to machine comparison now the demographics of our company are not representative of the general public got a lot of default character creation screen dudes here but after some adjustments to our calculations to compensate we were ready to measure the base of eight different headphones on each of our human subjects why only bass okay we wanted to measure treble as well but because treble sound waves are very short a 15 kilohertz wave is actually less than an inch the microphone position needs to be very precise across all of the test subjects which we didn't have time to deal with during our short-term headlones bass waves on the other hand are very long a 20 hertz sound wave is 55 feet in length so microphone placement doesn't require the same level of precision across our human subjects to acquire comparable results and besides in our head-to-head testing data we found only small differences in the treble range between the two heads so we proceeded with our human testing which oh apparently i'm next let's go step one is our subject gets to place microphones into their ears like how i don't know how so the first step would be to sanitize your hands and also sanitize your ears that makes sense even in not covered times when you're talking like ear goop look at it go this is for the inside of your ears now we have to place the microphones this is the left ear okay here you do the left one then i'll do the right one okay it goes inside your ears like this it does not necessarily fit everyone for some it's a bit too small and it just keeps coming out something you might be familiar with this is cool there's a microphone right here they look right and then this little guy sits in your ear a little something like i guess it goes kind of like that okay and then this goes here okay so then put the headphones on the way you normally would okay then i'm going to play a noise our headphone test engineer just played pink noise through the headphones for me which you could think of kind of like pink noise is tuned more for human hearing so it doesn't sound so harsh to us now i take them off i put them back on yeah every time we put on our headphones we do it a little differently maybe the band is here or maybe it's more like here or maybe our kids are playing around with all the adjustments and that's the second pass okay and we do that five times with every subject yeah now these are open-backed headphones is it a problem that people are clicking their mouses and stuff again we're not in a controlled lab environment so that's expected they will not miss an opportunity to remind me that the current conditions are not perfect i know over 1 000 measurements later the resulting average looked like this so how does that match up to our heads the quick and dirty version is that with open back headphones we found a measurable but minor variance between the two units and between our human test subjects but both of these are within what we'd consider to be an acceptable range our engineer isn't ready for video appearances yet but he will be publishing a more detailed write-up on flow plane for those of you who want to dig a little bit deeper into why we consider that okay shifting gears to a popular closed back headphone we see a much different story look at this variance in humans at 40 hertz 14 decibels that means that some people would be perceiving more than twice as much bass compared to others completely changing the listening experience this is because closed back headphones rely on a proper seal to create their base comparing our heads however again they're pretty close but the 5128 measured slightly closer to our humans than the super hms so both heads get a pass here but the 5128 it gets a gold star we also tested some in-ears that are known to cause problems for hats in general and found that this issue was present in both of our models meaning that these had struggled to get a good seal on some larger iems two more passes but this time with unhappy stickers because it means no matter which way we go i'll eventually have to replace this darn thing really anyhoo i guess it kind of makes sense that our results have been so close given that both of these models are based on the same design and that both are considered industry standard testing equipment we do however have a winner the bnk 5128 some may disagree with our assessment some might not think it's worthwhile to get any head and torso simulator because the greater body of academic headphone research has been done on older simulators and is therefore less applicable to this new hardware but we feel that we can take the current knowledge base and adapt it to the newer models to get the best of both worlds the best research and the best tech to be clear the super hms is still an excellent product and a major improvement over its predecessor but the things that pushed us toward the bnk where it's ease of use improved durability and better reputation i'm happy with our choices but there's a big but here i want to make it clear that our results here are not the be-all and end-all of audio testing at all and the testing that we end up doing in the future with the bnk 5128 it's not going to be the be all and end all either for one thing this simulator by design represents the average person and no one person is average especially not you as an ltt viewer you're decidedly above average so what that means is that the response curves that we get from this head will not directly reflect what you hear in your ears it's just that by adding some objective knowledge to your toolkit you can become a more informed consumer who can find the best headphones for your needs faster also at our lab the goal is to never be satisfied with good enough we're gonna spare no expense i mean really if i'm not putting my money where my mouth is at this point come on guys but there is always going to be room for improvement we know that our tests weren't perfect here for many reasons and no one is more critical about our testing protocols than the very people that we've hired to create them but our lab is still under construction and achieving our goal of industry-leading testing is going to take some time there's also just much more that we'd love to test outside of just the frequency response of headphones like the microphones noise cancelling distortion testing even trying to find ways to apply response curve data to the human perceptual system so if there are tests you guys would like to see let us know in the comments because this is just the beginning the beginning of this message from our sponsor who's going to help me pay for this enlisted is a free-to-play world war two multiplayer shooter available on pc ps5 ps4 xbox series x and s and xbox one with crossplay it is a focus on historical authenticity and gameplay that always keep you in the middle of the action you'll be placed in large-scale combat alongside dozens of soldiers vehicles and aircraft directly in famous historical campaigns like the invasion of normandy there's hundreds of firearms and specialized weapons from common ones seen throughout the war to rare prototypes you hardly see in other games there's even building construction and destructible items in the environment and if you use our link you'll get a free bonus just for signing up including three days of premium time and several orders for troops and weapons so head to the link in the description and start playing enlisted for free today thanks for watching if you're interested in more headphone content check out our video where we did some subjective testing of 35 knockoff airpods spoiler um our staff by and large actually preferred them to the real thingwe've already made some big investments into our testing lab a new building new talent and some crazy new equipment and we are finally ready to start talking about it see these two heads they're called hats or head and torso simulators they're for testing personal audio products and the ones in front of me cost a combined 80 000 us dollars which is why we definitely cannot afford to keep both of them what lies no please i'll do anything anything uh crucial's ddr5 ram is engineered to load transfer and download files faster with less lag time and more efficiency get your crucial ddr5 ram today using the link down in the description below the keynote among you might notice that our hats happen to be missing the uh torso part but that's okay because that only really matters for speaker testing and we're gonna be focused on headphones and microphones for the time being also the torso is a plastic tub that adds twenty thousand dollars to the cost so i'll pass now understandably you might actually feel the same way about the has part couldn't we just use any plastic head the answer is no there is a method to the madness here this form of hearing simulator was first created in the 1980s to accommodate the testing of phones and hearing aids you see the thing about hearing devices is that depending on the conditions they can perform dramatically differently you can try this for yourself lift your headphones off your ear like this sounds pretty different right so these state-of-the-art hats models from just a couple of years ago both claim to better represent a headphones real world performance by simulating not just the shape of a human head so you get a good seal but also even the ear canal both of them are also equipped with high performance microphones allowing us to test the full range of human hearing with both of them costing about as much as an actual human head don't ask me how i know so why not just hire trusted listeners to evaluate headphones for us it's because listening is a subjective experience that can be influenced by your mood your biases and even your um state of mind man that means that any product review that relies solely on a human evaluator will be inherently unreliable now we could look at the spec sheet but a shocking number of audio manufacturers seem to be pretty much copy pasting the same performance numbers alongside vague posting nonsense like next level listening or we retain the emotion of the sound so i guess we can't trust them either what do if you've ever read or watched headphone reviews you might have seen something like this before it's called a frequency response graph and it's meant to help us visualize the sound signature of an audio device the left end of the x-axis represents the lowest bass sounds that humans can hear about 20 hertz and the right end represents the highest treble frequencies that humans can hear around 20 000 hertz with these we can chew through manufacturer claims like a hot head chews through butter some might claim to have a neutral sound for example but actually they have the base cranked up so high it would wake up your neighbors to measure these numbers though we need to start with the right gear let's get acquainted with our potential suitors here then bachelor number one is the b k 5128 type b and aside from having obviously better microphones it improves upon its 1981 predecessor in a few ways for the ear canal bnk averaged mri scans of 40 test subjects to give it a longer more human-like shape and instead of using purely soft rubber they added plastic components to the inner parts to represent the acoustic effect of the bonier inner ear now for bachelor number two sort of the hms 2.3 ln hec aka the super hms comes from head acoustics and by their own admission it is actually based on the b k 5128 but simplified it has a shorter ear canal and is made of just rubber resulting in slightly looser tolerances for acoustic impedance both below 80 hertz and above 12 kilohertz not ideal but the larger diaphragm of the super hms's microphone results in a lower noise floor which means slightly improved performance in certain other tests like distortion now there was a bachelor number three right here but our headphone test engineer has actually worked with that model before and thinks that it is crap so we didn't even bother renting one now at this point at least on paper it seems like the 5128 is the obvious choice but a lot of that is based on manufacturer claims which is not how our lab is supposed to work so we spent the last few weeks which cost us thousands of dollars in rentals by the way validating those claims and searching for potential flaws while looking fabulous of course wan hoodies now in stock lttstore.com as for why it took so long to test i'm really glad you asked we needed to run two sets of tests one comparing the heads to each other head to head you might say and the other comparing the heads to 25 of our own fleshy guinea pigs i mean excuse me employees that's for a human to machine comparison now the demographics of our company are not representative of the general public got a lot of default character creation screen dudes here but after some adjustments to our calculations to compensate we were ready to measure the base of eight different headphones on each of our human subjects why only bass okay we wanted to measure treble as well but because treble sound waves are very short a 15 kilohertz wave is actually less than an inch the microphone position needs to be very precise across all of the test subjects which we didn't have time to deal with during our short-term headlones bass waves on the other hand are very long a 20 hertz sound wave is 55 feet in length so microphone placement doesn't require the same level of precision across our human subjects to acquire comparable results and besides in our head-to-head testing data we found only small differences in the treble range between the two heads so we proceeded with our human testing which oh apparently i'm next let's go step one is our subject gets to place microphones into their ears like how i don't know how so the first step would be to sanitize your hands and also sanitize your ears that makes sense even in not covered times when you're talking like ear goop look at it go this is for the inside of your ears now we have to place the microphones this is the left ear okay here you do the left one then i'll do the right one okay it goes inside your ears like this it does not necessarily fit everyone for some it's a bit too small and it just keeps coming out something you might be familiar with this is cool there's a microphone right here they look right and then this little guy sits in your ear a little something like i guess it goes kind of like that okay and then this goes here okay so then put the headphones on the way you normally would okay then i'm going to play a noise our headphone test engineer just played pink noise through the headphones for me which you could think of kind of like pink noise is tuned more for human hearing so it doesn't sound so harsh to us now i take them off i put them back on yeah every time we put on our headphones we do it a little differently maybe the band is here or maybe it's more like here or maybe our kids are playing around with all the adjustments and that's the second pass okay and we do that five times with every subject yeah now these are open-backed headphones is it a problem that people are clicking their mouses and stuff again we're not in a controlled lab environment so that's expected they will not miss an opportunity to remind me that the current conditions are not perfect i know over 1 000 measurements later the resulting average looked like this so how does that match up to our heads the quick and dirty version is that with open back headphones we found a measurable but minor variance between the two units and between our human test subjects but both of these are within what we'd consider to be an acceptable range our engineer isn't ready for video appearances yet but he will be publishing a more detailed write-up on flow plane for those of you who want to dig a little bit deeper into why we consider that okay shifting gears to a popular closed back headphone we see a much different story look at this variance in humans at 40 hertz 14 decibels that means that some people would be perceiving more than twice as much bass compared to others completely changing the listening experience this is because closed back headphones rely on a proper seal to create their base comparing our heads however again they're pretty close but the 5128 measured slightly closer to our humans than the super hms so both heads get a pass here but the 5128 it gets a gold star we also tested some in-ears that are known to cause problems for hats in general and found that this issue was present in both of our models meaning that these had struggled to get a good seal on some larger iems two more passes but this time with unhappy stickers because it means no matter which way we go i'll eventually have to replace this darn thing really anyhoo i guess it kind of makes sense that our results have been so close given that both of these models are based on the same design and that both are considered industry standard testing equipment we do however have a winner the bnk 5128 some may disagree with our assessment some might not think it's worthwhile to get any head and torso simulator because the greater body of academic headphone research has been done on older simulators and is therefore less applicable to this new hardware but we feel that we can take the current knowledge base and adapt it to the newer models to get the best of both worlds the best research and the best tech to be clear the super hms is still an excellent product and a major improvement over its predecessor but the things that pushed us toward the bnk where it's ease of use improved durability and better reputation i'm happy with our choices but there's a big but here i want to make it clear that our results here are not the be-all and end-all of audio testing at all and the testing that we end up doing in the future with the bnk 5128 it's not going to be the be all and end all either for one thing this simulator by design represents the average person and no one person is average especially not you as an ltt viewer you're decidedly above average so what that means is that the response curves that we get from this head will not directly reflect what you hear in your ears it's just that by adding some objective knowledge to your toolkit you can become a more informed consumer who can find the best headphones for your needs faster also at our lab the goal is to never be satisfied with good enough we're gonna spare no expense i mean really if i'm not putting my money where my mouth is at this point come on guys but there is always going to be room for improvement we know that our tests weren't perfect here for many reasons and no one is more critical about our testing protocols than the very people that we've hired to create them but our lab is still under construction and achieving our goal of industry-leading testing is going to take some time there's also just much more that we'd love to test outside of just the frequency response of headphones like the microphones noise cancelling distortion testing even trying to find ways to apply response curve data to the human perceptual system so if there are tests you guys would like to see let us know in the comments because this is just the beginning the beginning of this message from our sponsor who's going to help me pay for this enlisted is a free-to-play world war two multiplayer shooter available on pc ps5 ps4 xbox series x and s and xbox one with crossplay it is a focus on historical authenticity and gameplay that always keep you in the middle of the action you'll be placed in large-scale combat alongside dozens of soldiers vehicles and aircraft directly in famous historical campaigns like the invasion of normandy there's hundreds of firearms and specialized weapons from common ones seen throughout the war to rare prototypes you hardly see in other games there's even building construction and destructible items in the environment and if you use our link you'll get a free bonus just for signing up including three days of premium time and several orders for troops and weapons so head to the link in the description and start playing enlisted for free today thanks for watching if you're interested in more headphone content check out our video where we did some subjective testing of 35 knockoff airpods spoiler um our staff by and large actually preferred them to the real thing\n"