The Kosher Status of Clean Meat: A Complex Issue

In recent years, advancements in technology have enabled the production of clean meat, which is created by taking genetic material from an animal and generating it to produce meat. However, the question arises as to whether this product would be considered kosher.

At first glance, it may seem that if the cells used to create the meat are taken from an animal that was not slaughtered according to kosher standards, then the end product would not be kosher. Additionally, even though the initial amount of genetic material is minimal and microscopic, any component derived from it would also be non-kosher. However, if the stem cells or materials used in the production process come from a kosher-slaughtered animal, then the resulting meat would be considered kosher.

This raises another question: if the clean meat is derived ultimately from an animal's genetic material and has been created through a process that replicates the animal's characteristics, then it could be argued that it should still be treated as meat. However, some argue that even though the initial product may seem like meat, its creation process and origin make it different enough to warrant separate treatment.

The halacha MAOIS Iron states that people should not suspect they are consuming non-kosher food when eating certain products. For example, if someone were to cook meat in almond milk, they would need to indicate that the two foods were not being consumed together due to their biblical prohibition on mixing meat and dairy. This brings us to the question of whether clean meat, which is created through a process that replicates the animal's characteristics, should be treated similarly.

The OU's position on this matter is likely to be that clean meat would be considered pareve, or neutral, rather than meat. This decision is based on the desire for consensus and clarity in the community. However, there are differing opinions among scholars on this topic, with some arguing that since clean meat has been created through a process that replicates an animal's characteristics, it should not be considered kosher.

One interesting perspective comes from the Med risch, where Schuler quotes Eva as stating that if something is created miraculously and has no relation to its original source, then it does not require shechita. This approach suggests that clean meat, which is created through a process that replicates an animal's characteristics but ultimately comes from a non-kosher source, should not be considered kosher.

The development of clean meat technology has significant implications for the kosher community. While there are differing opinions on its status, it is clear that this issue will continue to be debated and discussed among scholars and communities in the years to come. Ultimately, the goal of creating a consensus opinion on the kosher status of clean meat may require further study and consideration of the complexities involved.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enin terms of this new technology of clean meat of this taking the genetic material of an animal and generating it and producing meat so is it kosher or not it would seem that if the cells that we take from an animal that was not slaughtered that the end product would not be kosher because our yield Sunna are so awesome if it's derived from something not kosher and also since in this case it's a moment it's an essential to creating the product even though it will be tiny tiny amounts microscopic amounts that which is derived from it would be not kosher however if the stem cells or the material that is being used is from a kosher slaughtered animal then it would be kosher the next question will be even if it's kosher is it meat was a part do we consider this posture because it's derived ultimately from from and stem cells of the genetic achieve an animal and more significantly because it is exactly genetically meat so is this considered basa pause this considered power so we've turned to many post-game within the oue to ask this question initially we thought that this would be power because even though the initial product is was as a meat derived you know cells but it's a tiny amount that which is grown subsequently is outside the animal and therefore it would be it would be path even though something can be can be meat that which is derived from does not nice to make it muscle the most dramatic example of course is milk milk is comes from an animal but it it's it's it's obviously not meet its milk so you know is it fallacious is it path however other post-game thought amongst them one prominent post kubernetes well sure Weiss and also the modified gross of an Iraq war the opinion that since in all its qualities especially in terms of genetic make makeup it's it's it's exactly identical to meet that it has the status of meat even if we do to consider it power of like the initial position we would still have to treat it in many respects like meek because of the halacha MAOIs iron that people shouldn't suspect that you're eating this together with milk of you if you would be cooking it with with cheese and making a cheeseburger so because of the question of mouse iron it would still have to be treated carefully and as the halacha says Okinawa if a person would take meat and cook it in almond milk that he'd in order to indicate that it's that he's not cooking meat milk together which is which is biblically prohibited he would have to put some almonds on the table or next to that almond milk so people would understand that this is almond milk and that milk devised from a from a cow so this matter whether we considered bossa UPOV is an interesting question costly not dealing with it the OU's position is likely to be that we consider it pass up because of the because we want to have a consensus opinion about it I'm I only want to cite one interesting position in the Med risch the mattress has the discussion the biscuit Schuler quotes it and is quoted in the shallow that just that if something was created this is the what the pH Eva discusses if something meet what was created miraculously from the safe is Eva that that meat or on Cal that was created that way that would not require schreeten because it's no longer related to a naturally born cow and therefore it's completely separate and even though in every respect it's identical it would not be considered he would not be considered ba so whether that conserve am a drastic source can serve as a source for Halawa is a matter of dispute and discussion but the development and the impact for us is very very significant youin terms of this new technology of clean meat of this taking the genetic material of an animal and generating it and producing meat so is it kosher or not it would seem that if the cells that we take from an animal that was not slaughtered that the end product would not be kosher because our yield Sunna are so awesome if it's derived from something not kosher and also since in this case it's a moment it's an essential to creating the product even though it will be tiny tiny amounts microscopic amounts that which is derived from it would be not kosher however if the stem cells or the material that is being used is from a kosher slaughtered animal then it would be kosher the next question will be even if it's kosher is it meat was a part do we consider this posture because it's derived ultimately from from and stem cells of the genetic achieve an animal and more significantly because it is exactly genetically meat so is this considered basa pause this considered power so we've turned to many post-game within the oue to ask this question initially we thought that this would be power because even though the initial product is was as a meat derived you know cells but it's a tiny amount that which is grown subsequently is outside the animal and therefore it would be it would be path even though something can be can be meat that which is derived from does not nice to make it muscle the most dramatic example of course is milk milk is comes from an animal but it it's it's it's obviously not meet its milk so you know is it fallacious is it path however other post-game thought amongst them one prominent post kubernetes well sure Weiss and also the modified gross of an Iraq war the opinion that since in all its qualities especially in terms of genetic make makeup it's it's it's exactly identical to meet that it has the status of meat even if we do to consider it power of like the initial position we would still have to treat it in many respects like meek because of the halacha MAOIs iron that people shouldn't suspect that you're eating this together with milk of you if you would be cooking it with with cheese and making a cheeseburger so because of the question of mouse iron it would still have to be treated carefully and as the halacha says Okinawa if a person would take meat and cook it in almond milk that he'd in order to indicate that it's that he's not cooking meat milk together which is which is biblically prohibited he would have to put some almonds on the table or next to that almond milk so people would understand that this is almond milk and that milk devised from a from a cow so this matter whether we considered bossa UPOV is an interesting question costly not dealing with it the OU's position is likely to be that we consider it pass up because of the because we want to have a consensus opinion about it I'm I only want to cite one interesting position in the Med risch the mattress has the discussion the biscuit Schuler quotes it and is quoted in the shallow that just that if something was created this is the what the pH Eva discusses if something meet what was created miraculously from the safe is Eva that that meat or on Cal that was created that way that would not require schreeten because it's no longer related to a naturally born cow and therefore it's completely separate and even though in every respect it's identical it would not be considered he would not be considered ba so whether that conserve am a drastic source can serve as a source for Halawa is a matter of dispute and discussion but the development and the impact for us is very very significant you\n"