Why You Should STILL Consider an X79 Board in 2019!

The World of CPU Performance: A 2013 vs 2018 Comparison

In this article, we'll delve into the world of CPU performance, specifically comparing the powerhouses of 2013 and 2018. We'll explore how far performance has come, what new features have been introduced, and which platforms reign supreme.

One of the most significant differences between 2013 and 2018 is the chipset. In 2013, we had X79, which was a beast of a platform that required a separate chipset to operate. This meant that the CPU would need to go through the chipset before being fed into the motherboard, resulting in slower performance compared to newer platforms like UBS 2 slots. In contrast, newer platforms like Z390 and X470 offer direct connectivity to the CPU, eliminating any slowdowns from DMI 3.0 versus 2.0.

When it comes to storage, 2018 offers a significant upgrade over 2013. The introduction of NVMe drives on PCIe slots has increased performance by leaps and bounds. These drives can reach speeds of up to 5000 MB/s, making them ideal for applications that require high-speed data transfer. In contrast, older platforms like X79 often rely on slower storage solutions, which can bottleneck the system's overall performance.

Another area where 2018 outshines 2013 is in the realm of USB connectivity. The introduction of USB 3 and even Type-C has increased speeds to new heights, making it possible to transfer data at unprecedented rates. In contrast, older platforms often rely on slower USB versions, which can limit the system's overall performance.

One of the most significant advantages of newer platforms like Z390 and X470 is their enthusiast nature. These platforms offer CPUs like the 1680 v2, which boast base clocks of 3 GHz, with users able to overclock them up to 4.6 GHz with decent cooling solutions and good motherboards. This represents a 50% increase in clock speed compared to older platforms.

However, the overclocking gains in 2018 are not as dramatic as they once were. The introduction of new instruction sets like AVX2 and FMA3 has improved performance, but these gains have been somewhat muted by the complexity of modern workloads. In contrast, older platforms like X79 often offer more straightforward overclocking options, which can result in significant performance gains.

When it comes to enthusiast systems, the most significant advantage of newer platforms is their simplicity. Older platforms like X99 require a higher degree of finesse and expertise to overclock, whereas newer platforms offer more plug-and-play solutions. This makes them ideal for system builders who want to create high-performance systems without breaking the bank.

In conclusion, while 2013 still has its advantages, especially when it comes to price performance, the gap between old and new has narrowed significantly in recent years. The introduction of new features like NVMe drives, USB 3, and Type-C has increased performance by leaps and bounds, making newer platforms like Z390 and X470 the clear winner. However, for system builders who value simplicity and ease of use, older platforms like X79 still have their place.

Looking ahead to our upcoming videos and comments, we'd love to hear from you about your experiences with X79 or whether this video has brought back some nostalgic memories. We'll be testing out new benchmarks, including gaming and productivity tests, as well as input lag analysis, which we're a bit concerned might actually show us going backwards. All will be revealed in the coming days.

Finally, if you enjoyed today's video, be sure to hit that like button and let us know in the comments section below. We appreciate your feedback and look forward to continuing the conversation with you soon.