Another App Store Lawsuit Threatens Apple's Dominance

The lawsuit against Apple has revealed some shocking details about the company's business practices, including how it locks down its payment system and restricts cross-platform digital wallets. Prosecutors claim that Apple is imposing restrictions, fees, and taxes on how apps are created and distributed, making it difficult for developers to compete with the App Store.

The lawsuit also targets Apple's iMessage service, which undermines the quality and functionality of rival smartphones when used by iPhone users who chat with Android users. The green versus blue bubble debate has become a contentious issue, as Apple's messaging system signals to consumers that if they don't have an iPhone, their experience is worse. Prosecutors argue that this practice is anti-competitive and limits consumer choice.

Furthermore, the lawsuit claims that Apple has blocked in-app payment methods and prevented developers from offering cloud gaming apps, which would reduce dependence on the iPhone. This limitation stifles innovation and competition, according to prosecutors. The lawsuit also points out that Apple's App Store is a major focus, as it requires developers to use its payment system, lock in both developers and users.

The lawsuit takes a sharp jab at Steve Jobs himself, who allegedly told an unnamed executive in 2010 that Apple would force developers to use its payment system. Prosecutors claim that this statement demonstrates Apple's willingness to stifle competition and limit consumer choice. The lawsuit also highlights Apple's restrictions on the Apple Watch, which only works with the iPhone and not Android.

Prosecutors argue that these practices are anticompetitive and undermine innovation in the tech industry. They point out that Samsung and Google do not charge banks fees for transactions, unlike Apple Pay. The lawsuit seeks to label Apple an unlawful monopoly and force the company to stop engaging in anti-competitive practices.

The implications of this lawsuit could be significant. If successful, it would likely mean that Apple would need to allow apps that work across platforms, let the Apple Watch work with Android, and allow users to tap to pay with an iPhone using a digital wallet other than Apple Pay. This could make it easier for consumers to switch their lives over to Android or mix and match their smart accessories and digital services with those not made by Apple.

The government has joined forces with 15 states and the District of Columbia in this lawsuit, which is likely to be a landmark case in the tech industry. The legal battle could stretch out for years, similar to the Department of Justice's suit against Microsoft in 1998. That lawsuit resulted in Microsoft changing its practice, but it remains to be seen whether this lawsuit will have a similar outcome.

Apple has stated that the lawsuit threatens who they are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets. The company emphasizes that it is legal for companies to adopt policies or designs that competitors may not like, as long as it makes using the iPhone a better experience. However, prosecutors argue that this practice sets a dangerous precedent, empowering government to take a heavy hand in designing people's technology.

Apple plans to file a motion to dismiss the case within the next 60 days, emphasizing that allowing users to use alternatives to Apple Pay or to switch between platforms would make their products less desirable. The company argues that it is legal for companies to dictate how their products are used and that this lawsuit threatens the very principles of innovation and competition in the tech industry.

As the case unfolds, consumers will be watching closely to see if Apple's dominance can be challenged. If successful, the outcome could have significant implications for the tech industry and consumer choice.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enthe US Department of Justice is suing Apple over what it calls an iPhone Monopoly and the government wants Apple to change the way Apple products are designed to work the case revolves around the Apple ecosystem and this idea of the Walled Garden where users can feel locked into stain with an iPhone when certain Apple Services only work with Apple products or how the Apple watch only works with the iPhone or how it can be difficult or expensive for users and app makers to leave the iPhone phone to use another app store the lawsuit even calls out how tap to pay on the iPhone is also locked down to the Apple wallet in the 88 page lawsuit prosecutors say apple deployed what it called a Playbook to keep the iPhone on top with its App Store that would quote extract higher fees thwart Innovation and offer a less secure or degraded user experience and throttle competitive Alternatives in a statement Apple says this lawsuit threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets if successful it would hinder our ability to create the kind of Technology people expect from Apple where Hardware software and services intersect Apple goes on to say that this lawsuit would set a dangerous precedent quote empowering government to take a heavy hand in designing people's technology the New York Times reports that Apple plans to file a motion to dismiss the case in the next 60 days and Apple will emphasize that it is legal to adopt policies or designs that competitors may not like if it makes using the iPhone a better experience this may become a landmark case and the legal battle could stretch out for years it could be similar to when the Department of Justice sued Microsoft in 1998 accusing Microsoft of monopolizing Internet Explorer for Windows and it resulted in Microsoft changing its practice but as for this case against Apple the US government has joined forces with 15 states and the District of Colombia to lay out a number of examples of Apple hindering competition and it sweeps across several of Apple's products the lawsuit starts with a tale of an unnamed Apple executive who went straight to Steve Jobs in 2010 to complain about the way an ad showed a woman switching from her iPhone to an Android to use her Kindle e- reader prosecutors took a sharp jab at jobs himself saying that he was quote clear in his response Apple would force developers to use its payment system to lock in both developers and users the App Store is a big focus it says apple is imposing restrictions fees and taxes on how apps are created and distributed the lawsuit points to how Apple blocks inapp payment methods and another issue is around Cloud streaming apps claiming Apple prevented developers from offering cloud gaming apps that would reduce dependence on the iPhone there's another Focus around text messaging and how iMessage is made to be easier to use than other third party messaging apps and yes the green versus blue bubble debate is part of this the lawsuit claims iMessage undermines the quality and functionality of rival smartphones when an iPhone user chats with someone on Android it shows their chat bubble is green and that means the person's conversation cannot be encrypted their videos shared are pixelated and grainy and the users in those comos can't edit messages or see typing indicators and it signals to a family that if they don't have an iPhone well the experience is worse and the doj argument is that Apple could change that the lawsuit points to Apple Executives that said moving iMessages to Android would hurt apple and CEO Tim Cook was also called out right when Apple launched the iPhone 14 cook was on stage at Vox media's code 2022 conference and on stage he was asked if Apple could fix the iPhone to Android messaging problems so it would be easier to text seamlessly with a parent who has an Android phone and to that cook said buy your mom and iPhone the lawsuit also goes into the Apple watch how it only works with the iPhone and not Android and if you have another brand of Smartwatch your abilities of what it can do with the iPhone are limited certain notifications on the iPhone may not come through on another Smartwatch or a user may not be able to take the same actions like they could with an Apple Watch there are complaints in this lawsuit about how Apple restricts crossplatform digital wallets blocking other developers from making a digital wallet that has tapped to to pay and the lawsuit also calls out Apple pay for extracting fees from banks for transactions saying that Samsung and Google do not charge Banks so what comes from all of this prosecutors are asking that a federal judge label Apple an unlawful Monopoly and force Apple to stop engaging in anti-competitive practices that could include forcing Apple to let the Apple watch work with Android or letting you tap to pay with an iPhone and use something besides Apple pay it could mean Apple would need to to allow apps that work across platforms and in the end all of this could make it easier for consumers to switch their life over to Android or mix and match their smart accessories or Digital Services with ones not made by Apple and yes it could be the end of the green and blue iMessage bubbles or at least end some of the annoyances that happen when an iPhone user texts with an Android User we will be hearing more about this over time so be sure to subscribe as we keep following the developments but for now sound off in the comments about what are your first reactions to this lawsuit is the Apple wal Garden a problem for you would you want to see something changed let us know and thanks for watchingthe US Department of Justice is suing Apple over what it calls an iPhone Monopoly and the government wants Apple to change the way Apple products are designed to work the case revolves around the Apple ecosystem and this idea of the Walled Garden where users can feel locked into stain with an iPhone when certain Apple Services only work with Apple products or how the Apple watch only works with the iPhone or how it can be difficult or expensive for users and app makers to leave the iPhone phone to use another app store the lawsuit even calls out how tap to pay on the iPhone is also locked down to the Apple wallet in the 88 page lawsuit prosecutors say apple deployed what it called a Playbook to keep the iPhone on top with its App Store that would quote extract higher fees thwart Innovation and offer a less secure or degraded user experience and throttle competitive Alternatives in a statement Apple says this lawsuit threatens who we are and the principles that set Apple products apart in fiercely competitive markets if successful it would hinder our ability to create the kind of Technology people expect from Apple where Hardware software and services intersect Apple goes on to say that this lawsuit would set a dangerous precedent quote empowering government to take a heavy hand in designing people's technology the New York Times reports that Apple plans to file a motion to dismiss the case in the next 60 days and Apple will emphasize that it is legal to adopt policies or designs that competitors may not like if it makes using the iPhone a better experience this may become a landmark case and the legal battle could stretch out for years it could be similar to when the Department of Justice sued Microsoft in 1998 accusing Microsoft of monopolizing Internet Explorer for Windows and it resulted in Microsoft changing its practice but as for this case against Apple the US government has joined forces with 15 states and the District of Colombia to lay out a number of examples of Apple hindering competition and it sweeps across several of Apple's products the lawsuit starts with a tale of an unnamed Apple executive who went straight to Steve Jobs in 2010 to complain about the way an ad showed a woman switching from her iPhone to an Android to use her Kindle e- reader prosecutors took a sharp jab at jobs himself saying that he was quote clear in his response Apple would force developers to use its payment system to lock in both developers and users the App Store is a big focus it says apple is imposing restrictions fees and taxes on how apps are created and distributed the lawsuit points to how Apple blocks inapp payment methods and another issue is around Cloud streaming apps claiming Apple prevented developers from offering cloud gaming apps that would reduce dependence on the iPhone there's another Focus around text messaging and how iMessage is made to be easier to use than other third party messaging apps and yes the green versus blue bubble debate is part of this the lawsuit claims iMessage undermines the quality and functionality of rival smartphones when an iPhone user chats with someone on Android it shows their chat bubble is green and that means the person's conversation cannot be encrypted their videos shared are pixelated and grainy and the users in those comos can't edit messages or see typing indicators and it signals to a family that if they don't have an iPhone well the experience is worse and the doj argument is that Apple could change that the lawsuit points to Apple Executives that said moving iMessages to Android would hurt apple and CEO Tim Cook was also called out right when Apple launched the iPhone 14 cook was on stage at Vox media's code 2022 conference and on stage he was asked if Apple could fix the iPhone to Android messaging problems so it would be easier to text seamlessly with a parent who has an Android phone and to that cook said buy your mom and iPhone the lawsuit also goes into the Apple watch how it only works with the iPhone and not Android and if you have another brand of Smartwatch your abilities of what it can do with the iPhone are limited certain notifications on the iPhone may not come through on another Smartwatch or a user may not be able to take the same actions like they could with an Apple Watch there are complaints in this lawsuit about how Apple restricts crossplatform digital wallets blocking other developers from making a digital wallet that has tapped to to pay and the lawsuit also calls out Apple pay for extracting fees from banks for transactions saying that Samsung and Google do not charge Banks so what comes from all of this prosecutors are asking that a federal judge label Apple an unlawful Monopoly and force Apple to stop engaging in anti-competitive practices that could include forcing Apple to let the Apple watch work with Android or letting you tap to pay with an iPhone and use something besides Apple pay it could mean Apple would need to to allow apps that work across platforms and in the end all of this could make it easier for consumers to switch their life over to Android or mix and match their smart accessories or Digital Services with ones not made by Apple and yes it could be the end of the green and blue iMessage bubbles or at least end some of the annoyances that happen when an iPhone user texts with an Android User we will be hearing more about this over time so be sure to subscribe as we keep following the developments but for now sound off in the comments about what are your first reactions to this lawsuit is the Apple wal Garden a problem for you would you want to see something changed let us know and thanks for watching\n"