Apple is HIDING some differences in these M2 MacBook Airs…

I was a little bit disappointed in the performance of both the base model MacBook Air and the M2 MacBook Pro last month when I tested Final Cut Pro and noticed that while there was an improvement, it wasn't as big as I was expecting given the addition of ProRes media encoders. Well, I think I may have gotten to the bottom of that because when I ran the test on the 10-core MacBook Air, I expected it to be pretty much the same but where the M2 MacBook Pro took just under 8 minutes and the M2 MacBook Air base model took just over eight minutes, the 10-core MacBook Air managed to do it in 6 minutes and 25 seconds. That is nearly 2 minutes faster than what I was expecting and basically what this comes down to is that SSD because both of my other two M2 products here are the base models with that 256 gigabyte SSD and sure enough if we look at the system utilization while doing this Final Cut render, you'll notice that we're using swap memory. It's not very much; it can use up to two gigabytes and it's only using about half a gig or maybe a gig at times but because the base model has that slower SSD storage, it seems like the higher-end model is able to work more efficiently with that faster SSD and it's not just in Final Cut Pro in the Blender CPU render, the 10-core MacBook Air took 30 seconds less than the M2 MacBook Pro.

I was really surprised by this difference because I wasn't expecting it to be a two-minute difference that is pretty crazy but that's really the only thing I can think of as being the cause. But I'm curious to know whether you guys think that this is something that's important because we do have to talk about the fact that you know the MacBook Air is not exactly designed to be a powerhouse in the past before Apple Silicon. If I sat here and unironically made a video showing you Blender renders and Final Cut export times with 4K footage and all that stuff on a MacBook Air when it used to come with a Core i3, you'd be like Luke, what are you talking about this is just the base model? When people want and buy a MacBook, they don't care about any of this stuff so maybe it's just the fact that now the MacBook Air is actually feasible as a professional tool where it wasn't before that causes increased scrutiny. But I do think it's a little bit weird that for $1,200 you're not even able to really access the full potential of the M2 system because Apple cheated out on the SSD.

One thing is absolutely clear to me after all of this and that is do not buy the M2 MacBook Pro. The MacBook Air is the better deal even with the issues with the base model SSD even with the thermal throttling that we've talked about that we've seen on both of these devices. The MacBook Air and the MacBook Pro are not going to be as capable for high-performance tasks as the more expensive 14 and the 16-inch ones so you shouldn't buy these things expecting them to be able to do all of that and once you remove that expectation for sustained long-term heavy-duty performance, then the MacBook Pro loses all of its appeal. That's the only thing that it has going for it over the MacBook Air every single other aspect of this is better.

If your performance tasks are short and bursty, you're probably not going to notice the difference between this MacBook Air and the M2 MacBook Pro so why sacrifice the new thinner design, the bigger better display, the more beautiful color choices, the MagSafe port? Why would you give all that up just to get a couple of percent extra performance save a few seconds on your Blender renders? I think we've got some pretty clear answers from today's video. Number one, the MacBook Air is a better value overall than the M2 MacBook Pro and number two if you spend the extra $300 to get more and faster storage and more GPU cores, you can notice those differences.

So, I think it is worth it to go to the higher spec model but I don't think that that makes the base model a "quote-unquote bad deal" because at $1,200, and I'm sure it'll take just a couple of months before we start seeing these things at like $1,100 all that stuff, I think it's still honestly a pretty decent value. Let me know what you guys think of this comparison in the comments below and as usual, make sure to like, comment, and subscribe and with that, I'll see you guys in the next video.