**The Power of Gears: A Comparison of Mobile Editing Devices**
In this article, we'll delve into the world of mobile editing devices, specifically comparing the performance and features of various models. We'll take a closer look at the iRig Lissie, NAR Box, and others to determine which one reigns supreme.
**Wired Transfer: The Speed Test**
When it comes to transferring data between devices, speed is crucial. Let's start with the iRig Lissie, which uses a USB connection. In our test, we found that the wired transfer took approximately 5 minutes and 10 seconds to copy 7.7 gigabytes of data or 10 minutes of footage. This may seem like a significant amount of time, but consider that most projects require more than 10 minutes of video. The lossy app was capping out at around 25 megabits per second on a lightning port iPad, while the wired connection was slower.
**The NAR Box: A Wi-Fi Powerhouse**
Now, let's move on to the NAR Box, which boasts a Wi-Fi connection and a host of impressive features. With the NAR Box, you can import directly into Luma Fusion or Lightroom, saving you time and effort. In our test, we transferred data from the iRig Lissie to the NAR Box using Wi-Fi, which took approximately three minutes and 39 seconds. This was significantly faster than the wired transfer, making it an excellent option for those who prefer a wireless connection.
**The Limitations of Wi-Fi**
However, there is one limitation to consider when using Wi-Fi: speed. In our test, we found that the NAR Box's Wi-Fi connection was capped out at around 25 megabits per second, even with a faster device like an iPad Pro. This may not be ideal for those who require high-speed data transfer.
**Wired Transfer on the NAR Box**
Now, let's take a closer look at the wired transfer capabilities of the NAR Box. By changing the USB configuration in the settings, you can select USB mass transfer or use a USB-C Ethernet connection. This feature is unique to the NAR Box and allows for faster data transfer over a USB cable. Our test showed that the wired transfer took approximately two minutes and 90 seconds, which is significantly faster than the iRig Lissie.
**Interchangeable Batteries: A Game-Changer**
Another innovative feature of the NAR Box is its interchangeable battery system. This means that you can easily swap out batteries without having to recharge them. The 3000 milliamp hour battery provides up to 4-6 hours of on-time use, making it an excellent option for those who work on-the-go.
**Battery Efficiency and Charging**
The NAR Box's battery efficiency is also impressive, taking around an hour to charge the device to 80% and two hours to reach full capacity. This is a significant improvement over other devices, which can take significantly longer to recharge.
**The Rise of Small Companies: A Testament to Passion and Innovation**
In recent years, small companies have been making waves in the mobile editing device market. The NAR Box is a prime example of this, offering impressive features and performance at an affordable price point. What's truly remarkable about this company is their passion for innovation and customer satisfaction.
**The Future of Mobile Editing Devices**
As technology continues to evolve, we can expect to see even more innovative features in mobile editing devices. The iRig Lissie and NAR Box are pushing the boundaries of what's possible, and it's exciting to think about what the future holds. Whether you're a seasoned editor or just starting out, there's never been a better time to invest in a mobile editing device.
**Conclusion**
In conclusion, the comparison between mobile editing devices has revealed some surprising results. While the iRig Lissie excels in terms of wired transfer, the NAR Box takes the crown when it comes to Wi-Fi speed and features. The interchangeable battery system and excellent battery efficiency make the NAR Box an attractive option for those who work on-the-go. As we look to the future, one thing is clear: small companies are making a big impact in the world of mobile editing devices.