**AMD's Rison 9 CPU: A Strategic Move Against Intel**

The recent AMD presentation has sparked interest in the tech community, particularly with the announcement of their new Rison 9 CPU. This processor boasts a number of impressive features, including a significant die shrink from 14 nanometers to 7 nanometers. This reduction in size means that the CPU will use less power, allowing for more cores to be packed into the same package without increasing power consumption.

While some might have expected AMD to increase the core count to match Intel's offerings, this wouldn't necessarily provide a significant advantage. In fact, content creation and gaming typically don't require 8 cores or more, making this number of cores a sweet spot for most users. Additionally, prioritizing single-core IPC performance and higher clock speeds would be a more effective strategy against the competition.

Interestingly, even AMD's current 8-core offerings are competitive with Intel's CPUs from a value perspective. By optimizing their existing 8-core processors, AMD can position themselves to beat Intel at their own game, while waiting for Intel to respond with more powerful CPUs. Releasing a 16-core CPU now would be akin to playing one's trump card too early in the game, potentially leaving room for further strategic moves.

Moreover, most current applications barely utilize 8 cores, and thread Ripper technology is available for those who require additional processing power. The market demand for more expensive CPUs with higher core counts is limited, making such offerings less compelling to the average user.

In conclusion, AMD's Rison 9 CPU represents a strategic move against Intel, rather than an attempt to simply keep up with their competitors. By focusing on single-core IPC performance and higher clock speeds, AMD can create a more competitive product that effectively addresses the needs of most users.

**What do you think about this announcement? Share your thoughts in the comments section below!**

Would you like to see more videos like this one? Subscribe to our channel for more tech-related content!

And if you didn't enjoy this video, please let us know why in the comments. We'd love to hear your feedback and improve our content.

Until next time, bye for now!

WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enwho MD now as you probably know AMD has had their CES keynote recently and they announced some CPUs which didn't quite line up with the CPUs that everybody was kind of hoping for but this video will tell you why this is a good move from AMD and you shouldn't be disappointed that they didn't do a rise in 9:16 core 32 thread main stream CPU and why staying with a course is probably not the worst thing first off let's have a look at what the rumoured specs were going to be now according to various fairly unlikely seeming rumors around the Internet AMD was going to add a new kind of tier of CPUs that were gonna do a rise in nine line up which were going to have 16 cores and 32 threads for just over $500 and they were supposedly going to overclock to over 5 gigahertz which would have been insane for the rise in seven CPUs it would have gone up from 8 cores to 12 cores and 24 threads and over 5 gigahertz and the same story for Aizen 6 were they were gonna add more cause and Rison 3 they were gonna add more cause and now after having a look at the rumors let's look at what was actually kind of announced at this keynote presentation now we don't have a lot of information about the CPU its arisin 7 CPU from the 3000 series but we do know it's gonna be 8 course it's gonna be 16 threads we don't even know how high it's gonna overclock or what the base clock is gonna be we have very little information although we do have a view of a Cinebench run compared to a 9900 Kay and according to AMD they were both at kind of their standards straight out of the box settings and the rise in 3000 CPU edged out of the 9900 K which is fairly impressive because the 9900 K may be hot be very expensive but it is a very powerful CPU now the first reason is that one of the main changes is it's going down from 14 nanometers to 7 nanometers now this dye shrink does mean that the CPU would use less power which would mean you could theoretically put more cores in the same package with the same power consumption and you could also clock at higher and so on but one die shrink would not necessarily be able to take an 8 core CPU that can clock to 4.3 gigahertz to an architecture that can do 12 cause it over 5 gigahertz or 16 cores at over 5 gigahertz it just didn't seem particularly realistic now the second reason why I think beefing up the core count wasn't necessarily the best idea and I'm glad that AMD didn't do it is because 8 cores are a pretty good sweet spot at this point if you're doing content creation it's enough threads to kind of do it well and if you're gaming it's not too many threads that you have to sacrifice on core speed and honestly the main point in which especially Rison 7 is lacking compared to the competition things like the I $9.99 hundred K is not in core account and thread amount it's in actual single core IPC performance so if they take all of the juicy improvements they can get out of the 7 nanometer architecture and they squeeze that all into better single core performance and higher clock speeds it's going to be better for them against the competition than if they've just added more cause and reason number three honestly at this point even risin two is fairly competitive against the Intel CPUs that exist especially from a value perspective so if they can optimize their eight core CPUs they're gonna be beating Intel at their own game and then they can wait for Intel to respond with let's say a ten core I nine mainstream CPU and then AMD can release a more highly SPECT Rison CPU where if they just released a sixteen Corizon nine now that would kind of be like just playing your trump card right at the beginning of a game it's not necessarily the best strategic move and now they have some Headroom left potentially let's say theoretically that the architecture could produce a sixteen corner eyes a nine CPU they can hold off on that until Intel provides effective competition against the cpu like that because of you know market gouging and all that and in the final fourth reason is wealth Red River because most current applications like games barely even use 8 pours and if you do need the extra threads you have thread Ripper available I mean you can buy a 32 cor thread Ripper CPU so if they release this riser 9 CPU 16 cores is more than 99.999% of people need so if they did release a CPU why would you buy a more expensive CPU which has a more expensive motherboard platform there just isn't much of a point yes you have more memory channels and you can go from 64 gigs of up to 128 gigs potentially and you have more PCI Express Lanes and so on but it wouldn't be as compelling as it is now for a more professional market space and with that I kind of think that's all I have to say about that topic let me know in the comments section below what you felt about the news that came out of the AMD presentation there's obviously an Intel presentation happens but you know they didn't really announce anything other than the fact that they're gonna take out things of their CPUs which is a bit of a brave move I guess but you know the same thing goes for in videos keynote let me know in the comment section below actually what do you think of the new Radeon CPU now it seems like it's focused more towards content creators but if it performs the same as an RT X 2080 it's a very compelling option for people who game at 4k on a single graphics card anyway with that thank you very much for watching like the video if you liked it and subscribe to the channel for more videos like this one and if you didn't like it dislike it but tell me in the comment section below why you disliked it and until the next video bye minewho MD now as you probably know AMD has had their CES keynote recently and they announced some CPUs which didn't quite line up with the CPUs that everybody was kind of hoping for but this video will tell you why this is a good move from AMD and you shouldn't be disappointed that they didn't do a rise in 9:16 core 32 thread main stream CPU and why staying with a course is probably not the worst thing first off let's have a look at what the rumoured specs were going to be now according to various fairly unlikely seeming rumors around the Internet AMD was going to add a new kind of tier of CPUs that were gonna do a rise in nine line up which were going to have 16 cores and 32 threads for just over $500 and they were supposedly going to overclock to over 5 gigahertz which would have been insane for the rise in seven CPUs it would have gone up from 8 cores to 12 cores and 24 threads and over 5 gigahertz and the same story for Aizen 6 were they were gonna add more cause and Rison 3 they were gonna add more cause and now after having a look at the rumors let's look at what was actually kind of announced at this keynote presentation now we don't have a lot of information about the CPU its arisin 7 CPU from the 3000 series but we do know it's gonna be 8 course it's gonna be 16 threads we don't even know how high it's gonna overclock or what the base clock is gonna be we have very little information although we do have a view of a Cinebench run compared to a 9900 Kay and according to AMD they were both at kind of their standards straight out of the box settings and the rise in 3000 CPU edged out of the 9900 K which is fairly impressive because the 9900 K may be hot be very expensive but it is a very powerful CPU now the first reason is that one of the main changes is it's going down from 14 nanometers to 7 nanometers now this dye shrink does mean that the CPU would use less power which would mean you could theoretically put more cores in the same package with the same power consumption and you could also clock at higher and so on but one die shrink would not necessarily be able to take an 8 core CPU that can clock to 4.3 gigahertz to an architecture that can do 12 cause it over 5 gigahertz or 16 cores at over 5 gigahertz it just didn't seem particularly realistic now the second reason why I think beefing up the core count wasn't necessarily the best idea and I'm glad that AMD didn't do it is because 8 cores are a pretty good sweet spot at this point if you're doing content creation it's enough threads to kind of do it well and if you're gaming it's not too many threads that you have to sacrifice on core speed and honestly the main point in which especially Rison 7 is lacking compared to the competition things like the I $9.99 hundred K is not in core account and thread amount it's in actual single core IPC performance so if they take all of the juicy improvements they can get out of the 7 nanometer architecture and they squeeze that all into better single core performance and higher clock speeds it's going to be better for them against the competition than if they've just added more cause and reason number three honestly at this point even risin two is fairly competitive against the Intel CPUs that exist especially from a value perspective so if they can optimize their eight core CPUs they're gonna be beating Intel at their own game and then they can wait for Intel to respond with let's say a ten core I nine mainstream CPU and then AMD can release a more highly SPECT Rison CPU where if they just released a sixteen Corizon nine now that would kind of be like just playing your trump card right at the beginning of a game it's not necessarily the best strategic move and now they have some Headroom left potentially let's say theoretically that the architecture could produce a sixteen corner eyes a nine CPU they can hold off on that until Intel provides effective competition against the cpu like that because of you know market gouging and all that and in the final fourth reason is wealth Red River because most current applications like games barely even use 8 pours and if you do need the extra threads you have thread Ripper available I mean you can buy a 32 cor thread Ripper CPU so if they release this riser 9 CPU 16 cores is more than 99.999% of people need so if they did release a CPU why would you buy a more expensive CPU which has a more expensive motherboard platform there just isn't much of a point yes you have more memory channels and you can go from 64 gigs of up to 128 gigs potentially and you have more PCI Express Lanes and so on but it wouldn't be as compelling as it is now for a more professional market space and with that I kind of think that's all I have to say about that topic let me know in the comments section below what you felt about the news that came out of the AMD presentation there's obviously an Intel presentation happens but you know they didn't really announce anything other than the fact that they're gonna take out things of their CPUs which is a bit of a brave move I guess but you know the same thing goes for in videos keynote let me know in the comment section below actually what do you think of the new Radeon CPU now it seems like it's focused more towards content creators but if it performs the same as an RT X 2080 it's a very compelling option for people who game at 4k on a single graphics card anyway with that thank you very much for watching like the video if you liked it and subscribe to the channel for more videos like this one and if you didn't like it dislike it but tell me in the comment section below why you disliked it and until the next video bye mine