The Sapphire 5700 Pulse and Silent BIOS were put to the test in an inner poser setup to determine their performance and power consumption. The results showed that these two cards have similar power consumption, but with some key differences. For instance, the silent V bios is allowed to draw only 165 watts for the GPU only power, ignoring GG DR6 power and vrm efficiency losses. On the other hand, the OC V bios can draw up to 160 watts of power. The difference in power consumption between these two settings is quite significant.

In terms of thermal performance, both cards were tested with various BIOS settings, including the pulse and silent variants of each card. The results showed that the Sapphire RX 6700 Silent BIOS has the lowest GPU junction temperature when averaging at 1450 rpm fans beat, but it ends up being the same as the OC BIOS when averaging after the job is done to 1100 rpm. The Pulse with OC BIOS follows closely behind, with a Junction temperature of 79 degrees Celsius and an Edge temperature of 68.7 degrees Celsius.

The Power Color Red Dragon card also performed well in terms of thermal performance, but it required more power than the Sapphire cards. However, when running at 40 dB(A) noise level, the Red Dragon card's junction temperature was lower than the Pulse with OC BIOS. The Pulse with Silent V BIOS, on the other hand, had a Junction temperature of 73 degrees Celsius and an Edge temperature of 64.5 degrees Celsius.

The Power Color Red Dragon card also performed well in terms of frequency, with an average of 1732-1750 MHz, which is about 30-45 MHz higher than the Sapphire cards. However, it's worth noting that the frequency differences between these two cards are quite small, and they may not be noticeable in most games.

The Sapphire 5700 Pulse was compared to the Power Color Red Dragon card, as well as the reference model. The results showed that the Power Color Red Dragon card performed better than the Sapphire Pulse in terms of thermal performance. However, the Sapphire Pulse still performs well below the thermal requirements of everything on the card, giving it plenty of room to quiet down the fans if desired.

In conclusion, both the Sapphire 5700 Pulse and Silent BIOS cards perform well, but they may have some differences in terms of power consumption and thermal performance. The Power Color Red Dragon card performed slightly better than the Sapphire cards in terms of frequency and thermal performance, but it's worth noting that these differences are quite small.

The Sapphire 5700 Pulse is not a bad card by any means. It performs well below the thermal requirements of everything on the card, giving it plenty of room to quiet down the fans if desired. However, the Power Color Red Dragon card has a slight edge in terms of thermal performance and frequency. Therefore, if you prefer the look or can find stock of this card in your region, there's no problem with buying it.

In terms of noise normalization when all cards are at 40 dB(A), the Power Color Red Dragon card wins. However, this does not mean that the Sapphire Pulse is bad; rather, it means that the Power Color Red Dragon card performs slightly better in these conditions.

Overall, the Sapphire 5700 Pulse is a great option for those who want a well-performing graphics card without breaking the bank. It's easy to walk through thermally and acoustically, and it still manages to perform better than the reference model in many games. Therefore, if you're looking for a good graphics card that won't drain your wallet, the Sapphire 5700 Pulse is definitely worth considering.

In terms of performance, the Sapphire 5700 Pulse performs slightly worse than expected in most games. However, this is not necessarily a bad thing, as it may mean that the card is being driven harder by the system, resulting in better performance overall. Therefore, if you're looking for a good balance between price and performance, the Sapphire 5700 Pulse is definitely worth considering.

In conclusion, the Sapphire 5700 Pulse is a great option for those who want a well-performing graphics card without breaking the bank. It's easy to walk through thermally and acoustically, and it still manages to perform better than the reference model in many games. Therefore, if you're looking for a good graphics card that won't drain your wallet, the Sapphire 5700 Pulse is definitely worth considering.

The next part of the article will be on the thermal chart, which will show the full sweep of auto settings for each V BIOS on each of the two cards plus some reference numbers and 40 dB(A) numbers. The scoring will be based on junction temperature first, followed by Edge temperature.

In terms of thermal performance, the Sapphire RX 6700 Pulse and Silent BIOS have different performances depending on the average frequency during the fan operation. When averaging at 1450 rpm fans beat, the Sapphire RX 6700 Silent BIOS has the lowest GPU junction temperature. However, when averaging after the job is done to 1100 rpm, it ends up being the same as the OC BIOS. The Pulse with OC BIOS follows closely behind, with a Junction temperature of 79 degrees Celsius and an Edge temperature of 68.7 degrees Celsius.

The Power Color Red Dragon card also performed well in terms of thermal performance, but it required more power than the Sapphire cards. However, when running at 40 dB(A) noise level, its junction temperature was lower than the Pulse with OC BIOS.

The thermal chart will show that both the Sapphire RX 6700 Pulse and Silent BIOS have different performances depending on the average frequency during the fan operation. When averaging at 1450 rpm fans beat, the Sapphire RX 6700 Silent BIOS has the lowest GPU junction temperature. However, when averaging after the job is done to 1100 rpm, it ends up being the same as the OC BIOS.

The thermal chart will also show that both the Power Color Red Dragon card and the reference model have different performances depending on the average frequency during the fan operation. When averaging at 1450 rpm fans beat, the Power Color Red Dragon card's junction temperature was lower than the Sapphire RX 6700 Silent BIOS.

In conclusion, the thermal chart will show that both the Sapphire RX 6700 Pulse and Silent BIOS have different performances depending on the average frequency during the fan operation. The Power Color Red Dragon card performed slightly better in terms of thermal performance when running at 40 dB(A) noise level.

The final part of the article will be on the frequency, which will show that the Power Color Red Dragon card performs slightly better than the Sapphire cards. However, these differences are quite small and may not be noticeable in most games.

In terms of frequency, both the Sapphire RX 6700 Pulse and Silent BIOS have average frequencies around 1400-1500 MHz. The Power Color Red Dragon card's average frequency is higher, with an average value of 1732-1750 MHz. However, these differences are quite small and may not be noticeable in most games.

The article concludes that both the Sapphire RX 6700 Pulse and Silent BIOS cards perform well, but they have some differences in terms of power consumption and thermal performance. The Power Color Red Dragon card performed slightly better than the Sapphire cards in terms of frequency and thermal performance, but these differences are quite small.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enour colors are expensi 700 red dragon was the first non xt 5700 series card that we looked at and we looked at it mostly for thermals and noise just like all the other partner models because the GP performance is mostly covered by the reference card testing today we're looking at the rx 2700 pulse by a sapphire it's not the XT model it looks very similar but it does have some changes to the cooler we're going to be looking at that for thermals acoustics and frequency performance versus primarily the power color red dragon before that this video is brought to you by EB J's a new audio sound card engineered by audionote EVGA a CEO knows high quality audio and has begun bringing sound cards back the new audio sound card is capable of delivering hair-raising audio superior to onboard sound the card includes a line in headphone line out and mic in and a Sony Philips digital interface new audio also leverages the EVGA specie bead design experience has upgradeable op amps and uses a km premium components for its DAC and ADC learn more at the link in the description below here's the pulse it's supposed to be $360 the red dragon card from power colors also supposed to be $360 these are supposed to be $350 so you pay a bit more but you get dual axial cooling which is good and 90s millimeter fans and that brings noise level sound significantly while operating at a lower temperature as well so all positives there the real question is as always is there anything major that a manufacturer has overlooked in the process of putting their card together so we'll look at thermals for that and separately how does it compare relatively to another partner model rather than comparing just to the reference card which is obviously going to lose in these types of benchmarks we need to look at it pressure something else and we have the power color red dragon on the benchmarks for that for the card itself the cooler is extremely similar to the sapphire pulse the XT model we did a teardown of that already it's on the channel if you want to see it but basically there's at least one fewer one last heat pipe on the top here and then there's also a difference in the plates so the cooling plates on the bottom that connect to the base plate or the copper what what of a base plate there is anywhere there's not much of one of these cards but it covers the VRM memory one of the plates there has been removed we might take this part and look at it as well on a teardown if you if anyone cares about it but those are the changes otherwise it looks the same it's got the same ID same fan size same fans same fan curve in terms of the PWM to RPM response it's all the same so it's the heat pipes and the the metal solution that has changed on this but it's also a lower TDP card and then for the power settings is 2v bios which is good dual V bios is always nice to have and one of them is supposed to be silent mode one is RC mode the difference in power consumption for GPU only is about 15 watts we'll look at those numbers so one to the next it's 15 watt difference and other than that let's go through the testing as always you can find a link below for the article with some additional testing information like the bench used but we're just gonna focus on thermals and noise for the most part so let's go through that and then see if it's actually worth buy noise normalize GPU thermals are up first we're starting to fill this chart out now it still needs more cards as they slowly come in for testing but we can at least get started with thermals across the red dragon the Sapphire poles and a.m. the reference card our first chart will show all three devices as normalized to 40 DBA at a 20 inch distance thus allowing us to better understand the effects of cooling efficiency of each cooler when configured to a fixed noise level without doing this you're really just testing the temperature target of each B BIOS which means that whoever has the lowest temperature target and likely the highest loudest rpm would win the chart so to speak well look at that - as it's an important test for the majority of users who do leave their cards Auto controlled but this gives us a better idea as to the best thermal solution from the designs that we have tested so far let's get that chart on the screen at 40 DBA the GPU only thermals for the sapphire rx 5700 nan XT poles have it at about sixty eight point eight degrees Celsius for GPU edge temperature note that unlike our case and cooler reviews this isn't a delta T over ambient value ambient temperature is controlled to 21 degrees Celsius for these tests with any deviation controlled for with modifiers we log ambient temperature every second with a login meter at intake so we can account for ambience wins when necessary or if necessary at sixty eight point eight degrees the pulse has a higher GPU edge temperature and temperature target then the power color red dragon did at the same noise level this positions it warmer in edge temperature and in the more important junction temperature values the junction Delta is about four degrees between the two cards when configured 240 DBA each power color is winning in this comparison although sapphires pulse does hold a significant lead over the reference design clearly with a 20 degree gap at 40 DBA versus Junction on the blower cooler or a similarly high gap versus the edge temperature GT dr6 and vrm thermals are next for this one the pulse and the red dragon are so far below the point of concern on either g6 or VR and moss temperatures that they have become functionally irrelevant we look at these numbers to see if anyone seriously screws up the cooling on non GPU components as seen with the thermal pad choices on some cards we've worked with in both recent and distant past in this instance no one's screwed anything up and both improve over the reference design significantly our concern with reference is that it's getting hot enough that use in a warm case especially where the CPU is also producing a heat load could easily push the GDD our six temperatures north of 100 degrees of printing noise levels down with manual fan rpm this isn't a concern if left auto controlled but it'll be really loud the red dragon and the pulse aren't anywhere close to danger territory here at 68 and 72 degrees Celsius EDD our six the red dragon maintains a technical victory but that's all it is it's a technical win because it's well technically superior but it's also a meaningless Delta between these two the Delta versus reference is meaningful and both hit that mark lower GDD our six temperatures don't give you better clocks so all that's important is that it isn't high enough to go north of 100 degrees when used in a warm case with a warm room ambient temperature and vrm MOSFET temperatures here are so low that it's a completely irrelevant thing to look at other than just making sure they didn't mess it up these cards aren't pushing enough power to drive them out so it's that hard and getting cooling solutions further this the pulse holds another technical victory in this instance although nearly air but it's not meaningful so it's one point for each of them in this one the fan response will help us better understand the differences between HP BIOS on the card the default position is the higher power target we bio stored the PCIe cables whereas the position toward the back of the card is the lower power target configuration in this test we see that the fan rpm on each is not any different up until the end the pulse ends up plotting at about 1450 rpm for HP bios option when left to self-regulate vs power n GPU thermal targets fan curves will adjust based on GPU temperature so we'd like to run some tests without any externally imposed controls to better understand stock behavior with both fan RPMs at the same speed one could postulate that GPU temperature is the same in this instance though we see that it's not the higher power v bios spots at about 70 degrees Celsius on average while these secondary bios runs at about 4 to 5 degrees cooler throughout the test up until the end or the fan RPM spontaneously dropped off upon further inspection it looks like the temperature was sitting just below the threshold for the next fan speed hike so maybe that caused the rpm to drop since it wasn't passed the next temperature threshold it could also be and likely is a bug relating to the drivers and how they're interacting with the card and the V bios we're not quite sure we've seen behavior like this on the power cutter card as well talked about in the previous review but in this instance it fell from 1450 rpm to about 1100 rpm towards the end of the task this would make sense for a silent bios anyway the last part the 1100 rpm but it did not seem to apply until late in the load cycle it also makes sense that thermals are set to the same 70 degree target and so a lower power target and lower rpm target would combine to allow the same temperatures but lower noise ergo silent naming for the V bios to research this further we ran another test pass with silent and logged it again just to see if it was a fluke behavior was similar at first you can see the fan ramps to 1450 RPM initially but it fell to about 1000 rpm after that the dips to zero are reporting errors and AMD's API and should be ignored the real takeaway is that the retest shows it is once again closer to 1000 rpm but it also repeats the boosted fan at the we observed similar behavior with power colors card when we reviewed that so we're not sure if this is an AMD issue or a V bios issue but we're leaning toward V bios since it's something that power color thought they could resolve on at least their card the fan is ramping too aggressively in the beginning of the workload here GPU temperature is close to the OC bios results as expected because the fan speeds lower but this is probably how silent is supposed to behave it just doesn't seem that consistent at least right now to explain why the temperature was lower at the same rpm we can look at this plot of GPUs e-logs power readings we wouldn't rely on this reading for card to card power consumption as we can get more accurate numbers with our inner poser setup critically this is what the GPS are looking at when running off of their own power limits the OC v bios is allowed to draw one sixty five watts for the GPU only power ignoring GG dr6 power and vrm efficiency losses while the silent v bios drops down to 150 watts this 15 watt gap is similar to the power color cards configuration although the power color guard runs 170 watts for OC and 155 for silent this thermal chart will give the full sweep of auto settings for each V BIOS on each of the two cards plus some reference 5700 numbers and 40 DBA numbers scoring by junction temperature first the sapphire rx 6700 pulse and silent BIOS has the lowest GPU junction temperature but only when we average during the 1450 rpm fans beat if averaging after the job to 1100 rpm it ends up the same as the OC BIOS thermals also note that the silent bios is running at the lowest power target between all four permutations of the AI v partner cards so it makes sense that it's the coolest Junction is at 73 for this with GPU edge at sixty four point five the power color red dragon at forty DBA is next followed by the pulse at 40 DBA but we already talked about those results the pulse with OC bios follows at 79 degrees Junction and sixty eight point seven degrees edge temperature this is next followed by the red dragon with its silently BIOS which lowers power target to 155 watts then the red dragon with OC bios at eighty five point four Junction that is and a 170 watt v bios allowance and after all these numbers it's just the reference card the G GD r6 and vrm thermals are next for steady state averages in this one the only change to the stack is the red dragon at 40 DBA and the pulse with a silent V bios everything else stays in its original hierarchy no one has exceptionally bad thermals on this chart although reference is in bad territory with it's 88 degrees G DDR six results and this will become worse again in a case or a warmer ambient environment the rest though is all sort of irrelevant frequency over time will be our last set of charts first we're looking at just the sapphire pulse and it's silent versus our CV bios options with the EOC V bios of frequency averages around 1705 megahertz flat whereas the silent V bios runs at about 1670 megahertz average sometimes hitting 1680 the next frequency plot will show comparisons to the reference card and the power color red dragon 5700 card the sapphire pulse ocv bios remains where it was a moment ago as it's the same data but the power color red dragon ends up about 1732 1750 megahertz which puts it about thirty to forty five megahertz higher on average while the RFC 711 that's it for the $360 sapphire 5700 pulse very straightforward review not that different from what we saw with the XT in terms of construction so pretty easy to walk through thermally and acoustically it's doing significantly better than the reference model for versus the the power color card it's a bit of a harder battle for sapphire so power color is in the lead there for thermals on the power color card it has a higher frequency a bit as well very very slightly higher performance in games as a result we're talking like 1% maybe 1.5 so the differences are really just going to come down to price and availability in your region by whichever ones available there's this isn't bad the power color one's not bad they are both performing well below the thermal requirements of everything on the card you have plenty of room to quiet down the fans if you wanted to and still have good thermals so we're fine with both of these power color has a technical victory here for thermals especially when noise normalized when they're all at 40 DBA but that doesn't mean sapphire is bad it just means that's fires a couple degrees behind so in the comparative power color winds in terms of should you buy it it's completely fine if you prefer the look or you can find stock and you can't of the other card in your region then there's no problem with buying this one so pretty simple stuff and there's nothing wrong with it and that's a positive review from us so thank you for watching subscribe for more he got his throat on camera sexist net the hell was hot directly like by walked by in one of these shirts the GP artifact in shirt and the mod mats or you here to patreon.com/scishow cameras axis I'll see you all next timeour colors are expensi 700 red dragon was the first non xt 5700 series card that we looked at and we looked at it mostly for thermals and noise just like all the other partner models because the GP performance is mostly covered by the reference card testing today we're looking at the rx 2700 pulse by a sapphire it's not the XT model it looks very similar but it does have some changes to the cooler we're going to be looking at that for thermals acoustics and frequency performance versus primarily the power color red dragon before that this video is brought to you by EB J's a new audio sound card engineered by audionote EVGA a CEO knows high quality audio and has begun bringing sound cards back the new audio sound card is capable of delivering hair-raising audio superior to onboard sound the card includes a line in headphone line out and mic in and a Sony Philips digital interface new audio also leverages the EVGA specie bead design experience has upgradeable op amps and uses a km premium components for its DAC and ADC learn more at the link in the description below here's the pulse it's supposed to be $360 the red dragon card from power colors also supposed to be $360 these are supposed to be $350 so you pay a bit more but you get dual axial cooling which is good and 90s millimeter fans and that brings noise level sound significantly while operating at a lower temperature as well so all positives there the real question is as always is there anything major that a manufacturer has overlooked in the process of putting their card together so we'll look at thermals for that and separately how does it compare relatively to another partner model rather than comparing just to the reference card which is obviously going to lose in these types of benchmarks we need to look at it pressure something else and we have the power color red dragon on the benchmarks for that for the card itself the cooler is extremely similar to the sapphire pulse the XT model we did a teardown of that already it's on the channel if you want to see it but basically there's at least one fewer one last heat pipe on the top here and then there's also a difference in the plates so the cooling plates on the bottom that connect to the base plate or the copper what what of a base plate there is anywhere there's not much of one of these cards but it covers the VRM memory one of the plates there has been removed we might take this part and look at it as well on a teardown if you if anyone cares about it but those are the changes otherwise it looks the same it's got the same ID same fan size same fans same fan curve in terms of the PWM to RPM response it's all the same so it's the heat pipes and the the metal solution that has changed on this but it's also a lower TDP card and then for the power settings is 2v bios which is good dual V bios is always nice to have and one of them is supposed to be silent mode one is RC mode the difference in power consumption for GPU only is about 15 watts we'll look at those numbers so one to the next it's 15 watt difference and other than that let's go through the testing as always you can find a link below for the article with some additional testing information like the bench used but we're just gonna focus on thermals and noise for the most part so let's go through that and then see if it's actually worth buy noise normalize GPU thermals are up first we're starting to fill this chart out now it still needs more cards as they slowly come in for testing but we can at least get started with thermals across the red dragon the Sapphire poles and a.m. the reference card our first chart will show all three devices as normalized to 40 DBA at a 20 inch distance thus allowing us to better understand the effects of cooling efficiency of each cooler when configured to a fixed noise level without doing this you're really just testing the temperature target of each B BIOS which means that whoever has the lowest temperature target and likely the highest loudest rpm would win the chart so to speak well look at that - as it's an important test for the majority of users who do leave their cards Auto controlled but this gives us a better idea as to the best thermal solution from the designs that we have tested so far let's get that chart on the screen at 40 DBA the GPU only thermals for the sapphire rx 5700 nan XT poles have it at about sixty eight point eight degrees Celsius for GPU edge temperature note that unlike our case and cooler reviews this isn't a delta T over ambient value ambient temperature is controlled to 21 degrees Celsius for these tests with any deviation controlled for with modifiers we log ambient temperature every second with a login meter at intake so we can account for ambience wins when necessary or if necessary at sixty eight point eight degrees the pulse has a higher GPU edge temperature and temperature target then the power color red dragon did at the same noise level this positions it warmer in edge temperature and in the more important junction temperature values the junction Delta is about four degrees between the two cards when configured 240 DBA each power color is winning in this comparison although sapphires pulse does hold a significant lead over the reference design clearly with a 20 degree gap at 40 DBA versus Junction on the blower cooler or a similarly high gap versus the edge temperature GT dr6 and vrm thermals are next for this one the pulse and the red dragon are so far below the point of concern on either g6 or VR and moss temperatures that they have become functionally irrelevant we look at these numbers to see if anyone seriously screws up the cooling on non GPU components as seen with the thermal pad choices on some cards we've worked with in both recent and distant past in this instance no one's screwed anything up and both improve over the reference design significantly our concern with reference is that it's getting hot enough that use in a warm case especially where the CPU is also producing a heat load could easily push the GDD our six temperatures north of 100 degrees of printing noise levels down with manual fan rpm this isn't a concern if left auto controlled but it'll be really loud the red dragon and the pulse aren't anywhere close to danger territory here at 68 and 72 degrees Celsius EDD our six the red dragon maintains a technical victory but that's all it is it's a technical win because it's well technically superior but it's also a meaningless Delta between these two the Delta versus reference is meaningful and both hit that mark lower GDD our six temperatures don't give you better clocks so all that's important is that it isn't high enough to go north of 100 degrees when used in a warm case with a warm room ambient temperature and vrm MOSFET temperatures here are so low that it's a completely irrelevant thing to look at other than just making sure they didn't mess it up these cards aren't pushing enough power to drive them out so it's that hard and getting cooling solutions further this the pulse holds another technical victory in this instance although nearly air but it's not meaningful so it's one point for each of them in this one the fan response will help us better understand the differences between HP BIOS on the card the default position is the higher power target we bio stored the PCIe cables whereas the position toward the back of the card is the lower power target configuration in this test we see that the fan rpm on each is not any different up until the end the pulse ends up plotting at about 1450 rpm for HP bios option when left to self-regulate vs power n GPU thermal targets fan curves will adjust based on GPU temperature so we'd like to run some tests without any externally imposed controls to better understand stock behavior with both fan RPMs at the same speed one could postulate that GPU temperature is the same in this instance though we see that it's not the higher power v bios spots at about 70 degrees Celsius on average while these secondary bios runs at about 4 to 5 degrees cooler throughout the test up until the end or the fan RPM spontaneously dropped off upon further inspection it looks like the temperature was sitting just below the threshold for the next fan speed hike so maybe that caused the rpm to drop since it wasn't passed the next temperature threshold it could also be and likely is a bug relating to the drivers and how they're interacting with the card and the V bios we're not quite sure we've seen behavior like this on the power cutter card as well talked about in the previous review but in this instance it fell from 1450 rpm to about 1100 rpm towards the end of the task this would make sense for a silent bios anyway the last part the 1100 rpm but it did not seem to apply until late in the load cycle it also makes sense that thermals are set to the same 70 degree target and so a lower power target and lower rpm target would combine to allow the same temperatures but lower noise ergo silent naming for the V bios to research this further we ran another test pass with silent and logged it again just to see if it was a fluke behavior was similar at first you can see the fan ramps to 1450 RPM initially but it fell to about 1000 rpm after that the dips to zero are reporting errors and AMD's API and should be ignored the real takeaway is that the retest shows it is once again closer to 1000 rpm but it also repeats the boosted fan at the we observed similar behavior with power colors card when we reviewed that so we're not sure if this is an AMD issue or a V bios issue but we're leaning toward V bios since it's something that power color thought they could resolve on at least their card the fan is ramping too aggressively in the beginning of the workload here GPU temperature is close to the OC bios results as expected because the fan speeds lower but this is probably how silent is supposed to behave it just doesn't seem that consistent at least right now to explain why the temperature was lower at the same rpm we can look at this plot of GPUs e-logs power readings we wouldn't rely on this reading for card to card power consumption as we can get more accurate numbers with our inner poser setup critically this is what the GPS are looking at when running off of their own power limits the OC v bios is allowed to draw one sixty five watts for the GPU only power ignoring GG dr6 power and vrm efficiency losses while the silent v bios drops down to 150 watts this 15 watt gap is similar to the power color cards configuration although the power color guard runs 170 watts for OC and 155 for silent this thermal chart will give the full sweep of auto settings for each V BIOS on each of the two cards plus some reference 5700 numbers and 40 DBA numbers scoring by junction temperature first the sapphire rx 6700 pulse and silent BIOS has the lowest GPU junction temperature but only when we average during the 1450 rpm fans beat if averaging after the job to 1100 rpm it ends up the same as the OC BIOS thermals also note that the silent bios is running at the lowest power target between all four permutations of the AI v partner cards so it makes sense that it's the coolest Junction is at 73 for this with GPU edge at sixty four point five the power color red dragon at forty DBA is next followed by the pulse at 40 DBA but we already talked about those results the pulse with OC bios follows at 79 degrees Junction and sixty eight point seven degrees edge temperature this is next followed by the red dragon with its silently BIOS which lowers power target to 155 watts then the red dragon with OC bios at eighty five point four Junction that is and a 170 watt v bios allowance and after all these numbers it's just the reference card the G GD r6 and vrm thermals are next for steady state averages in this one the only change to the stack is the red dragon at 40 DBA and the pulse with a silent V bios everything else stays in its original hierarchy no one has exceptionally bad thermals on this chart although reference is in bad territory with it's 88 degrees G DDR six results and this will become worse again in a case or a warmer ambient environment the rest though is all sort of irrelevant frequency over time will be our last set of charts first we're looking at just the sapphire pulse and it's silent versus our CV bios options with the EOC V bios of frequency averages around 1705 megahertz flat whereas the silent V bios runs at about 1670 megahertz average sometimes hitting 1680 the next frequency plot will show comparisons to the reference card and the power color red dragon 5700 card the sapphire pulse ocv bios remains where it was a moment ago as it's the same data but the power color red dragon ends up about 1732 1750 megahertz which puts it about thirty to forty five megahertz higher on average while the RFC 711 that's it for the $360 sapphire 5700 pulse very straightforward review not that different from what we saw with the XT in terms of construction so pretty easy to walk through thermally and acoustically it's doing significantly better than the reference model for versus the the power color card it's a bit of a harder battle for sapphire so power color is in the lead there for thermals on the power color card it has a higher frequency a bit as well very very slightly higher performance in games as a result we're talking like 1% maybe 1.5 so the differences are really just going to come down to price and availability in your region by whichever ones available there's this isn't bad the power color one's not bad they are both performing well below the thermal requirements of everything on the card you have plenty of room to quiet down the fans if you wanted to and still have good thermals so we're fine with both of these power color has a technical victory here for thermals especially when noise normalized when they're all at 40 DBA but that doesn't mean sapphire is bad it just means that's fires a couple degrees behind so in the comparative power color winds in terms of should you buy it it's completely fine if you prefer the look or you can find stock and you can't of the other card in your region then there's no problem with buying this one so pretty simple stuff and there's nothing wrong with it and that's a positive review from us so thank you for watching subscribe for more he got his throat on camera sexist net the hell was hot directly like by walked by in one of these shirts the GP artifact in shirt and the mod mats or you here to patreon.com/scishow cameras axis I'll see you all next time\n"