DON'T Buy Ryzen 9000 or Intel Core Ultra! ❌ Here's What to Buy Instead...

The CPU Market: A Mixed Bag of Opportunities and Challenges

AMD's dominance in the gaming market is evident, with their Ryzen 7 CPUs offering excellent performance at competitive prices. In contrast, Intel's offerings on the higher end of the spectrum have been less impressive, with the Core Ultra 9 not quite matching AMD's performance in terms of multi-threaded workloads.

The Ryzen 5 9000 series has proven to be a popular choice for gaming, and their prices have fallen significantly over time. This has made them an attractive option for gamers who want high-performance CPUs without breaking the bank. However, when it comes to higher-end models like the Ryzen 7 9000, AMD's pricing strategy has been less aggressive, with the latest generation of Ryzen 7 chips being more expensive than their predecessors.

One area where Intel has struggled is in the gaming market, particularly at the high end. The Core Ultra 9 is a decent CPU for multi-threaded workloads, but it falls short when compared to AMD's offerings in terms of raw performance. In fact, the Ryzen 7 9000 series outperforms the Core Ultra 9 in most gaming scenarios.

The lack of good gaming CPUs on the market has led to a situation where popular chips like the Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 7 5700X are being priced at a premium due to high demand. This is particularly evident in countries like the US, where prices for these CPUs can be significantly higher than in other parts of the world.

However, with AMD expected to release new X3D chips soon, the market is likely to undergo a significant shift. The X3D lineup has been instrumental in AMD's success in the gaming market, and their latest generation of X3D CPUs promises even better performance at lower prices. If AMD can manage to bring these new CPUs to market without disrupting the balance between demand and supply, it could have a significant impact on the market.

In terms of recommendations for gamers, there are a few options available. For those looking for a more affordable option, the Ryzen 5 7600 or Ryzen 7 5700X are excellent choices. However, if you're willing to spend a bit more and want even better performance, the Ryzen 7 7800X is an excellent option.

For those in the market for a high-end multicore CPU, Intel's Core Ultra 9 may be worth considering. While it doesn't quite match AMD's offerings in terms of raw performance, it does offer some benefits in certain workloads. Additionally, the Core Ultra 5, which has been criticized for its poor performance compared to AMD's Ryzen 9 7900X and Ryzen 7 7800X, actually offers better cost per performance in certain scenarios.

The CPU market is currently a bit disjointed, with various chips offering unique strengths and weaknesses. However, with the expected release of new X3D CPUs from AMD and continued innovation from Intel, there are opportunities for gamers to find high-performance CPUs at competitive prices. Whether it's AMD or Intel, good value deals on motherboards can make all the difference in finding a great CPU that meets your needs.

The high-end multicore CPU market is another area where Intel has had some success, particularly with their Core Ultra 9. While they may not have matched AMD's performance in terms of raw multi-threaded workloads, they have offered better cost per frame in certain scenarios. In fact, the Core Ultra 9 actually outperforms AMD's offerings in many high-end multicore workloads.

However, when it comes to lower-end multicore CPUs, AMD has struggled to match Intel's performance. The Ryzen 7 7800X and Ryzen 9 7900X are both excellent options for those looking for high-performance multicore CPUs, but their prices have been a bit higher than expected. Additionally, the Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 5 5600X offer good value in certain scenarios, but may not be as competitive when it comes to raw multi-threaded performance.

Ultimately, the CPU market is complex and multifaceted, with various chips offering unique strengths and weaknesses. Whether you're a gamer or a content creator, there are opportunities for finding high-performance CPUs at competitive prices. By staying informed about the latest developments in the CPU market and considering your specific needs, you can find the perfect chip to meet your requirements.

The X3D lineup has been instrumental in AMD's success in the gaming market, but their pricing strategy has been less aggressive than expected. The Ryzen 5 9000 series offers excellent performance at competitive prices, while higher-end models like the Ryzen 7 9000 have been more expensive. However, with the expected release of new X3D chips soon, it's likely that AMD will adjust their pricing strategy to make these chips more competitive.

The Core Ultra 9 from Intel is a decent CPU for multi-threaded workloads, but it falls short when compared to AMD's offerings in terms of raw performance. However, it does offer some benefits in certain scenarios, such as better cost per frame in high-end multicore workloads. Additionally, the Core Ultra 5 offers better cost per performance in certain scenarios, making it a good option for those looking for a high-performance CPU without breaking the bank.

Overall, the CPU market is complex and multifaceted, with various chips offering unique strengths and weaknesses. Whether you're a gamer or a content creator, there are opportunities for finding high-performance CPUs at competitive prices. By staying informed about the latest developments in the CPU market and considering your specific needs, you can find the perfect chip to meet your requirements.

The Ryzen 5 9000 series is an excellent option for gamers who want high-performance CPUs without breaking the bank. Their prices have fallen significantly over time, making them a competitive choice in the gaming market. However, when it comes to higher-end models like the Ryzen 7 9000, AMD's pricing strategy has been less aggressive than expected.

Ultimately, the choice between AMD and Intel depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you're a gamer who wants raw performance, AMD's offerings may be the way to go. However, if you're looking for better cost per frame in certain scenarios or more competitive pricing, Intel may be worth considering.

In contrast, AMD's Ryzen 7 7800X and Ryzen 9 7900X offer excellent performance for gaming and content creation. However, their prices have been a bit higher than expected, which may limit their appeal to some users.

However, with the expected release of new X3D chips soon, it's likely that AMD will adjust their pricing strategy to make these chips more competitive. This could potentially disrupt the balance between demand and supply, leading to lower prices for these CPUs.

For those in the market for a high-end multicore CPU, Intel's Core Ultra 9 may be worth considering. While it doesn't quite match AMD's offerings in terms of raw performance, it does offer some benefits in certain workloads. Additionally, the Core Ultra 5 offers better cost per performance in certain scenarios, making it a good option for those looking for a high-performance CPU without breaking the bank.

Overall, the choice between AMD and Intel depends on your specific needs and priorities. If you're a gamer who wants raw performance, AMD's offerings may be the way to go. However, if you're looking for better cost per frame in certain scenarios or more competitive pricing, Intel may be worth considering.

However, when it comes to higher-end models like the Ryzen 7 9000, AMD's pricing strategy has been less aggressive than expected. This could potentially disrupt the balance between demand and supply, leading to lower prices for these CPUs.

In contrast, Intel's Core Ultra 9 offers some benefits in certain workloads, such as better cost per frame in high-end multicore workloads. Additionally, the Core Ultra 5 offers better cost per performance in certain scenarios, making it a good option for those looking for a high-performance CPU without breaking the bank.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enthe recent Intel Core Ultra and ryzen 9000 CPU launches have been anything from underwhelming to a complete unmitigated disaster for AMD and Intel two Flagship CPU lineups that we hoped would provide more performance than the previous generation chips that have failed to deliver on multiple counts but with the CPU Market in complete freefall what should you actually buy and where do the latest AMD and Intel CPU launches actually leave us well in this video I'll Be talking about what went wrong for AMD and Intel but more importantly how you can make sure that doesn't affect your next system and what you should actually buy in what is a really confusing Market let's do this corsair's latest midtower PC case is here the Corsair 3500x has arrived boasting support for most large graphics cards 360 mil aios and even e8x motherboards reverse cable motherboard compatibility also allows you to use the latest designs in your build while p pamic glass at the front and side shows off your system in all of its Glory available in black white RGB and IQ link derivatives you can check it out at the first links in the description below now let's start with cor Ultra because that's going to be the most fresh in people's mind now cor Ultra as a lineup of CPUs isn't actually fundamentally flawed it's not like the CPUs have big issues with excessive voltages huge heat output or plane instability they're just no better really than the 14th gen chips that Intel hopes they'll replace now this is a brand new architecture which is why we're all hoping for so much more and while Intel have fixed the power consumption and heat output wo that really hurt 14th and to an extent 13th gen that's about it now as far as benchmarks go you'll have seen in our recent launch build where we covered all of these CPUs in detail check out in the cards now that performance in some instances is actually worse let alone on par with the previous gen 14th and even 13th gen CPUs and the issue here that Intel has got is compounded over multiple lineups you see 14th gen wasn't really that much quicker than 13th gen in a number of the tests that we and many other the people have carried out that meant that the jump we were hoping from for 15th gen almost needed to compensate for what 14th gen should have been now it's great that Intel have got the architecture more right this time around heat and power being the main concerns but again as I said in the summary of our core Ultra launch build a lot of Gamers frankly don't care about power consumption and as long as it's not over heating with a decent cooler it's not really a concern for the vast majority of people now ryzen 9000 was slightly different in that it wasn't a brand new architecture and that instead it built on what was an incredibly successful lineup of CPUs from AMD on ryzen 7000 now I'd go far to say the Intel's core Ultra launch actually made AMD ryzen 9000 look a little bit better and I think if AMD had held off and launched the CPUs later they might have had a more positive reception now the big problem for me with ryzen 9000 isn't actually performing perance now yes the performance uplift isn't very big from 9,000 to 7,000 but there is at least some performance uplift unlike with Intel my problem with ryzen 9000 is actually the price the issue that AMD always have when they release a new lineup of CPUs is that they're too expensive and they do this with gpus too AMD if you're watching why this is the bit I don't get with AMD right you look at every single GPU in the mid-range of the market the 7700 the 7800 and the 7900 XTS and GR all three right now represent exceptional value for money our cost per frame analysis of GPU testing in a range of titles puts these cards squarely at the bottom of the graph aka the cheapest on a per frame basis now that sounds great but when those cards launched they were just far more expensive than they were now which made the cost per frame analysis when they were originally reviewed look pretty terrible and this is what AMD did with ryzen 70002 they launched the ryzen 5 7600 X the best part of $300 it was terrible value for money and nobody bought one what can you buy one for now about $229 and we're already seeing this happen with the ryzen 5 9600 x a chip that is a bit better than the 7600 X but not by a great deal what did that launch for about $300 what can you buy one for now $250 how long's it been since they launched what 4 weeks if that and this is the bit with AMD that perplexes me I just don't quite understand why AMD fall into this trap of overpricing CPUs in the in the first place for really very little gain especially when the resulting reviews then say well it's okay but it's too expensive and what's really quite a shame about both the recent AMD and Intel launches is that some of the architectural issues we've seen over the last few years have been fixed let's face it ryzen now is in a much better place than it was 18 months ago when ryzen 7000 first launched the motherboards cost a fortune the ddr5 memory was expensive and the latencies were slow and speeds weren't great either now ddr5 is cheaper than ever motherboards are cheaper than ever and the platform costs associated with these CPUs are you guessed it cheaper than ever so that's ryzen 9000 and that's Intel's core Ultra but what should you actually buy now to answer this question we've taken all of our benchmarking data in a range of synthetic and gaming scenarios and combined it with the pricing right now of these chips we've used new EG in the states as a representative idea and this pricing actually paints a very different picture to what we would have seen just a few weeks ago when ryzen 9000 first launched now as far as the cheapest viable gaming CPU that I would recommend for most builds I would discount Intel's cor I3 1400f on the basis it's only got four cores six cores really is what you want for gaming right now and actually look at the ryzen 7000 lineup the ryzen 7500f is sort of an AliExpress CPU that's going to provide good performance at an affordable $150 price point but if you want a mainstream CPU you can buy on Amazon or New Egg Intel's cor I 5 14400 F actually comes in at a surprising $176 now this is around $2 cheaper than amd's ryzen 57600 non X and arguably you'll be able to get the motherboards and stuff a little bit cheaper as those boards are now technically end of life and obviously don't support the new core Ultra CPUs the advantage to spending another $20 on the 7600 non X even if it doesn't really represent value for money compared to the I5 chip is that of course you can use a mod b650 potentially b850 if that lands in the New Year chipset motherboard and actually get better upgrade paths moving into 2025 and Beyond but where things get really interesting is if you step up and look at the ryzen 57600 X why would you buy the new ryzen 59600 X for $300 when you can buy the 7600 X for around $229 but the 9600 X has already falling in price which illustrates the point I made earlier and that is that w ryzen doesn't hold its price very well at all and what could bring ryzen 9,000 CPUs back into contention is the price drops we've all come to expect from AMD now you could argue this is also just AMD being punished for overpricing CPUs in the first place and responding to weak sales demand which is probably true but it actually underpins the fact further that you can't really trust the initial Ry of 9000 reviews that were based on the price and AMD gave out because they will not stick to it and as we start to move up the lineup a little bit more you'll see AMD win out again and again for gaming you see the 14600 K from Intel provides good performance but is nearly as expensive as amd's ryzen 7 CPUs which are arguably a better buy now we haven't seen the same aggressive price drops on ryzen 7 9000 that we have on ryzen 5 9000 but if that pattern is ended into go by we should expect that to broadly follow in the not too distant future the lack of good gaming CPUs on the higher end of the spectrum also leads to problems with popular chips like this the 7800 x3d and now seems like a good point to talk about the x3d lineup of CPUs now there's no doubt about the fact that this is pretty much the fastest gaming CPU on the market I mean look at some of our testing which just shows how good this chip is especially for those lower resolutions where you're more CPU bound now the 7800x 3D at times has gone to well under $400 I've seen this float around the 350 360 Mark previously but now that is not the case not only over in the US but over here in the UK too you've got a hard time finding this for anywhere near that price point in fact our current data suggests that the 7800 x3d actually comes in at a staggering $470 that pricing exists because there are no other good gaming CPUs out there right now I mean heck the core Ultra 9 is okay when it comes to multi-threaded Performance but it's not going to compete against the 7800 x3d and certainly not at their respective MSRP price points now of course we are expecting AMD to bring out newer x3d CPUs pretty imminently at least that's what the rumor milk seems to suggest and that should help ease the demand and supply issues on the 7800 x3d and it other x3d Bigger Brothers now what that means really is that for gaming there's a couple of easy recommendations on the lower end you'll want to go for the ryzen 5 7600 either the x or the nonex version while keeping your eye on the 9600 X to see if this Falls further if this gets to around the 230 235 Mark I think it could be a very compelling CPU if you want a little bit more Firepower yes you may want to consider a ryzen 7 chip but you'd be better with a 7800 x3d all waiting for the new x3d chips and this to fall in price I'm not suggesting that this chip at around $500 is a particularly good bik so that's gaming but what about the high-end multicore side is this where Intel regain a little bit of composure and the answer is actually yes because if you take the pricing data we've gathered on all these CPUs right now and couple up with the cinebench multi-course scores of all of these chips you actually see that Intel has the lowest cost per frame and not just on one or two CPUs but pretty much the whole range while our cinebench data and tests in applications like d vinu resolve don't show the core Ultra 9 to be beating out the 14900 K in every scenario it does still beat out all but one of amd's options on the higher end for multicore workloads in to they're not completely dead and buried yes it's disappointing to see no more performance over 13 and 14th gen and I'm not saying that you should buy the core Ultra 9 necessarily but don't discount Intel completely I feel like there's a little bit of a sentiment right now that Intel forgot how to make CPUs with 13th and 14th gen and then completely dropped the ball with core Ultra but the fact of the matter is when it comes to high multicore workloads AMD do suffer just a little bit in fact the 7800x 3D at its current pricing but perhaps more fairly the 79 50x 3D which is price G to a much lower extent actually has the highest cost per thousand points in cinebench R23 and chips like the ryzen 9 7900 X aren't much better in fact Intel's core Ultra 5 which is just not that great actually beats out pretty much all of AMD CPUs on a cost per performance basis in multicore tasks like cine bench ultimately the CPU Market is a little bit disjointed right now but good value deals on motherboards especially whether you go lash gen or even AMD whose current gen platform costs have fallen sharply does at least give some glimmer of hope hopefully AMD can save the market with x3d as Intel and AMD themselves have left the door open with ryzen 9000 and Intel Core Ultrathe recent Intel Core Ultra and ryzen 9000 CPU launches have been anything from underwhelming to a complete unmitigated disaster for AMD and Intel two Flagship CPU lineups that we hoped would provide more performance than the previous generation chips that have failed to deliver on multiple counts but with the CPU Market in complete freefall what should you actually buy and where do the latest AMD and Intel CPU launches actually leave us well in this video I'll Be talking about what went wrong for AMD and Intel but more importantly how you can make sure that doesn't affect your next system and what you should actually buy in what is a really confusing Market let's do this corsair's latest midtower PC case is here the Corsair 3500x has arrived boasting support for most large graphics cards 360 mil aios and even e8x motherboards reverse cable motherboard compatibility also allows you to use the latest designs in your build while p pamic glass at the front and side shows off your system in all of its Glory available in black white RGB and IQ link derivatives you can check it out at the first links in the description below now let's start with cor Ultra because that's going to be the most fresh in people's mind now cor Ultra as a lineup of CPUs isn't actually fundamentally flawed it's not like the CPUs have big issues with excessive voltages huge heat output or plane instability they're just no better really than the 14th gen chips that Intel hopes they'll replace now this is a brand new architecture which is why we're all hoping for so much more and while Intel have fixed the power consumption and heat output wo that really hurt 14th and to an extent 13th gen that's about it now as far as benchmarks go you'll have seen in our recent launch build where we covered all of these CPUs in detail check out in the cards now that performance in some instances is actually worse let alone on par with the previous gen 14th and even 13th gen CPUs and the issue here that Intel has got is compounded over multiple lineups you see 14th gen wasn't really that much quicker than 13th gen in a number of the tests that we and many other the people have carried out that meant that the jump we were hoping from for 15th gen almost needed to compensate for what 14th gen should have been now it's great that Intel have got the architecture more right this time around heat and power being the main concerns but again as I said in the summary of our core Ultra launch build a lot of Gamers frankly don't care about power consumption and as long as it's not over heating with a decent cooler it's not really a concern for the vast majority of people now ryzen 9000 was slightly different in that it wasn't a brand new architecture and that instead it built on what was an incredibly successful lineup of CPUs from AMD on ryzen 7000 now I'd go far to say the Intel's core Ultra launch actually made AMD ryzen 9000 look a little bit better and I think if AMD had held off and launched the CPUs later they might have had a more positive reception now the big problem for me with ryzen 9000 isn't actually performing perance now yes the performance uplift isn't very big from 9,000 to 7,000 but there is at least some performance uplift unlike with Intel my problem with ryzen 9000 is actually the price the issue that AMD always have when they release a new lineup of CPUs is that they're too expensive and they do this with gpus too AMD if you're watching why this is the bit I don't get with AMD right you look at every single GPU in the mid-range of the market the 7700 the 7800 and the 7900 XTS and GR all three right now represent exceptional value for money our cost per frame analysis of GPU testing in a range of titles puts these cards squarely at the bottom of the graph aka the cheapest on a per frame basis now that sounds great but when those cards launched they were just far more expensive than they were now which made the cost per frame analysis when they were originally reviewed look pretty terrible and this is what AMD did with ryzen 70002 they launched the ryzen 5 7600 X the best part of $300 it was terrible value for money and nobody bought one what can you buy one for now about $229 and we're already seeing this happen with the ryzen 5 9600 x a chip that is a bit better than the 7600 X but not by a great deal what did that launch for about $300 what can you buy one for now $250 how long's it been since they launched what 4 weeks if that and this is the bit with AMD that perplexes me I just don't quite understand why AMD fall into this trap of overpricing CPUs in the in the first place for really very little gain especially when the resulting reviews then say well it's okay but it's too expensive and what's really quite a shame about both the recent AMD and Intel launches is that some of the architectural issues we've seen over the last few years have been fixed let's face it ryzen now is in a much better place than it was 18 months ago when ryzen 7000 first launched the motherboards cost a fortune the ddr5 memory was expensive and the latencies were slow and speeds weren't great either now ddr5 is cheaper than ever motherboards are cheaper than ever and the platform costs associated with these CPUs are you guessed it cheaper than ever so that's ryzen 9000 and that's Intel's core Ultra but what should you actually buy now to answer this question we've taken all of our benchmarking data in a range of synthetic and gaming scenarios and combined it with the pricing right now of these chips we've used new EG in the states as a representative idea and this pricing actually paints a very different picture to what we would have seen just a few weeks ago when ryzen 9000 first launched now as far as the cheapest viable gaming CPU that I would recommend for most builds I would discount Intel's cor I3 1400f on the basis it's only got four cores six cores really is what you want for gaming right now and actually look at the ryzen 7000 lineup the ryzen 7500f is sort of an AliExpress CPU that's going to provide good performance at an affordable $150 price point but if you want a mainstream CPU you can buy on Amazon or New Egg Intel's cor I 5 14400 F actually comes in at a surprising $176 now this is around $2 cheaper than amd's ryzen 57600 non X and arguably you'll be able to get the motherboards and stuff a little bit cheaper as those boards are now technically end of life and obviously don't support the new core Ultra CPUs the advantage to spending another $20 on the 7600 non X even if it doesn't really represent value for money compared to the I5 chip is that of course you can use a mod b650 potentially b850 if that lands in the New Year chipset motherboard and actually get better upgrade paths moving into 2025 and Beyond but where things get really interesting is if you step up and look at the ryzen 57600 X why would you buy the new ryzen 59600 X for $300 when you can buy the 7600 X for around $229 but the 9600 X has already falling in price which illustrates the point I made earlier and that is that w ryzen doesn't hold its price very well at all and what could bring ryzen 9,000 CPUs back into contention is the price drops we've all come to expect from AMD now you could argue this is also just AMD being punished for overpricing CPUs in the first place and responding to weak sales demand which is probably true but it actually underpins the fact further that you can't really trust the initial Ry of 9000 reviews that were based on the price and AMD gave out because they will not stick to it and as we start to move up the lineup a little bit more you'll see AMD win out again and again for gaming you see the 14600 K from Intel provides good performance but is nearly as expensive as amd's ryzen 7 CPUs which are arguably a better buy now we haven't seen the same aggressive price drops on ryzen 7 9000 that we have on ryzen 5 9000 but if that pattern is ended into go by we should expect that to broadly follow in the not too distant future the lack of good gaming CPUs on the higher end of the spectrum also leads to problems with popular chips like this the 7800 x3d and now seems like a good point to talk about the x3d lineup of CPUs now there's no doubt about the fact that this is pretty much the fastest gaming CPU on the market I mean look at some of our testing which just shows how good this chip is especially for those lower resolutions where you're more CPU bound now the 7800x 3D at times has gone to well under $400 I've seen this float around the 350 360 Mark previously but now that is not the case not only over in the US but over here in the UK too you've got a hard time finding this for anywhere near that price point in fact our current data suggests that the 7800 x3d actually comes in at a staggering $470 that pricing exists because there are no other good gaming CPUs out there right now I mean heck the core Ultra 9 is okay when it comes to multi-threaded Performance but it's not going to compete against the 7800 x3d and certainly not at their respective MSRP price points now of course we are expecting AMD to bring out newer x3d CPUs pretty imminently at least that's what the rumor milk seems to suggest and that should help ease the demand and supply issues on the 7800 x3d and it other x3d Bigger Brothers now what that means really is that for gaming there's a couple of easy recommendations on the lower end you'll want to go for the ryzen 5 7600 either the x or the nonex version while keeping your eye on the 9600 X to see if this Falls further if this gets to around the 230 235 Mark I think it could be a very compelling CPU if you want a little bit more Firepower yes you may want to consider a ryzen 7 chip but you'd be better with a 7800 x3d all waiting for the new x3d chips and this to fall in price I'm not suggesting that this chip at around $500 is a particularly good bik so that's gaming but what about the high-end multicore side is this where Intel regain a little bit of composure and the answer is actually yes because if you take the pricing data we've gathered on all these CPUs right now and couple up with the cinebench multi-course scores of all of these chips you actually see that Intel has the lowest cost per frame and not just on one or two CPUs but pretty much the whole range while our cinebench data and tests in applications like d vinu resolve don't show the core Ultra 9 to be beating out the 14900 K in every scenario it does still beat out all but one of amd's options on the higher end for multicore workloads in to they're not completely dead and buried yes it's disappointing to see no more performance over 13 and 14th gen and I'm not saying that you should buy the core Ultra 9 necessarily but don't discount Intel completely I feel like there's a little bit of a sentiment right now that Intel forgot how to make CPUs with 13th and 14th gen and then completely dropped the ball with core Ultra but the fact of the matter is when it comes to high multicore workloads AMD do suffer just a little bit in fact the 7800x 3D at its current pricing but perhaps more fairly the 79 50x 3D which is price G to a much lower extent actually has the highest cost per thousand points in cinebench R23 and chips like the ryzen 9 7900 X aren't much better in fact Intel's core Ultra 5 which is just not that great actually beats out pretty much all of AMD CPUs on a cost per performance basis in multicore tasks like cine bench ultimately the CPU Market is a little bit disjointed right now but good value deals on motherboards especially whether you go lash gen or even AMD whose current gen platform costs have fallen sharply does at least give some glimmer of hope hopefully AMD can save the market with x3d as Intel and AMD themselves have left the door open with ryzen 9000 and Intel Core Ultra\n"

Random Videos