I bought an RX VEGA 56 Graphics Card in 2023
The Power of the Vega 56: A Gaming Card Review
In this review, we'll be taking a closer look at the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, a popular graphics card that's been making waves in the gaming community. We'll be putting it through its paces with a series of benchmark tests to see how it performs in various games.
First up is Assassin's Creed Odyssey, which was set to ultra high settings, including TAA enabled. The average frame rate came out to 60 FPS, and while there were some minor dips below 59, the overall experience was smooth and enjoyable. The game's performance was impressive, especially considering the high-end settings that were used.
Next up is Marvel Spider-Man remastered, which was also set to ultra high settings with TAA enabled. Again, the average frame rate came out to be around 60 FPS, although there were some minor dips below 59. However, the game's performance held up well even in busy areas of the town, making it a great choice for gamers who want a smooth experience.
In contrast, Halo Infinite was set to medium settings with TAA enabled, which allowed us to hit an average frame rate of 70 FPS. This was a significant improvement over the ultra-high setting we tried earlier, and it showed that the Vega 56 can handle demanding games at lower resolutions.
The Witcher 3 was next up, and we put the card through its paces in next-gen mode with TAA enabled. The average frame rate came out to be around 87 FPS, which is impressive considering the game's high-end graphics settings. However, when we switched to ultra-high settings, the frame rate dropped slightly, although it still remained very smooth.
Finally, we took a look at Grand Theft Auto V, which was set to its highest settings apart from MSAA, with FXAA instead. The average frame rate came out to be around 95 FPS, which is extremely high considering the game's demanding graphics settings. The Vega 56 performed admirably in this game, and it showed that it can handle even the most demanding titles.
However, not all games were created equal, and we did encounter some issues with Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II. Despite setting the game to ultra-high settings with TAA enabled, the average frame rate came out to be around 67 FPS, although there were some minor dips below 59. When we switched to medium settings, the average frame rate improved significantly, but there were still some issues with the one percent value dropping below 57.
In conclusion, the Vega 56 is a powerful graphics card that can handle demanding games at high resolutions and frame rates. While it may not be perfect, and there are some occasional issues with frame rates, it's still a great option for gamers who want a smooth experience without breaking the bank. However, we do recommend considering other options, such as the Radeon RX 5600 XT or the Vega 64, which may offer better performance at similar price points.
As we move forward in the gaming industry, it's clear that the Vega 56 is still a great option for gamers who want a powerful graphics card without breaking the bank. While there may be some occasional issues with frame rates, these can often be mitigated by adjusting settings or using other techniques to optimize performance. With its impressive performance and reasonable price point, the Vega 56 is definitely worth considering for gamers looking for a reliable and high-performance graphics card.
In terms of pricing, the Vega 56 is generally priced around $300-$400, which is competitive with other high-end graphics cards on the market. However, it's worth noting that prices can vary depending on the region and retailer, so it's always a good idea to shop around and compare prices before making a purchase.
Overall, the Vega 56 is a great option for gamers who want a powerful graphics card without breaking the bank. While there may be some occasional issues with frame rates, these can often be mitigated by adjusting settings or using other techniques to optimize performance. With its impressive performance and reasonable price point, the Vega 56 is definitely worth considering for gamers looking for a reliable and high-performance graphics card.
"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enhello everyone and welcome to another video now this is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 launched in 2017 at 400 US Dollars it was positioned to compete with nvidia's 1070 and it did exactly that albeit with higher power consumption and in the case of this model noise as a blower style card it can be found cheaper than other Vega gpus I paid just 100 pounds here in the UK and for that sort of money I think it's definitely a solid choice we have 3584 cores dx12 support and 8 gigs of hbm2 Samsung memory today we're testing it and it's out of the box State though making some adjustments to the voltage clock speeds and bios isn't off the table for another video These blower cards aren't for everyone but I've always liked the aesthetic and one thing I didn't know was that this fan actually stops under low load I really didn't know that was a thing with cards of this nature it's nice though because the silencer idle provides a welcome break from what could otherwise be labeled as a sound of military jets compilation we've also got a nice light up logo and load indicator by the power connectors too but let's see how it performs I want to start on a less impressive note and this is not by any means representative of how this video will continue but the Vega 56 produced some underwhelming figures in cyberpunk 2077. this happened with the Radeon 7 I tested a while ago as well so maybe this game just doesn't agree with these gpus here we have cyberpunk 2077 then at 1080p with the high crowds High textures and the medium preset now at Native resolution we're seeing 47 FPS on average with a 1 low of 38 and a 0.1 low of 36. the gameplay experience is okay but I do feel like we should be hitting more here and I can't help but think that the 1070 The Once equivalent of this card would do a lot better even when I turned FSR on it didn't make much of a difference in fact I think it made things worse to be honest as you can see from this footage it really wasn't an ideal experience but let's move on to some more games ones that do perform better at this res next up we have fortnite this one is fairly easy to run even at the higher preset here aside from that I went with 100 res and I enabled TAA as the anti-aliasing solution nanite was also off as this does affect our frame rate figures quite a bit on average we saw 97 FPS which was very respectable with a one percent low of 78 and a 0.1 low of 69 so more than playable here but you could always turn things down to medium or lower if you wanted at least 120 144 FPS something like that or you could leave the resolution scale at its default 87 When selecting this preset Red Dead Redemption 2 is up next of course at 1080p with the ultra textures for TAA I went with the medium option but everything else was pretty much on high the geometry load was set to Max the grass slot was set to 2 out of 10 and the water physics were set to medium as you can see by these settings here now overall we saw at least 60 FPS on average even in and around the busier parts of the game so 71 to be exact with a one percent number 56 and a 0.1 low of 51 so not much in the way of stutter or slow down here now Elder Marine does have a 60 FPS cap by default but I always like to test this because it can be problematic with some older GPU architectures as well as some older CPUs so I always like to throw this in and see if it can actually hit the cap with certain Hardware here we had no problems with the Vega 56 hitting 60 frames per second there were one or two little dips and drops but nothing really all that notable nothing substantial by any means so this game is definitely more than playable and it hardly stresses the card at these settings at all really Forza Horizon 5 is up next at 1080p with the ultra preset and TAA 77 frames per second on average that's not to say it wasn't a good experience because it was especially when you look at these on screen figures 77 FPS as an average followed by one percent of 67 and a 0.1 percent of 66 so so it was smooth as you like throughout today's gameplay test The Last of Us probably one of the newer games that we've tested today I dropped things to medium for this one and here we saw 56 FPS now it probably wouldn't take much to get to 60 we could either enable FSL or we could turn a couple of options down lower but I didn't really feel it necessary I decided to stick with medium here I mean there were some instances whereby we hit at least 60 frames per second anyway one or two little drops in silly places one was when I put the ladder up against the wall and another was when I drew back the bow in this gameplay but that was it um other than that it was a pretty smooth experience on this card and for a hundred pounds well I do think that this is a really good price to Performance ratio Hogwarts Legacy is up next and now I found that this generally performs better on AMD cards or at least the AMD cards that I own 1080p here with the higher p you said nothing has really changed this was also the recommended preset for the game TAA was set to low and there was no upscaling or anything like that enabled here 68 FPS was the average even in the busier town of hogsmead here the frame rate held up fairly well the further into the town I went the more the frame rate sort of dropped but overall it stayed really steady and I was more than happy with this result Marvel Spider-Man remastered is up next 1080p with a high preset nothing else changed and TAA enabled here as well I seemed like a sensible place to start and I found that this was actually more than playable here a few little dips and drops below 60 but nothing major and with 82 as an average I think this was a more than acceptable experience again for the price I paid well I can't complain too much but as you can imagine by now the Vega is sounding like a busy airport Halo infinite is up next put this one back in the benchmarks at high it didn't quite hit 60 so I went with the medium preset as you can see everything is set to medium here this allowed us to hit 70 FPS with a one percent of 57 and a 0.1 percent low of a solid 53 so no issues with gameplay really here but you could choose low if you wanted an even higher frame rate just to try and remain a little more competitive I guess as well The Witcher 3 up next in next gen mode of course the X12 enabled 1080p Ultra Hairworks was off and taau was enabled some of the other effects were also off basically all of them you know all the other optional extras that used to be under post processing in the old version of the game they were all off 87 FPS on average I did start off with high but I thought that was doing pretty well it was up towards 90 100 FPS so I retested the game at Ultra it looks a little bit better as well with the ultra preset and the frame rate still held up very steadily so I decided to stick with this and as you can see it was a pretty acceptable experience even in and around busy towns Grand Theft Auto 5 is older but when you turn the settings way up as I've done here it can still prove quite demanding even on once powerful cars like this one basically the highest settings apart from msaa because that was off I instead opted for FXAA because it has a lot less of an impact on the frame rate and frame times the advanced Graphics are also on and set to their respective maximums 95 FPS on average with a one percent of 67 and the point I'm still over 59 so a very smooth experience for GTA 5 and the Vega 56 very enjoyable in this case Now Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 is a bit like cyberpunk in that I feel like we should have been able to get a few more frames from it um not necessarily the average either but I did experience some issues with the one percent sorry the 0.1 low this wasn't just um with this Ultra preset either when I turned things down the average did improve as you might expect it but there were still dips and drops and I'm not really sure what caused this could just be the architecture of course or the uh the drivers I'm not really sure but this is something I saw with the Radeon 7 there were games in my benchmarking roster that didn't quite perform as I would have liked or performed worse than I thought they would so that's probably something to bear in mind with this card I think other options may not be as powerful but you might find more consistency if you choose something else and while we're on the subject a cheap 1070 might be a bit less might be a tiny bit more a Radeon RX 5600 XT 5700 XT you might find those for a very similar price and they'll offer more performance with less power consumption in the case of the 5600 XT anyway not sure about the 5700 XT we'll have to revisit that there's also the Vega 64 which may not be that much more expensive but could offer better performance than in this steel as well so always consider all of your options but from a standalone point of view the Vega 56 for the money you can get it for is still very capable in 2023 but you might find that the occasional game does let you down a little bit in terms of the frame rates that come from it so just bear that in mind but I hope you've enjoyed this video and I hope you find it helpful nonetheless if you did leave a like on it down below leave a dislike if you didn't subscribe to the channel if you haven't done so already and hopefully I'll see all of you in the next onehello everyone and welcome to another video now this is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 launched in 2017 at 400 US Dollars it was positioned to compete with nvidia's 1070 and it did exactly that albeit with higher power consumption and in the case of this model noise as a blower style card it can be found cheaper than other Vega gpus I paid just 100 pounds here in the UK and for that sort of money I think it's definitely a solid choice we have 3584 cores dx12 support and 8 gigs of hbm2 Samsung memory today we're testing it and it's out of the box State though making some adjustments to the voltage clock speeds and bios isn't off the table for another video These blower cards aren't for everyone but I've always liked the aesthetic and one thing I didn't know was that this fan actually stops under low load I really didn't know that was a thing with cards of this nature it's nice though because the silencer idle provides a welcome break from what could otherwise be labeled as a sound of military jets compilation we've also got a nice light up logo and load indicator by the power connectors too but let's see how it performs I want to start on a less impressive note and this is not by any means representative of how this video will continue but the Vega 56 produced some underwhelming figures in cyberpunk 2077. this happened with the Radeon 7 I tested a while ago as well so maybe this game just doesn't agree with these gpus here we have cyberpunk 2077 then at 1080p with the high crowds High textures and the medium preset now at Native resolution we're seeing 47 FPS on average with a 1 low of 38 and a 0.1 low of 36. the gameplay experience is okay but I do feel like we should be hitting more here and I can't help but think that the 1070 The Once equivalent of this card would do a lot better even when I turned FSR on it didn't make much of a difference in fact I think it made things worse to be honest as you can see from this footage it really wasn't an ideal experience but let's move on to some more games ones that do perform better at this res next up we have fortnite this one is fairly easy to run even at the higher preset here aside from that I went with 100 res and I enabled TAA as the anti-aliasing solution nanite was also off as this does affect our frame rate figures quite a bit on average we saw 97 FPS which was very respectable with a one percent low of 78 and a 0.1 low of 69 so more than playable here but you could always turn things down to medium or lower if you wanted at least 120 144 FPS something like that or you could leave the resolution scale at its default 87 When selecting this preset Red Dead Redemption 2 is up next of course at 1080p with the ultra textures for TAA I went with the medium option but everything else was pretty much on high the geometry load was set to Max the grass slot was set to 2 out of 10 and the water physics were set to medium as you can see by these settings here now overall we saw at least 60 FPS on average even in and around the busier parts of the game so 71 to be exact with a one percent number 56 and a 0.1 low of 51 so not much in the way of stutter or slow down here now Elder Marine does have a 60 FPS cap by default but I always like to test this because it can be problematic with some older GPU architectures as well as some older CPUs so I always like to throw this in and see if it can actually hit the cap with certain Hardware here we had no problems with the Vega 56 hitting 60 frames per second there were one or two little dips and drops but nothing really all that notable nothing substantial by any means so this game is definitely more than playable and it hardly stresses the card at these settings at all really Forza Horizon 5 is up next at 1080p with the ultra preset and TAA 77 frames per second on average that's not to say it wasn't a good experience because it was especially when you look at these on screen figures 77 FPS as an average followed by one percent of 67 and a 0.1 percent of 66 so so it was smooth as you like throughout today's gameplay test The Last of Us probably one of the newer games that we've tested today I dropped things to medium for this one and here we saw 56 FPS now it probably wouldn't take much to get to 60 we could either enable FSL or we could turn a couple of options down lower but I didn't really feel it necessary I decided to stick with medium here I mean there were some instances whereby we hit at least 60 frames per second anyway one or two little drops in silly places one was when I put the ladder up against the wall and another was when I drew back the bow in this gameplay but that was it um other than that it was a pretty smooth experience on this card and for a hundred pounds well I do think that this is a really good price to Performance ratio Hogwarts Legacy is up next and now I found that this generally performs better on AMD cards or at least the AMD cards that I own 1080p here with the higher p you said nothing has really changed this was also the recommended preset for the game TAA was set to low and there was no upscaling or anything like that enabled here 68 FPS was the average even in the busier town of hogsmead here the frame rate held up fairly well the further into the town I went the more the frame rate sort of dropped but overall it stayed really steady and I was more than happy with this result Marvel Spider-Man remastered is up next 1080p with a high preset nothing else changed and TAA enabled here as well I seemed like a sensible place to start and I found that this was actually more than playable here a few little dips and drops below 60 but nothing major and with 82 as an average I think this was a more than acceptable experience again for the price I paid well I can't complain too much but as you can imagine by now the Vega is sounding like a busy airport Halo infinite is up next put this one back in the benchmarks at high it didn't quite hit 60 so I went with the medium preset as you can see everything is set to medium here this allowed us to hit 70 FPS with a one percent of 57 and a 0.1 percent low of a solid 53 so no issues with gameplay really here but you could choose low if you wanted an even higher frame rate just to try and remain a little more competitive I guess as well The Witcher 3 up next in next gen mode of course the X12 enabled 1080p Ultra Hairworks was off and taau was enabled some of the other effects were also off basically all of them you know all the other optional extras that used to be under post processing in the old version of the game they were all off 87 FPS on average I did start off with high but I thought that was doing pretty well it was up towards 90 100 FPS so I retested the game at Ultra it looks a little bit better as well with the ultra preset and the frame rate still held up very steadily so I decided to stick with this and as you can see it was a pretty acceptable experience even in and around busy towns Grand Theft Auto 5 is older but when you turn the settings way up as I've done here it can still prove quite demanding even on once powerful cars like this one basically the highest settings apart from msaa because that was off I instead opted for FXAA because it has a lot less of an impact on the frame rate and frame times the advanced Graphics are also on and set to their respective maximums 95 FPS on average with a one percent of 67 and the point I'm still over 59 so a very smooth experience for GTA 5 and the Vega 56 very enjoyable in this case Now Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 is a bit like cyberpunk in that I feel like we should have been able to get a few more frames from it um not necessarily the average either but I did experience some issues with the one percent sorry the 0.1 low this wasn't just um with this Ultra preset either when I turned things down the average did improve as you might expect it but there were still dips and drops and I'm not really sure what caused this could just be the architecture of course or the uh the drivers I'm not really sure but this is something I saw with the Radeon 7 there were games in my benchmarking roster that didn't quite perform as I would have liked or performed worse than I thought they would so that's probably something to bear in mind with this card I think other options may not be as powerful but you might find more consistency if you choose something else and while we're on the subject a cheap 1070 might be a bit less might be a tiny bit more a Radeon RX 5600 XT 5700 XT you might find those for a very similar price and they'll offer more performance with less power consumption in the case of the 5600 XT anyway not sure about the 5700 XT we'll have to revisit that there's also the Vega 64 which may not be that much more expensive but could offer better performance than in this steel as well so always consider all of your options but from a standalone point of view the Vega 56 for the money you can get it for is still very capable in 2023 but you might find that the occasional game does let you down a little bit in terms of the frame rates that come from it so just bear that in mind but I hope you've enjoyed this video and I hope you find it helpful nonetheless if you did leave a like on it down below leave a dislike if you didn't subscribe to the channel if you haven't done so already and hopefully I'll see all of you in the next one\n"