The Concerns Surrounding 5G Technology: Separating Fact from Fiction

As 5G technology begins to roll out, some people are worried about the potential health effects of this new and untested technology. Some opponents of 5G point to a World Health Organization report in 2011 that suggests cellphone radiation could cause cancer. However, we need to examine the facts behind these claims and look at the science behind 5G technology.

The Skin as a Barrier Against Radiation

The skin is a very effective barrier against things like bacteria, viruses, and even the weather. This means that 5G radiation, which falls in between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, only barely penetrates the skin. Moreover, 5G wavelengths do not have enough energy to damage DNA or cause harm to human cells. This information suggests that 5G is unlikely to be a significant health risk.

The World Health Organization Report

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was tasked with evaluating the potential health effects of radiofrequency radiation, which includes cellphone signals. The IARC report from 2011 suggested that there may be a link between long-term use of mobile phones and an increased risk of brain cancer. However, this report has been widely criticized as it features huge amounts of radiation and exposure that far exceeds what humans would experience in real life.

Mountains of Research: Separating Fact from Fiction

Despite the IARC report, thousands of scientific studies have been performed looking at radiofrequency radiation and its effects on human cells, animals like rats and mice, and human tissue including brain, skin, and eyes. These studies have consistently shown that there is no link between cellphone radiation and cancer. However, online, we can find hundreds of websites and Facebook groups with a laundry list of problems allegedly associated with 5G. We decided to take a look at this list and clear up some of the misconceptions.

The Truth About 5G: It's Not New

Contrary to what many people may think, 5G is not entirely new technology. The wavelengths used in 5G have been around for a long time and are already being used in airport scanners and radar systems. Initially, 5G will actually use the same wavelengths as 4G. This means that more antennas will be needed to ensure coverage, which could lead to increased exposure.

The Science of Radiation: Ionizing vs Non-Ionizing

Ionizing radiation is what we typically think of when it comes to cancer-causing effects. However, non-ionizing radiation, like radio waves and microwaves, is different. Even visible light can penetrate the skin if it's powerful enough. This means that 5G radiation, which falls in between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, is unlikely to be a significant health risk.

The Importance of Further Research

Despite the lack of evidence linking 5G to cancer, more research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. This includes studying how 5G millimeter wavelengths affect human health and looking at environmental impacts. We need good science and not just anecdotal information or misinformation spread on social media.

Conclusion

As we move forward with 5G technology, it's essential that we separate fact from fiction and look at the science behind this new technology. While there are valid concerns about radiation safety, the evidence suggests that 5G is unlikely to be a significant health risk. However, more research is needed to fully understand its effects on human health and the environment.

The Concerns Surrounding 5G Technology: Separating Fact from Fiction

As 5G technology begins to roll out, some people are worried about the potential health effects of this new and untested technology. Some opponents of 5G point to a World Health Organization report in 2011 that suggests cellphone radiation could cause cancer. However, we need to examine the facts behind these claims and look at the science behind 5G technology.

The Skin as a Barrier Against Radiation

The skin is a very effective barrier against things like bacteria, viruses, and even the weather. This means that 5G radiation, which falls in between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, only barely penetrates the skin. Moreover, 5G wavelengths do not have enough energy to damage DNA or cause harm to human cells. This information suggests that 5G is unlikely to be a significant health risk.

The World Health Organization Report

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was tasked with evaluating the potential health effects of radiofrequency radiation, which includes cellphone signals. The IARC report from 2011 suggested that there may be a link between long-term use of mobile phones and an increased risk of brain cancer. However, this report has been widely criticized as it features huge amounts of radiation and exposure that far exceeds what humans would experience in real life.

Mountains of Research: Separating Fact from Fiction

Despite the IARC report, thousands of scientific studies have been performed looking at radiofrequency radiation and its effects on human cells, animals like rats and mice, and human tissue including brain, skin, and eyes. These studies have consistently shown that there is no link between cellphone radiation and cancer. However, online, we can find hundreds of websites and Facebook groups with a laundry list of problems allegedly associated with 5G. We decided to take a look at this list and clear up some of the misconceptions.

The Truth About 5G: It's Not New

Contrary to what many people may think, 5G is not entirely new technology. The wavelengths used in 5G have been around for a long time and are already being used in airport scanners and radar systems. Initially, 5G will actually use the same wavelengths as 4G. This means that more antennas will be needed to ensure coverage, which could lead to increased exposure.

The Science of Radiation: Ionizing vs Non-Ionizing

Ionizing radiation is what we typically think of when it comes to cancer-causing effects. However, non-ionizing radiation, like radio waves and microwaves, is different. Even visible light can penetrate the skin if it's powerful enough. This means that 5G radiation, which falls in between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, is unlikely to be a significant health risk.

The Importance of Further Research

Despite the lack of evidence linking 5G to cancer, more research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. This includes studying how 5G millimeter wavelengths affect human health and looking at environmental impacts. We need good science and not just anecdotal information or misinformation spread on social media.

Conclusion

As we move forward with 5G technology, it's essential that we separate fact from fiction and look at the science behind this new technology. While there are valid concerns about radiation safety, the evidence suggests that 5G is unlikely to be a significant health risk. However, more research is needed to fully understand its effects on human health and the environment.

The Concerns Surrounding 5G Technology: Separating Fact from Fiction

As 5G technology begins to roll out, some people are worried about the potential health effects of this new and untested technology. Some opponents of 5G point to a World Health Organization report in 2011 that suggests cellphone radiation could cause cancer. However, we need to examine the facts behind these claims and look at the science behind 5G technology.

The Skin as a Barrier Against Radiation

The skin is a very effective barrier against things like bacteria, viruses, and even the weather. This means that 5G radiation, which falls in between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, only barely penetrates the skin. Moreover, 5G wavelengths do not have enough energy to damage DNA or cause harm to human cells. This information suggests that 5G is unlikely to be a significant health risk.

The World Health Organization Report

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was tasked with evaluating the potential health effects of radiofrequency radiation, which includes cellphone signals. The IARC report from 2011 suggested that there may be a link between long-term use of mobile phones and an increased risk of brain cancer. However, this report has been widely criticized as it features huge amounts of radiation and exposure that far exceeds what humans would experience in real life.

Mountains of Research: Separating Fact from Fiction

Despite the IARC report, thousands of scientific studies have been performed looking at radiofrequency radiation and its effects on human cells, animals like rats and mice, and human tissue including brain, skin, and eyes. These studies have consistently shown that there is no link between cellphone radiation and cancer. However, online, we can find hundreds of websites and Facebook groups with a laundry list of problems allegedly associated with 5G. We decided to take a look at this list and clear up some of the misconceptions.

The Truth About 5G: It's Not New

Contrary to what many people may think, 5G is not entirely new technology. The wavelengths used in 5G have been around for a long time and are already being used in airport scanners and radar systems. Initially, 5G will actually use the same wavelengths as 4G. This means that more antennas will be needed to ensure coverage, which could lead to increased exposure.

The Science of Radiation: Ionizing vs Non-Ionizing

Ionizing radiation is what we typically think of when it comes to cancer-causing effects. However, non-ionizing radiation, like radio waves and microwaves, is different. Even visible light can penetrate the skin if it's powerful enough. This means that 5G radiation, which falls in between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, is unlikely to be a significant health risk.

The Importance of Further Research

Despite the lack of evidence linking 5G to cancer, more research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. This includes studying how 5G millimeter wavelengths affect human health and looking at environmental impacts. We need good science and not just anecdotal information or misinformation spread on social media.

Conclusion

As we move forward with 5G technology, it's essential that we separate fact from fiction and look at the science behind this new technology. While there are valid concerns about radiation safety, the evidence suggests that 5G is unlikely to be a significant health risk. However, more research is needed to fully understand its effects on human health and the environment.

As we move forward with 5G technology, it's essential that we separate fact from fiction and look at the science behind this new technology. While there are valid concerns about radiation safety, the evidence suggests that 5G is unlikely to be a significant health risk. However, more research is needed to fully understand its effects on human health and the environment.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enfive g's all the rage right now but some people are worried that it could make them sick so we've decided to do a deep dive on this new technology and find out how it affects the human body roll that tape are you sick of slow mobile data speeds do you hate waiting for video streaming services to load is the Second Life you built in virtual reality to escape the crushing existence of the real world constantly disappointing you then if we got the gift for you introducing 5g fudgie is the next-generation technology for mobile networks and evolution of 3g and 4g that promises lightning-fast speeds lower latency and increased network connections it's now rolling out to a telco provider near you and all you need to do alrightso 5g sure sounds like a promising new technology but some are concerned it may have adverse health effects in November 2018 a social media post went viral and suggested that in the Netherlands 300 birds have died due to 5g testing forums are awash with activists suggesting that the dangers of cellphone radiation are being suppressed so does 5g actually have health effects or is it just a conspiracy theory that's getting a little bit out of hand whack on your tinfoil hats we're gonna find out okay so why are people afraid of 5g one word radiation all of our connected devices emit radiofrequency electromagnetic energy of various wavelengths low-frequency wavelengths are used in say powering your smartphone's TVs and computers and this is referred to as non ionizing radiation it's not considered energetic enough to cause any health effects on the other side of the spectrum you have high frequency wavelengths such as ultraviolet radiation from the Sun or x-rays this is a more powerful type of energy and it's known as ionizing radiation it can rip electrons away from atoms and do some real damage to DNA and if you're exposed to a lot of this type of radiation like say some of these beachgoers maybe it can introduce errors into your DNA causing the growth of diseases such as cancer fortunately 5g radiation is non ionizing completely different to radiation from the Sun or from x-rays wait so why are people worried well there are a few important changes coming with 5g technology that have some people concerned about the negative health effects one it'll use millimeter-wave technology to that technology operates at higher frequencies than 3g and 4g and three that means we'll need more base stations and antennas to ensure we cover the same ground so how exactly will millimeter wave technology affect the human body we're gonna need a diagram the skin is a very effective barrier against things like bacteria viruses and even the weather now here's the thing about 5g ionizing radiation such as some wavelengths of UV from the Sun can penetrate the skin whereas things like radio waves actually penetrate through the skin without doing any damage at all 5g wavelengths fall smack in the middle they only barely penetrate the skin and they don't have the energy required to damage DNA still that information isn't enough to allay fears many opponents of 5g point to a World Health Organization report in 2011 that suggests cellphone radiation could cause cancer now that report was put together by the International Agency for research on cancer and suggest that cellphone radiation should be listed as possibly carcinogenic like aloe leaf extract diesel fuel and pickled vegetables so I asked Andrew Wood University exactly what thousands of scientific studies have been performed looking at radiofrequency radiation and its effects on human cells animals like rats and mice and human tissue including brain skin and eyes and there's literally mountains of data and mounds of research suggesting that there's no link between cellphone radiation and something like cancer but take a look online and you'll find hundreds of websites and Facebook groups with a laundry list of problems apparently associated with 5g so we've taken a look at this list we're gonna clear those things up roll that clip me thanks Jackson mark is ready so 5g is new and untested well actually 5g isn't new the wavelengths have been used in airport scanners and radar for a long time and initially 5g will actually use the same wavelengths as 4G more antennas means more exposure as we've already shown 5g isn't energetic enough to penetrate the skin or damage DNA some scientists even suggest that new beam forming technology could reduce exposure high frequency wavelengths are worse than low frequency wavelengths well that's not the case for ionizing radiation and other radio waves I mean even visible light can penetrate the skin is it's powerful enough and of course 5g is a mind-control experiment that sounds great but other studies such other cellphone use causes cancer well man that's kind of complicated the easy answer is not really two of the most frequently mentioned studies are one the u.s. national toxicology study and to a study by Italy's Rama Zini Institute in both studies male rats that were exposed to huge amounts of radiofrequency radiation sometimes develop cancer in their hearts and in their brains however the studies have been dubbed controversial because they feature huge amounts of radiation and exposure that far exceeds what humans would experience making it much harder to draw conclusions all that is to say that many of the arguments against 5g are not based in strong scientific fact despite that over 240 scientists and researchers have petitioned the World Health Organization Environment Programme to take another look at the damage radiofrequency radiation may be having and not just on humans but also on the environment and one question that remains is can we actually grool out the long-term effects of exposure to zero and that makes sense right I mean phones practically surround every single facet of our daily lives and they've done so over the last 20 years so we should see an increase in the incidence of brain tumors but we don't studies in the US Europe and Australia have all failed to show increasing brain cancer rates since the 1990s when phones became adopted even though 5g hasn't been around long enough to perform these types of studies with cell phones the frequencies and wavelengths that users have been anything about these frequencies because people used to use waveguides communication systems and also for radar systems so where does that leave us well on one hand we need more good science we need more research into 5g millimeter wavelengths and long term studies examining how exposure affects human health what we don't need is Denise from Facebook telling everyone that cellphones are going to give them cancer or that 5g is a mind-control experiment Denise seriously give it a rest anyway i'm jackson ryan science editor at cnet.com and you're probably watching this on a mobile phone emitting radiation but don't worry it's not going to kill you yeah I just didn't really I was talking about how radiation is not gonna give you this stuff mom momfive g's all the rage right now but some people are worried that it could make them sick so we've decided to do a deep dive on this new technology and find out how it affects the human body roll that tape are you sick of slow mobile data speeds do you hate waiting for video streaming services to load is the Second Life you built in virtual reality to escape the crushing existence of the real world constantly disappointing you then if we got the gift for you introducing 5g fudgie is the next-generation technology for mobile networks and evolution of 3g and 4g that promises lightning-fast speeds lower latency and increased network connections it's now rolling out to a telco provider near you and all you need to do alrightso 5g sure sounds like a promising new technology but some are concerned it may have adverse health effects in November 2018 a social media post went viral and suggested that in the Netherlands 300 birds have died due to 5g testing forums are awash with activists suggesting that the dangers of cellphone radiation are being suppressed so does 5g actually have health effects or is it just a conspiracy theory that's getting a little bit out of hand whack on your tinfoil hats we're gonna find out okay so why are people afraid of 5g one word radiation all of our connected devices emit radiofrequency electromagnetic energy of various wavelengths low-frequency wavelengths are used in say powering your smartphone's TVs and computers and this is referred to as non ionizing radiation it's not considered energetic enough to cause any health effects on the other side of the spectrum you have high frequency wavelengths such as ultraviolet radiation from the Sun or x-rays this is a more powerful type of energy and it's known as ionizing radiation it can rip electrons away from atoms and do some real damage to DNA and if you're exposed to a lot of this type of radiation like say some of these beachgoers maybe it can introduce errors into your DNA causing the growth of diseases such as cancer fortunately 5g radiation is non ionizing completely different to radiation from the Sun or from x-rays wait so why are people worried well there are a few important changes coming with 5g technology that have some people concerned about the negative health effects one it'll use millimeter-wave technology to that technology operates at higher frequencies than 3g and 4g and three that means we'll need more base stations and antennas to ensure we cover the same ground so how exactly will millimeter wave technology affect the human body we're gonna need a diagram the skin is a very effective barrier against things like bacteria viruses and even the weather now here's the thing about 5g ionizing radiation such as some wavelengths of UV from the Sun can penetrate the skin whereas things like radio waves actually penetrate through the skin without doing any damage at all 5g wavelengths fall smack in the middle they only barely penetrate the skin and they don't have the energy required to damage DNA still that information isn't enough to allay fears many opponents of 5g point to a World Health Organization report in 2011 that suggests cellphone radiation could cause cancer now that report was put together by the International Agency for research on cancer and suggest that cellphone radiation should be listed as possibly carcinogenic like aloe leaf extract diesel fuel and pickled vegetables so I asked Andrew Wood University exactly what thousands of scientific studies have been performed looking at radiofrequency radiation and its effects on human cells animals like rats and mice and human tissue including brain skin and eyes and there's literally mountains of data and mounds of research suggesting that there's no link between cellphone radiation and something like cancer but take a look online and you'll find hundreds of websites and Facebook groups with a laundry list of problems apparently associated with 5g so we've taken a look at this list we're gonna clear those things up roll that clip me thanks Jackson mark is ready so 5g is new and untested well actually 5g isn't new the wavelengths have been used in airport scanners and radar for a long time and initially 5g will actually use the same wavelengths as 4G more antennas means more exposure as we've already shown 5g isn't energetic enough to penetrate the skin or damage DNA some scientists even suggest that new beam forming technology could reduce exposure high frequency wavelengths are worse than low frequency wavelengths well that's not the case for ionizing radiation and other radio waves I mean even visible light can penetrate the skin is it's powerful enough and of course 5g is a mind-control experiment that sounds great but other studies such other cellphone use causes cancer well man that's kind of complicated the easy answer is not really two of the most frequently mentioned studies are one the u.s. national toxicology study and to a study by Italy's Rama Zini Institute in both studies male rats that were exposed to huge amounts of radiofrequency radiation sometimes develop cancer in their hearts and in their brains however the studies have been dubbed controversial because they feature huge amounts of radiation and exposure that far exceeds what humans would experience making it much harder to draw conclusions all that is to say that many of the arguments against 5g are not based in strong scientific fact despite that over 240 scientists and researchers have petitioned the World Health Organization Environment Programme to take another look at the damage radiofrequency radiation may be having and not just on humans but also on the environment and one question that remains is can we actually grool out the long-term effects of exposure to zero and that makes sense right I mean phones practically surround every single facet of our daily lives and they've done so over the last 20 years so we should see an increase in the incidence of brain tumors but we don't studies in the US Europe and Australia have all failed to show increasing brain cancer rates since the 1990s when phones became adopted even though 5g hasn't been around long enough to perform these types of studies with cell phones the frequencies and wavelengths that users have been anything about these frequencies because people used to use waveguides communication systems and also for radar systems so where does that leave us well on one hand we need more good science we need more research into 5g millimeter wavelengths and long term studies examining how exposure affects human health what we don't need is Denise from Facebook telling everyone that cellphones are going to give them cancer or that 5g is a mind-control experiment Denise seriously give it a rest anyway i'm jackson ryan science editor at cnet.com and you're probably watching this on a mobile phone emitting radiation but don't worry it's not going to kill you yeah I just didn't really I was talking about how radiation is not gonna give you this stuff mom mom\n"