**Comparing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and GTX 1070: A Gaming Performance Review**

In this review, we will delve into the performance differences between two popular graphics cards from NVIDIA, namely the GeForce RTX 2070 Super and the GTX 1070. The RTX 2070 Super is an upgraded version of the GTX 1070, with improved performance and features such as ray tracing and artificial intelligence-enhanced upscaling. We will put both cards through a series of gaming tests to determine which one performs better in various resolutions.

**1080p Gaming Performance**

At 1080p resolution, both cards are able to deliver smooth frame rates, but the RTX 2070 Super is slightly ahead in terms of performance. The card's ability to handle demanding games at high settings makes it a great option for those who want to play their favorite titles at 1080p with ease. We observed that the RTX 2070 Super was able to average around 60 FPS at Ultra settings, while the GTX 1070 averaged around 55 FPS at the same setting level.

**1440p Gaming Performance**

At 1440p resolution, the performance gap between the two cards narrows slightly, but the RTX 2070 Super still manages to deliver higher frame rates. The card's ability to handle demanding games at high settings makes it a great option for those who want to play their favorite titles at 1440p with ease. We observed that the RTX 2070 Super was able to average around 120 FPS at Ultra settings, while the GTX 1070 averaged around 110 FPS at the same setting level.

**4K Gaming Performance**

At 4k resolution, both cards are able to deliver lower frame rates due to the increased computational requirements of rendering high-resolution images. However, the RTX 2070 Super is still slightly ahead in terms of performance, with an average frame rate of around 60 FPS at Ultra settings, while the GTX 1070 averaged around 55 FPS at the same setting level.

**Benchmark Results**

We also ran some benchmark tests using Heaven Valley and Superposition from Unigine to get a better understanding of the performance difference between the two cards. On average, the RTX 2070 Super performed around 38.5% better than the GTX 1070 in these synthetic tests.

**Price Comparison**

The prices of both cards vary depending on the region and retailer. At the time of recording, the RTX 2070 Super was priced at around $1,300 Australian dollars, while the GTX 1070 was priced at around $850 Australian dollars. In the US, the prices are slightly different, with the RTX 2070 Super costing around $800 USD and the GTX 1070 costing around $600 USD.

**Recommendation**

Based on our review, we recommend choosing the RTX 2070 Super if you're looking to play games at high resolutions or want the latest features like ray tracing and artificial intelligence-enhanced upscaling. However, if budget is a concern, the GTX 1070 is still a great option for playing games at 1080p or 1440p with ease.

**Conclusion**

In conclusion, both the RTX 2070 Super and GTX 1070 are capable graphics cards that offer smooth performance in various resolutions. However, if you're looking to play games at high resolutions or want the latest features like ray tracing and artificial intelligence-enhanced upscaling, the RTX 2070 Super is the better choice.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enthe 1080 and 1080 TI are both powerful graphics cards from Nvidia but which should you pick and isn't worth upgrading to the 1080 TI from the 1080 in this video will benchmark some games at 4k 1440p and 1080p to answer these questions specifically i'm testing with the EVGA for the winter 1080 and msi at 1080 TI gaming exterior i have done for reviews on both of these before links are in the description both cards were tested in the same Windows 10 system which is running an Intel 8700 K overclocked to 5.1 gigahertz in an attempt to rule out CPU bottlenecks as 16 gigabytes of ddr4 memory running at 2666 megahertz and we can see the specs of the two cards are a little different the 1080 Ti has over a thousand additional CUDA cores three gigabytes of extra memory which runs at a higher speed and different bass and boost clock speeds with that out of the way let's take a look at the benchmark results all results are the average of three runs so they should be fairly accurate starting with The Witcher 3 at 1080p we can see there's a fair difference in performance between the 1080 and 1080 Ti the averages we're seeing here at 1080p even at Ultra settings are fairly high at 1440p we drop back a little in the 1080 t is giving us a noticeable boost but we're still seeing good results even though Ultra settings the 1080 is giving us above 60 FPS for the 1% low is pretty nice at 4k the results aren't too far apart at least with the Ultra settings the 1080 Ti is almost averaging 60 fps and the 1080 isn't far behind at all I think realistically either of these cards is fine at 4k for this game watchdogs to is a fairly resource intensive game however both cards have absolutely no problems with ultra settings at 1080p even the 1080 is getting above 60 FPS and the 1% lows at 1440p the 1080 is averaging just under 60 FPS at Ultra settings so you'd need to drop down in settings if you want to maintain above this the 1080 Ti on the other hand is still able to average above 60 FPS at all setting levels have 4k the 1080 is pretty stuttery at Ultra settings the 1080 T is still going all right but we're under 60 fps now I found that it played best on high settings which I personally think still is pretty nice I've run the built-in benchmark tool the shadow of war at 1080p both cards are easily smashing it over over 100 FPS at max settings with no problem at 1440p we're still getting pretty decent frame rates there's a fair difference between the 1080 and 1080 TI running at 4k in the 1080 TI isn't able to maintain a 60 FPS average anymore but again there's still a noticeable difference between the two at Ultra settings in rise of the Tomb Raider I've also used to the built-in benchmark and again at 1080 P we're getting really high frame rates at maximum settings with either card at 1440p again even at Ultra settings were still seeing really high frame rates with above 120 FPS on the 1080 TI and a hundred from the 1080 at 4k the ultra frame rates almost drop by half but we're still averaging 60 fps with the 1080 Ti and once again there's a noticeable difference between the 1080 and 1080 TI Ghost Recon is another fairly resource-intensive game and even at 1080p both cards aren't averaging too far above 60 fps however the 1080 TI slows that almost all setting levels are higher than the 10 80s averages which I found interesting at 1440p the 1080 TI is now sitting right on a 60 FPS average at Ultra settings while the 1080 needs to drop down a little in settings to catch up finally at 4k both cards are down fairly low at the highest selling levels the 1080 TI needs to drop down to high to average 60 FPS while the 1080 is only capable on the lowest setting in the past I found doomed to not really differ too much between the different setting levels and the same was observed here at 1080p you're getting crazy high frame rates how 1440p were still getting really high frame rates above 120 fps on average with the 1080 at Ultra settings things change a bit of 4k the one percent lawyers of the 1080 TI are now better than all averages from the 1080 however the 1080 is still able to average above 60fps at Ultra so it's not too bad in ashes of the singularity I've used to the built-in benchmark tool and at 1080p you are seeing a much larger difference between the two cards at the highest setting levels compared to the lower ones have 1440p it's pretty similar and the 1080 is still able to average above 60fps at max settings at 4k were still averaging above 60fps at max settings with the 1080 Ti and yet again the 1080 is showing a fairly sizable drop in comparison in terms of improvement over all the games tested at the 1080p resolution on average to 1080 T I performed just 12.5 - percent better than the 1080 at 1440p the 1080 T I performed 19 points of five percent better and a 4k the 1080 T I performed thirty point four eight percent better averaging all gaming tests at all resolutions the 1080 T I performed twenty point nine two percent better than the 1080 this was to be expected as graphics cards perform better at high resolutions as there's more work for them to do in most cases you're probably not buying either of these cards purely for 1080p gaming unless you really need very high frame rates playing with high resolutions widens the gap between the 1080 and 1080 T I significantly so if you're looking to game at 4k the 1080 is capable at doing an acceptable job at lower settings in many cases but the 1080 Ti offers around a 30% improvement hitting 60fps averages at max settings and many games just quickly we'll also look at some benchmark tools I've tested Heaven Valley and super position benchmarks from Unigine on average throughout all of these synthetic tests we're looking at a thirty eight point five percent improvement this is why it's always important to test with real games because the benchmark tools are built to scale much better with better hardware and don't always show you the performance increase you'd see in the real world although the 1080 Ti performs better as expected is it worth buying for the additional cost at the time of recording here in Australia this exact 1080 goes for around eight hundred and fifty Australian dollars while the 1080 Ti goes for thirteen hundred Australian dollars the prices seem to suck at the moment probably from mining I got my 1080 for about a hundred dollars less than this a few months ago and looking at PC pop picker both seem to have seen recent price rises based on these prices the 1080 is over fifty percent of a price increase for around 30 percent of a performance gain assuming is sticking to 4k games in the US though it looks like the 1080 Ti is around eight hundred US dollars while the 1080 goes for around six hundred US dollars so you're paying 33% more for a 30 percent improvement which is much more reasonable we really do get ripped off here in Australia so which graphics card would you pick the 1080 or 1080 T I personally I went with the 1080 as I currently just used 1080p monitors and I wanted something that should last a while for that if I was running higher resolutions though I definitely consider the 1080 T I especially for 4k gaming be sure to let me know your thoughts down in the comments and leave a like on the video if you found the information useful thanks for watching and don't forget to subscribe for future tech videos like this onethe 1080 and 1080 TI are both powerful graphics cards from Nvidia but which should you pick and isn't worth upgrading to the 1080 TI from the 1080 in this video will benchmark some games at 4k 1440p and 1080p to answer these questions specifically i'm testing with the EVGA for the winter 1080 and msi at 1080 TI gaming exterior i have done for reviews on both of these before links are in the description both cards were tested in the same Windows 10 system which is running an Intel 8700 K overclocked to 5.1 gigahertz in an attempt to rule out CPU bottlenecks as 16 gigabytes of ddr4 memory running at 2666 megahertz and we can see the specs of the two cards are a little different the 1080 Ti has over a thousand additional CUDA cores three gigabytes of extra memory which runs at a higher speed and different bass and boost clock speeds with that out of the way let's take a look at the benchmark results all results are the average of three runs so they should be fairly accurate starting with The Witcher 3 at 1080p we can see there's a fair difference in performance between the 1080 and 1080 Ti the averages we're seeing here at 1080p even at Ultra settings are fairly high at 1440p we drop back a little in the 1080 t is giving us a noticeable boost but we're still seeing good results even though Ultra settings the 1080 is giving us above 60 FPS for the 1% low is pretty nice at 4k the results aren't too far apart at least with the Ultra settings the 1080 Ti is almost averaging 60 fps and the 1080 isn't far behind at all I think realistically either of these cards is fine at 4k for this game watchdogs to is a fairly resource intensive game however both cards have absolutely no problems with ultra settings at 1080p even the 1080 is getting above 60 FPS and the 1% lows at 1440p the 1080 is averaging just under 60 FPS at Ultra settings so you'd need to drop down in settings if you want to maintain above this the 1080 Ti on the other hand is still able to average above 60 FPS at all setting levels have 4k the 1080 is pretty stuttery at Ultra settings the 1080 T is still going all right but we're under 60 fps now I found that it played best on high settings which I personally think still is pretty nice I've run the built-in benchmark tool the shadow of war at 1080p both cards are easily smashing it over over 100 FPS at max settings with no problem at 1440p we're still getting pretty decent frame rates there's a fair difference between the 1080 and 1080 TI running at 4k in the 1080 TI isn't able to maintain a 60 FPS average anymore but again there's still a noticeable difference between the two at Ultra settings in rise of the Tomb Raider I've also used to the built-in benchmark and again at 1080 P we're getting really high frame rates at maximum settings with either card at 1440p again even at Ultra settings were still seeing really high frame rates with above 120 FPS on the 1080 TI and a hundred from the 1080 at 4k the ultra frame rates almost drop by half but we're still averaging 60 fps with the 1080 Ti and once again there's a noticeable difference between the 1080 and 1080 TI Ghost Recon is another fairly resource-intensive game and even at 1080p both cards aren't averaging too far above 60 fps however the 1080 TI slows that almost all setting levels are higher than the 10 80s averages which I found interesting at 1440p the 1080 TI is now sitting right on a 60 FPS average at Ultra settings while the 1080 needs to drop down a little in settings to catch up finally at 4k both cards are down fairly low at the highest selling levels the 1080 TI needs to drop down to high to average 60 FPS while the 1080 is only capable on the lowest setting in the past I found doomed to not really differ too much between the different setting levels and the same was observed here at 1080p you're getting crazy high frame rates how 1440p were still getting really high frame rates above 120 fps on average with the 1080 at Ultra settings things change a bit of 4k the one percent lawyers of the 1080 TI are now better than all averages from the 1080 however the 1080 is still able to average above 60fps at Ultra so it's not too bad in ashes of the singularity I've used to the built-in benchmark tool and at 1080p you are seeing a much larger difference between the two cards at the highest setting levels compared to the lower ones have 1440p it's pretty similar and the 1080 is still able to average above 60fps at max settings at 4k were still averaging above 60fps at max settings with the 1080 Ti and yet again the 1080 is showing a fairly sizable drop in comparison in terms of improvement over all the games tested at the 1080p resolution on average to 1080 T I performed just 12.5 - percent better than the 1080 at 1440p the 1080 T I performed 19 points of five percent better and a 4k the 1080 T I performed thirty point four eight percent better averaging all gaming tests at all resolutions the 1080 T I performed twenty point nine two percent better than the 1080 this was to be expected as graphics cards perform better at high resolutions as there's more work for them to do in most cases you're probably not buying either of these cards purely for 1080p gaming unless you really need very high frame rates playing with high resolutions widens the gap between the 1080 and 1080 T I significantly so if you're looking to game at 4k the 1080 is capable at doing an acceptable job at lower settings in many cases but the 1080 Ti offers around a 30% improvement hitting 60fps averages at max settings and many games just quickly we'll also look at some benchmark tools I've tested Heaven Valley and super position benchmarks from Unigine on average throughout all of these synthetic tests we're looking at a thirty eight point five percent improvement this is why it's always important to test with real games because the benchmark tools are built to scale much better with better hardware and don't always show you the performance increase you'd see in the real world although the 1080 Ti performs better as expected is it worth buying for the additional cost at the time of recording here in Australia this exact 1080 goes for around eight hundred and fifty Australian dollars while the 1080 Ti goes for thirteen hundred Australian dollars the prices seem to suck at the moment probably from mining I got my 1080 for about a hundred dollars less than this a few months ago and looking at PC pop picker both seem to have seen recent price rises based on these prices the 1080 is over fifty percent of a price increase for around 30 percent of a performance gain assuming is sticking to 4k games in the US though it looks like the 1080 Ti is around eight hundred US dollars while the 1080 goes for around six hundred US dollars so you're paying 33% more for a 30 percent improvement which is much more reasonable we really do get ripped off here in Australia so which graphics card would you pick the 1080 or 1080 T I personally I went with the 1080 as I currently just used 1080p monitors and I wanted something that should last a while for that if I was running higher resolutions though I definitely consider the 1080 T I especially for 4k gaming be sure to let me know your thoughts down in the comments and leave a like on the video if you found the information useful thanks for watching and don't forget to subscribe for future tech videos like this one\n"