The Future of Call of Duty: Sledgehammer's Potential Involvement

What up Gamers! It is simply pops, and we have some more Call of Duty news to share with you. Shocking news has emerged that Sledgehammer may be making the next Call of Duty game. Yes, you heard that right - Sledgehammer, a studio known for their work on Modern Warfare 3 and Advanced Warfare, could be behind the latest installment in the iconic franchise. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the gaming community, with many fans eager to know more about what this new game would entail.

The creator of the channel, which we'll refer to as "Simply Pops," is clearly excited about the potential news. They've been making videos predicting kill streaks and other Call of Duty-related content, including a recent video about Black Ops 3. The Simply Pops has expressed their enthusiasm for Black Ops 3's World War II setting, which they had been eagerly anticipating. However, with Sledgehammer potentially involved in the next game, their excitement has taken a bit of a hit.

Simply Pops is being cautious when it comes to their stance on Sledgehammer making the next Call of Duty game. While they acknowledge that Sledgehammer is a capable studio, they're not entirely convinced that they'd be the best fit for the franchise. In fact, Simply Pops has expressed doubts about Sledgehammer's involvement in creating a World War II-themed game, citing their work on Modern Warfare 3 as an example of their focus on more contemporary settings.

Despite these reservations, Simply Pops acknowledges the benefits of having three studios working on Call of Duty: Treyarch, Infinity Ward, and now potentially Sledgehammer. This approach would allow for a smoother development process, with less pressure to release games on a yearly basis. The Simply Pops believes that this three-year cycle is an excellent idea, similar to the approach taken by Battlefield, which takes two or three years to develop.

The prospect of Sledgehammer making the next Call of Duty game has sparked debate among fans and gamers alike. Some are excited at the prospect of a new studio bringing their unique perspective to the franchise, while others are concerned about the potential impact on the series' identity. As Simply Pops notes, there's no guarantee that Sledgehammer would be able to deliver a bug-free game, but they do believe that this approach could lead to a more polished and refined final product.

In conclusion, the news of Sledgehammer potentially making the next Call of Duty game has left many fans eager for more information. While Simply Pops is cautiously optimistic about this development, they're also aware of the potential risks and uncertainties involved. As we wait to hear more about Sledgehammer's involvement in Call of Duty, one thing is certain - this could be an exciting chapter in the franchise's history.

The Benefits of a Three-Year Cycle

One of the most significant advantages of having three studios working on Call of Duty is the ability to spread development over a longer period. By giving each studio sufficient time to create their game, the pressure to release a polished product within a tight deadline is significantly reduced. This approach allows for more flexibility and creativity in the development process, resulting in games that are both engaging and well-crafted.

The Simply Pops notes that this three-year cycle is reminiscent of the Battlefield franchise, which takes an average of two or three years to develop. The success of Battlefield is a testament to the benefits of this approach, with many fans praising the game's polished gameplay and refined mechanics. If Call of Duty can adopt a similar strategy, it could lead to games that are both more enjoyable and less buggy.

Of course, there are no guarantees that Sledgehammer would be able to deliver a bug-free game, even with their three-year development cycle in place. However, the Simply Pops believes that this approach could significantly reduce the number of bugs and issues present in modern Call of Duty games. By giving each studio sufficient time to create their game, the chances of hackers and other exploits being exposed are minimized.

Overall, the prospect of Sledgehammer making the next Call of Duty game has sparked debate among fans and gamers alike. While there are risks involved, the benefits of a three-year cycle could lead to a more refined and polished final product. As we wait to hear more about this development, one thing is certain - this could be an exciting chapter in the franchise's history.

Leave a Like if you're excited about Sledgehammer potentially making the next Call of Duty game! Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enwhat up Gamers it is simply pops and we have some more Call of Duty news so it's shocking news that Sledgehammer may make the next Call of Duty game I know I've been making videos prediction kill streaks about Black Ops 3 because I was really really excited for Black Ops 3 being in World War II and there was another video that was supposed to come out about about Black Ops 3 with the leaked pictures but I saw it on Reddit that Sledgehammer may make the next Call of Duty game who knows it might be Modern Warfare 4 it might be it might be a futuristic game or a modern game all honesty guys I'm not gonna buy it if Sledgehammer is gonna make it but I heard they are good it is going to be a three year cycle so this is good this is good on Treyarch side and this is good on the Infinity Ward side so we have three people that's making Call of Duty game and this is good it it kind of gives them some more time to make the game instead of having having patches and patches as soon as the game come out and it's just annoying I'm happy they did this um I guess they just have to make a game every year I guess that's how they want to be but I think this is going to be good on Treyarch side too but imma be honest with you guys I'm not gonna buy the sledgehammer game it depends if there's good reviews or if they do something different you know it's slightly different but I think the three-year cycle is an amazing idea I think three years is like a perfect time Battlefield takes two or three years to make and look how Battlefield is it's just a very very successful game it might have a buggy start in the beginning but all honesty is a great game everything is nice and I'm just curious to see how Call of Duty will be in three years you know so I don't know I was really leaning towards Black Ops 3 being World War II but who knows Sledgehammer may make it World War II too but I don't know I doubt it but anyway leave a like and a comment if you loved that Call of Duty made this move of a three-year cycle um it's gonna make the game a lot smoother less buggy um it's no guarantee it may be bug free but there's gonna probably be some bugs and hackers exposed but it's gonna be less chances and we're gonna have overall a better game well that's all happen now have a simple day I will see you guys when I see you guys peacewhat up Gamers it is simply pops and we have some more Call of Duty news so it's shocking news that Sledgehammer may make the next Call of Duty game I know I've been making videos prediction kill streaks about Black Ops 3 because I was really really excited for Black Ops 3 being in World War II and there was another video that was supposed to come out about about Black Ops 3 with the leaked pictures but I saw it on Reddit that Sledgehammer may make the next Call of Duty game who knows it might be Modern Warfare 4 it might be it might be a futuristic game or a modern game all honesty guys I'm not gonna buy it if Sledgehammer is gonna make it but I heard they are good it is going to be a three year cycle so this is good this is good on Treyarch side and this is good on the Infinity Ward side so we have three people that's making Call of Duty game and this is good it it kind of gives them some more time to make the game instead of having having patches and patches as soon as the game come out and it's just annoying I'm happy they did this um I guess they just have to make a game every year I guess that's how they want to be but I think this is going to be good on Treyarch side too but imma be honest with you guys I'm not gonna buy the sledgehammer game it depends if there's good reviews or if they do something different you know it's slightly different but I think the three-year cycle is an amazing idea I think three years is like a perfect time Battlefield takes two or three years to make and look how Battlefield is it's just a very very successful game it might have a buggy start in the beginning but all honesty is a great game everything is nice and I'm just curious to see how Call of Duty will be in three years you know so I don't know I was really leaning towards Black Ops 3 being World War II but who knows Sledgehammer may make it World War II too but I don't know I doubt it but anyway leave a like and a comment if you loved that Call of Duty made this move of a three-year cycle um it's gonna make the game a lot smoother less buggy um it's no guarantee it may be bug free but there's gonna probably be some bugs and hackers exposed but it's gonna be less chances and we're gonna have overall a better game well that's all happen now have a simple day I will see you guys when I see you guys peace\n"