The Impact of Snap's Decision on Its Audience and the Country at Large

As a prominent social media platform, Snap's decision to remove political ads from its platform has sent shockwaves throughout the online community. The company's audience, which is predominantly younger and more influenced by popular culture, was seemingly pleased with this move. In fact, many users took to social media to express their support for Snap's decision, citing concerns about the impact of targeted advertising on democracy.

However, not everyone shared this sentiment. Some critics argued that Snap's decision would ultimately benefit its own bottom line, as it would allow the company to maintain a more neutral stance in the midst of increasingly polarized politics. "I understand why Snap made that decision," said one user. "They're looking out for their business and making a smart move to protect themselves from controversy."

Others pointed out that while Snap's decision may be a positive step, it also highlighted the larger issue of the influence of money in politics. "Facebook's refusal to take a stand against Trump's message was already problematic," said another user. "But if Facebook is really committed to not taking any political ads, then maybe other platforms should follow suit."

For Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, this decision represents an opportunity to rebrand his company as a leader in promoting free speech and democratic values. However, some critics argue that this move is nothing more than a PR stunt designed to deflect attention from the company's own complicity in the spread of misinformation on its platform.

The Impact on Business

For Snap, the removal of political ads may have both positive and negative effects on its business. On the one hand, it allows the company to maintain a reputation for neutrality and avoid controversy that may arise from hosting polarizing content. On the other hand, it could potentially harm the company's bottom line if not enough users opt out of targeted advertising.

"I think this is going to be good for Snap," said one user. "They're making a smart move to protect their brand and maintain a positive image." However, others pointed out that Facebook's own experience with taking down Trump's ads suggests that this strategy may not always work in the company's favor.

The Cynical View

Some critics, on the other hand, view Snap's decision as a cynical attempt to profit from the increasing polarization of American politics. "Facebook is already spending millions of dollars on ad campaigns," said one user. "And now they're going to lose out on even more revenue if everyone else follows suit?"

This perspective highlights the complex relationship between money and politics in America. While some argue that targeted advertising has a corrosive effect on democracy, others see it as an opportunity for candidates to reach voters directly.

For users like Stacy, who have seen firsthand the impact of social media on their daily lives, these questions are pressing. "I don't think it's just about Facebook or Snap," she said. "It's about how we're using our online platforms to connect with each other and influence public discourse."

The Future of Advertising

As the debate over targeted advertising continues, one thing is clear: the industry will continue to evolve in response to changing consumer habits and technological advancements. Whether or not this means a future without targeted ads on social media remains to be seen.

For now, users like Jake are simply trying to make sense of it all. "I think political ads are a good idea period," he said. "But if we can't afford to do that in the real world, maybe we should focus on other ways to promote democracy and free speech."

The Impact on America

Ultimately, Snap's decision has significant implications for American politics and society at large. By removing targeted ads from its platform, the company is sending a message about the importance of free speech and democratic values.

However, some critics argue that this move will only serve to further polarize the electorate, as those with more money are able to reach their audiences directly through targeted advertising. As one user pointed out, "This is just another example of how big money is influencing our politics."

Benjamin Franklin once said, "We must all hang together or most assuredly we shall all hang separately." In this context, the debate over targeted advertising on social media can be seen as a microcosm of the broader struggle for democracy and free speech in America.

As the country continues to grapple with these complex issues, it remains to be seen whether Snap's decision will have a lasting impact on American politics. One thing is certain, however: the conversation about targeted advertising has only just begun.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enthis is twit so stacy what do you think about snap's decision what was snap stitch so the difference here the difference here is snap um what one second and i'll preamble um facebook says we will not judge anything off platform we will only judge that which you put on the platform which is why it took so long for them to get to uh alex jones uh they were judging that it's why these other sites that are still up there it's an issue snap said we're gonna judge what you do on other platforms we're gonna go off the world and we're not gonna promote you so snap made a different decision um that was about their disapproval of not what he did on their platform but who he is and what he does what'd you think of that i so given snap's audience i'm okay with that um just because they're even more mush mind did yeah well no i just they're they're younger they're more influenced influenceable they're more easily influenced and i also now i also think that i think that the president is doing such a bad job right now in terms of the country that it's hard that it's hard not to take a stand against him i guess or it's hard not to take a stand that's pretty he's such a it's not just that he's a polarizing figure he's also i don't this hurts me he doesn't live up to what i think america's ideals are even if you want to take the cynical view of what america's ideals are so i feel like if you are a business owner and you overlook this it really does feel like you're complicit in something that you're going to regret later on and so i understand why snap would make that decision so the other question you asked a while ago sorry it's also a much smaller platform so but yeah go ask ask your deep thoughts a while ago do you think this was good or bad for stamps business just a picture i think it's probably going to be good for snap's business i mean do i think i think it would probably be a little bit harmful to facebook's business in the short term which which would be i think facebook speak uh to for facebook just take a stand against trump's message the cynic would say oh facebook's looking forward to the windfall profits from trump's massive ad campaigns they've already spent right many millions of dollars and plan to spend many more before november that's pretty cynical and i think mark's probably made enough money that he can afford not to take i wish i honestly wish facebook would say we're not going to do any political ads that would be something i would ask mark to do at dinner you see i was against that at uh twitter i thought that was the wrong move i can't remember what you said at the time stacy i don't remember what i said what would be wrong about what would be wrong with facebook saying yeah you know we can't control it we got the russians i don't know what's going on well let's just stop taking ad money for political ads because it's my my congress person here especially right now i'll give you the answer right now because i want to work with my congress person here and i can't go knocking on any doors what i can do is give them money to put ads up on facebook targeted i thought facebook didn't even target people to our district ads do oh ads do ads ads but not the not the news announcements from my friends like everything else terrible vaccine experience it's a playing field right yes you can you can put up stuff yeah to either side of anything witness witness benjamin franklin once again and then it's a playing field that's there um you get rid of if you get rid of all uh social media targeted advertising my problem is that you're left with television you're left with big well i think political ads in general are a good idea period well there's that period yeah they don't yeah let's just i mean but since we don't ban political ads we don't afford to do that yeah but we could afford to do that on social media if you're gonna do it on one you're then driving that well it would be nice to do it elsewhere but since but let's we're talking about facebook here i'm not talking about abc's decisions uh but why wouldn't i am just because only big money can then run for office in this country including small officers i don't think that's true because i don't my daughter is not on tv i am not on tv like i don't see ads unless they're on the internet period or in a in a physical magazine you're probably unusual though yeah you are you're you're you're a competitor i don't know in a generation it would be interesting to see like how how that has changed because it has changed and i don't think it's that unusual in a certain demographic let me rephrase that actually i blocked all the ads on facebook while i was on facebook so i didn't see any ads so honestly uh joe trippy said in his when did joe trippy write it uh joe trippy book that's one of the best parts of the internet the revolution will not be televised 2004. so he said television was over then we then have citizens united we still have big money involved in all the elections and it's not just uh facebook facebook is actually little money it's not it's it's pretty damn cheap it's quite cheap super cheap oh my gosh i can run an ad campaign on facebook for so little yeah sorry right they're very effective too youthis is twit so stacy what do you think about snap's decision what was snap stitch so the difference here the difference here is snap um what one second and i'll preamble um facebook says we will not judge anything off platform we will only judge that which you put on the platform which is why it took so long for them to get to uh alex jones uh they were judging that it's why these other sites that are still up there it's an issue snap said we're gonna judge what you do on other platforms we're gonna go off the world and we're not gonna promote you so snap made a different decision um that was about their disapproval of not what he did on their platform but who he is and what he does what'd you think of that i so given snap's audience i'm okay with that um just because they're even more mush mind did yeah well no i just they're they're younger they're more influenced influenceable they're more easily influenced and i also now i also think that i think that the president is doing such a bad job right now in terms of the country that it's hard that it's hard not to take a stand against him i guess or it's hard not to take a stand that's pretty he's such a it's not just that he's a polarizing figure he's also i don't this hurts me he doesn't live up to what i think america's ideals are even if you want to take the cynical view of what america's ideals are so i feel like if you are a business owner and you overlook this it really does feel like you're complicit in something that you're going to regret later on and so i understand why snap would make that decision so the other question you asked a while ago sorry it's also a much smaller platform so but yeah go ask ask your deep thoughts a while ago do you think this was good or bad for stamps business just a picture i think it's probably going to be good for snap's business i mean do i think i think it would probably be a little bit harmful to facebook's business in the short term which which would be i think facebook speak uh to for facebook just take a stand against trump's message the cynic would say oh facebook's looking forward to the windfall profits from trump's massive ad campaigns they've already spent right many millions of dollars and plan to spend many more before november that's pretty cynical and i think mark's probably made enough money that he can afford not to take i wish i honestly wish facebook would say we're not going to do any political ads that would be something i would ask mark to do at dinner you see i was against that at uh twitter i thought that was the wrong move i can't remember what you said at the time stacy i don't remember what i said what would be wrong about what would be wrong with facebook saying yeah you know we can't control it we got the russians i don't know what's going on well let's just stop taking ad money for political ads because it's my my congress person here especially right now i'll give you the answer right now because i want to work with my congress person here and i can't go knocking on any doors what i can do is give them money to put ads up on facebook targeted i thought facebook didn't even target people to our district ads do oh ads do ads ads but not the not the news announcements from my friends like everything else terrible vaccine experience it's a playing field right yes you can you can put up stuff yeah to either side of anything witness witness benjamin franklin once again and then it's a playing field that's there um you get rid of if you get rid of all uh social media targeted advertising my problem is that you're left with television you're left with big well i think political ads in general are a good idea period well there's that period yeah they don't yeah let's just i mean but since we don't ban political ads we don't afford to do that yeah but we could afford to do that on social media if you're gonna do it on one you're then driving that well it would be nice to do it elsewhere but since but let's we're talking about facebook here i'm not talking about abc's decisions uh but why wouldn't i am just because only big money can then run for office in this country including small officers i don't think that's true because i don't my daughter is not on tv i am not on tv like i don't see ads unless they're on the internet period or in a in a physical magazine you're probably unusual though yeah you are you're you're you're a competitor i don't know in a generation it would be interesting to see like how how that has changed because it has changed and i don't think it's that unusual in a certain demographic let me rephrase that actually i blocked all the ads on facebook while i was on facebook so i didn't see any ads so honestly uh joe trippy said in his when did joe trippy write it uh joe trippy book that's one of the best parts of the internet the revolution will not be televised 2004. so he said television was over then we then have citizens united we still have big money involved in all the elections and it's not just uh facebook facebook is actually little money it's not it's it's pretty damn cheap it's quite cheap super cheap oh my gosh i can run an ad campaign on facebook for so little yeah sorry right they're very effective too you\n"