**The Meta Box NH 58 Rd Review: A Gaming Laptop that Exceeds Expectations**

In this review, we'll delve into the details of the Meta Box NH 58 Rd, a laptop that promises to deliver impressive gaming performance while also offering excellent value for money. With its sleek design and powerful specs, the NH 58 Rd is certainly worth considering for anyone in the market for a new gaming laptop.

**The Performance: A Significant Leap Ahead**

When it comes to performance, the Meta Box NH 58 Rd does not disappoint. In our benchmark tests, we saw that this laptop was able to beat out the other 20 60 Hz machines, including the GTX 1660 Ti, by a significant margin. This is largely due to its powerful CPU and dedicated graphics card, which work together to deliver impressive frame rates in even the most demanding games.

One of the standout features of the NH 58 Rd's performance was its ability to maintain high frame rates in popular titles like Far Cry 5. In this game, we saw that the laptop was able to achieve around 14% better performance than the GTX 1660 Ti, making it a compelling option for gamers who want the best possible experience. Of course, as with any graphics card, there's always some variation depending on the specific test and settings used, but overall, the NH 58 Rd's performance is certainly noteworthy.

**The Design: A Sleek and Professional Look**

One of the things that really sets the Meta Box NH 58 Rd apart from other gaming laptops on the market is its design. Unlike many other laptops in this class, which often feature a more aggressive or gamer-oriented aesthetic, the NH 58 Rd has a clean and professional look that's sure to appeal to anyone who wants a laptop that looks good but still delivers impressive performance.

We were particularly impressed with the laptop's back panel, which features a generous array of ports including HDMI, Ethernet, and a power connector. These ports are all neatly arranged and are easy to access, making it simple to hook up your peripherals or connect your laptop to an external monitor. The only downside is that the laptop still uses USB 2.0 in its port selection, which may be a bit of a disappointment for some users.

**The Value: A Great Deal for the Price**

One of the things that really sets the Meta Box NH 58 Rd apart from other laptops on the market is its value. With a starting price of around $1,700 AUD, this laptop is certainly more affordable than many of its competitors, including the MSI GS65 Stealth and the Razer Blade 15.

Of course, as with any laptop, there's always a trade-off between price and performance, but in this case, we felt that the NH 58 Rd offered excellent value for money. The laptop's impressive performance, combined with its sleek design and generous array of ports, makes it a compelling option for anyone who wants a high-quality gaming laptop without breaking the bank.

**The Verdict: A Great Option for Gamers**

Overall, we were very impressed with the Meta Box NH 58 Rd, and think that it's a great option for gamers who want a powerful laptop that still offers excellent value for money. With its impressive performance, sleek design, and generous array of ports, this laptop is sure to appeal to anyone who wants a high-quality gaming experience.

That being said, we do have a few reservations about the NH 58 Rd's battery life, which was relatively short in our testing. We also noted that the laptop's fan noise was below average, but still noticeable at times when pushing the system hard. Additionally, the laptop does not support Thunderbolt 3, which may be a disappointment for some users.

However, these are minor quibbles in an otherwise excellent package. With its impressive performance, sleek design, and great value for money, we think that the Meta Box NH 58 Rd is definitely worth considering for anyone in the market for a new gaming laptop.

**The Benchmarking Tools**

In addition to our hands-on testing of the NH 58 Rd's performance, we also used a range of benchmarking tools to get a more detailed picture of its capabilities. These included Heaven Valley and Superposition from Unigine, as well as Byt strike time and Spy Port Royal from 3D Mark.

We also used Crystal Disk Mark to test the laptop's storage, which featured a 512GB M.2 NVMe SSD. While the speeds were not spectacular, they were still respectable, and we noted that the drive was able to deliver good performance in our testing.

**The Conclusion**

Overall, we're very impressed with the Meta Box NH 58 Rd, and think that it's a great option for anyone who wants a powerful gaming laptop that offers excellent value for money. With its impressive performance, sleek design, and generous array of ports, this laptop is sure to appeal to anyone who wants a high-quality gaming experience.

If you're in the market for a new gaming laptop, we definitely recommend checking out the NH 58 Rd. While it may not be perfect – its battery life could be longer, and it doesn't support Thunderbolt 3 – its performance, design, and value make it an excellent choice for anyone who wants a great gaming laptop without breaking the bank.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enthe meta box alpha x NH 58 Rd is a well-priced laptop for the specs that you get and it's using one of the best clever models I've tested to date which offers above-average levels of performance so let's find out just how well it performs and see what's on offer in this detailed review for the specs my configuration has an Intel i7 9750 h cpu nvidia r TX 2060 graphics 16 gig of memory running in dual channel a 15.6 inch 1080p 240 hertz screen and a 512 gig MDOT 2 nvme SSD it's also got Gigabit Ethernet Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5 however hardware can be customized while ordering you can check the options as well as updated pricing using the link in the description the laptop has a silver body with the metallic lid and the interior seems to be plastic the edges are smooth but I found the front corners a bit rough if you push up against them otherwise overall it feels quite well built the weight of the laptop is listed at 2.2 kilos bare-bones so expect differences based on hardware selection though mine was under this with the 180 watt power brick and cable for charging included the total weight rises to 2.7 kilos the dimensions of the laptop are 36 point one centimeters in width twenty five point eight centimeters in depth and just under two point eight centimeters in height so not exactly thin but not quite thick either the smaller overall footprint gives us thin bezels around the screen which are about nine millimeters based on my own measurements I requested mine with a 240 Hertz panel as I haven't previously had the chance to test one from them so now we can get some data it's a 15.6 inch 1080p IPS screen but you can pick from 60 Hertz 120 Hertz 144 Hertz or even 4k 60 Hertz options when ordering however there's no G sync with this model I've measured the color gamut of the screen using the spider v Pro and my results returned 96% of srgb 68% of ntsc and 74% of adobe RGB and 100% brightness i measured the panel at 316 nits in the center and the 862 one contrast ratio so decent results overall backlight bleed looked fine here just some very minor glow patches but it was perfectly fine when viewing darker content though this will vary between laptops and panels there was some screenflex however it seemed quite sturdy with the hinges being out towards the far corners it couldn't quite be opened up with one finger as there's more weight towards the back including the cooling and battery but it still felt stable on my lap despite the thin screen bezels the camera is found above the display in the Sun top the camera is a bit blurry but the audio sounds pretty good here's what typing sounds like and this is what it sounds like when we set the fan to max speed so you can still hear me over the fan the keyboard in my unit has RGB backlighting however you can only customize the entire thing in one's own with the included control center software it's got 4 levels of brightness or can be turned off and even the secondary key functions on all keys get lit up overall I liked typing on the keyboard the small shift on the right may annoy some but I don't personally use it so I didn't notice here's how it sounds to give you an idea of what to expect there was a little keyboard flex while pushing down hard which I think should be expected given the keyboard is removable no issues during normal use thorough the touch pad has precision drivers and what well it was smooth to the touch but doesn't actually press down it's got separate left and right click buttons learner fingerprints and dirt are harder to see on the silver finish and as a smooth surface it's easy to clean on the Left there's a Kensington lock air exhaust vent USB 3.1 gen2 on type a port USB 2.0 type a port and 3.5 millimeter microphone and headphone jacks on the right there's a USB 3.1 gen2 type a port mini DisplayPort 1.2 output SD card slot and air exhaust vent on the back there's one air exhaust vent on the left corner the right isn't actually event as the battery is there then from left to right we've got a USB 3.1 gen2 type-c port with DisplayPort 1.3 support no Thunderbolt though HDMI output the version isn't specified but I could run an external 4k monitor at 60 Hertz seems to indicate 2.0 Gigabit Ethernet port and the power input I like that they've got the bulkier such as HDMI Ethernet and power on the back end out of the way meanwhile the front just has some status LEDs towards the right hand side on the lid there's the meta box logo in the center and the bits on the side light up white from the screens backlight underneath it looks like there's heaps of ventilation holes however not that many of these cutout areas actually allow air through but we'll see how the cooling does soon the speakers have found towards the front left and right corners they sounded ok for laptop speakers but we're a bit tinny with no bass here's what we're looking at in terms of maximum volume with music playing and the latency mantras ult's looked ok the bottom panel can be removed by taking our 12 screws with a Philips head screwdriver and the two screws in the back corners are slightly longer the battery is also easily removable so if you have a spare you can quickly swap in a fully charged one a nice and uncommon feature these days underneath the battery there are three more Phillips head screws to take out before the bottom panel can be removed so 15 screws all up once inside from left to right we've got access to the Wi-Fi card single 2.5 inch drive bay 2 memory slots in the middle and two M not two slots towards the right which both support nvme PCIe drives powering the laptop is a removable 4 cell 49 watt hour battery and with the full charge and just watching youtube videos with the screen on half brightness keyboard lighting off and background apps disabled I was able to use it for 3 hours and 17 minutes the Intel integrated graphics were in use during this test due to Nvidia Optimus while playing The Witcher 3 with medium settings and invidious battery boost set to 30fps the battery lasted for 56 minutes and the framerate didn't drop at any point both results were a bit below average though it is a smaller battery paired with decent specs however it is also removable so in theory you could get spare batteries to quickly swap in I'll also note that I never saw the battery drain with the 180 watt power brick plugged in throughout any of my testing let's look at thermals next air is pulled in underneath the machine where there are two fins and heat pipes are shared between the processor and graphics thermal testing was completed with an ambient room temperature 21 degrees Celsius so expect different results in different environments by default meta box are applying a minus 0.1 volt on the vault to the CPU which is great to see they've advised me that they'll be doing this with their laptops going forward so out of the box we should see increased performance the control center software allows us to swap between different power modes quiet entertainment and performance these basically set different power limits and fan speeds and I've tested with them also we can see the differences and idle in quiet mode the temperatures were looking good fans were only just barely audible the rest of the results are from combined CPU and GPU workloads and it meant to represent worst-case scenarios as I ran them for extended periods of time the gaming results towards the upper half of the graph were tested by playing watchdogs - as I find it to use a good combination of processor and graphics the stress test results shown on the lower half of the graph from running to a 264 CPU stress test with only the stress CPU option checked and the heav'n GPU benchmark at max settings at the same time to fully load the system so kind of a worst-case in quiet mode thermal throttling was reported on the GPU this is kind of expected there you'll hear later how quiet it's running so this mode lets you run quieter at the expense of thermals entertainment mode increase the power limits but also fan speeds so the GPU temperature drops back with minimal changes to the CPU performance mode further increased the power limits so we see higher CPU temperatures now as a result 97 is higher than I'd like but as we'll see in the next graph we're getting high levels of performance here adding a cooling pad was able to help out additional under vaulting may have helped a little too but I figured the default minus 0.1 volts was good enough these are the clock speeds for the same tests - shown we can see the low results in quiet mode due to the thermal throttling which then increased quite a bit in entertainment mode in performance mode we're almost seeing the full 4 gigahertz or quarter boost speed of the 97 58 in both tests an excellent result and this explains the highest CPU temperatures that we just saw many machines are not capable of this at all and it's clearly due to the default CPU under vault with the cooling and the temperatures being brought under control we're now seeing a solid four gigahertz average in both tests with the GPU clock speeds also raising presumably as GPU boost for first cooler temperatures these are the average TDP values reported by hardware info during these same tasks we can see that if we want the GPU to perform its best performance mode is required as this raises the GPU power limit up to 90 watts additionally the CPU is also running close to 50 watts even in this combined CPU and GPU stress test most other machines tend to cap this at 45 watts for combined load so this looks like a good result I could play most games all Riteish in quiet mode watchdogs too while doing the thermal testing did have some lag spikes when thermal throttling was being hit constantly less demanding games may be okay though otherwise entertainment mode in performance mode played well it was a bit warmer compared to the lower SPECT configs of the same chassis I've reviewed but this is likely due to the high powered 20 60 graphics so that's going to be a trade-off for more performance I've got some Cinebench results here so we can get an idea of CPU performance by default we're almost averaging 3000 a great result for the 97 58 CPU I've tested many other laptops that get far blur this due to lower power or thermal limits that said I was able to further boost to the power limit higher with Intel XTU and crack the 3100 mark as for the external temperatures where you'll actually be putting your hands at idle it was in the low 30s fairly average while under stress testing quiet mode it gets to the 50s in the center as we saw earlier the internals were quite hot now but the fan was also lower in entertainment more the performance Rises but so does the fan so we're looking at much lower temperatures in performance mode the fan was maxed out and the temperatures are looking about the same as for the fan noise produced by the laptop I'll let you have a listen to some of these tests at idle in the quiet mode the fans were just barely audible while gaming more under stress test with the same quiet mode it was still very quiet so you can see where I guess here Wyatt was throttling there regardless of using entertainer mode performance mode or manually setting the Fender max speed it was reaching the same maximum speed despite this it wasn't too loud about average when compared to most other gaming laptops it didn't get up to 57 decibels like most of us learn which could explain some of the warmer temps next let's take a look at some gaming benchmarks I've tested these with these Nvidia drivers with performance mode in the control center software enabled for best results control was tested walking through the start of the game and I've tested with r-tx enabled in the green bars and r-tx off in purple I don't think this game needs a very high frame rate to play for the most part high settings with r-tx off one Turk a bit medium settings still looks good so I'd prefer the higher framerate RTX on even with all those settings wasn't great in terms of performance though even if it did look nice battlefield 5 was tested in campaign mode and again RTX on results are shown by the green bars RTX played okay at medium settings but when you can get higher FPS with r-tx off in ultra settings and in my opinion have it looked better RTX again doesn't seem too useful apex legends was tested with either all settings at maximum or all settings at the lowest possible values as it doesn't have predefined setting presets it was still playing very well even with max settings but we could get higher results for our 240 Hertz panel a minimum Borderlands 3 was tested using the game's built-in benchmark tool and high settings was needed to maintain an average above 60 fps shadow of the Tomb Raider was tested with the built-in benchmark and these are the best results I've seen from an RT X 2060 laptop so far however we'll compare this game with some other laptops urn far cry 5 was also tested with the built-in benchmark and we'll also take a look at how this game compares against some other laptops shortly csgo was tested with you let achill FPS benchmark and is one of the eSports titles that's actually capable of taking advantage of the 240 Hertz panel even with all settings maxed out the averages were close to this point for tonight also saw decent results with medium settings getting above 200 FPS and looking super smooth with a 240 Hertz panel and it was also capable of reaching 120 FPS even maxed out at epic settings Rainbow six siege was tested with the built-in benchmark and is another title that may actually be able to make use of the 240 Hertz panel at lowest selling levels where we were just able to average 200 at low settings with a 100% render scale very streak on breakpoint was tested using the built-in benchmark and even at the highest ultimate preset was averaging around 60 FPS Junot a decent GPU power and 100 FPS was just hit at medium settings and blur to get some context let's see how it compares with some other gaming laptops use this information as a rough guide only as tests were done at different times with different drivers here are the results from battlefield 5 with ultra settings and I've got the NH 58 Rd highlighted in red near similarly SPECT machines this is the first and only time I've had the r-tx 20 60 ped with a 90 750 H so it could be beating the other 20 60 machines due to that better CPU but regardless it's still in the lead these are the results from Far Cry 5 using the built-in benchmark at Ultra settings again it's ahead of the other 20 60 machines and a little better than a single gtx 1070 laptop although as a cpu heavy test again this could be just you to the slight edge the 9th gen cpu offers in shadow of the Tomb Raider with the built-in benchmark at highest settings the NH 58 Rd was ahead again of the other 2060 machines I've recently tested actually scoring the same as the 2070 max Q in the lenovo y 740 but again there's that small cpu difference however all the gaming performance was good all games ran well even at highest setting levels I found the RT X 2060 to perform around 14% better than the GTX 1660 Ti and in most cases it does seem worth paying a little extra for that said there the 1660 TR is still a nice sweet spot and can also handle pretty much any modern game with good settings at 1080p no problem as we saw in the NH 58 RC review I think our TX on the 2060 is a little underwhelming at the moment I wouldn't personally buy today just with RT X in mind but it may be more useful in the future time will tell I'll also note that we didn't really put the 240 Hertz screen to use outside of eSports titles if this is what you're mainly playing at lower settings then it could definitely be a nice upgrade but for most people I think the 144 Hertz option for 140 Australian dollars less is a better well-rounded choice I've tested a 240 Hertz screen in the past with an RT X 2070 and even there it still only made sense with eSports titles at lower settings now for the benchmarking tools I've tested Heaven Valley and super position from Unigine as well as by a strike time spy portroyal and VR mark from 3d mark just pause the video if you want a detailed look at these results I've used crystal disk mark to test the storage and my 512 gig m dot 2 and Vimy SSD was performing all right but speeds will vary depending entirely on what drive you select when ordering there are quite a few options the SD slot was pretty decent - not amazing bit ahead of many others for updated pricing check the links in the description as prices will change over time at the time of recording in Australia the base model goes for about 17 hundred and 80 Australian dollars this is with dual channel memory though it's 120 dollars more for the 144 Hertz upgrade option which I think would be a good matchup for these specs for gaming for my US friends that's about eleven hundred US dollars without taxes although to actually buy this same clever chassis in the u.s. from Amazon it starts from thirteen hundred and fifty US dollars granted that's with the more expensive 240 Hertz cream let's conclude by looking at the good and bad aspects of the meta box NH 58 Rd while having decent specs to play basically any modern game with good settings the laptop has a clean and professional design without the typical gamer aesthetic the performance is quite impressive once you consider the fan noise it's below average it does get warm under stress test but in most games that seemed fine and the compromise was excellent performance likely thanks to the default minus 0.1 volt under volt that they've introduced in Australia this thing is serious value just for comparison that ISA Helios 300 with 16 60 Ti is at least 400 Australian dollars more money and this was outperforming it in many games I liked that the bulky including HDMI Ethernet and power found on the back of the machine and out of the way the i/o is otherwise pretty decent with SD card slot and type C port though USB 2.0 in 2019 is a bit odd and as is usually the case with these clever units no Thunderbolt 3 support the removable battery is also nice to have you could buy spares and very quickly swap in a fully charged one if you want which would be good as battery life was on the lower side there's not really much else to say overall I found it quite good for the price like the other Alpha X models I've covered this is easily one of the best clever units from meta box I've tested so far based on the specs overall performance and price I think the Alpha X series is offering great value for money especially here in Australia where bigger brands cost way more than they do in the US let me know your thoughts down in the comments and if you're new to the channel consider subscribing for future laptop reviews and tech videos like this onethe meta box alpha x NH 58 Rd is a well-priced laptop for the specs that you get and it's using one of the best clever models I've tested to date which offers above-average levels of performance so let's find out just how well it performs and see what's on offer in this detailed review for the specs my configuration has an Intel i7 9750 h cpu nvidia r TX 2060 graphics 16 gig of memory running in dual channel a 15.6 inch 1080p 240 hertz screen and a 512 gig MDOT 2 nvme SSD it's also got Gigabit Ethernet Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5 however hardware can be customized while ordering you can check the options as well as updated pricing using the link in the description the laptop has a silver body with the metallic lid and the interior seems to be plastic the edges are smooth but I found the front corners a bit rough if you push up against them otherwise overall it feels quite well built the weight of the laptop is listed at 2.2 kilos bare-bones so expect differences based on hardware selection though mine was under this with the 180 watt power brick and cable for charging included the total weight rises to 2.7 kilos the dimensions of the laptop are 36 point one centimeters in width twenty five point eight centimeters in depth and just under two point eight centimeters in height so not exactly thin but not quite thick either the smaller overall footprint gives us thin bezels around the screen which are about nine millimeters based on my own measurements I requested mine with a 240 Hertz panel as I haven't previously had the chance to test one from them so now we can get some data it's a 15.6 inch 1080p IPS screen but you can pick from 60 Hertz 120 Hertz 144 Hertz or even 4k 60 Hertz options when ordering however there's no G sync with this model I've measured the color gamut of the screen using the spider v Pro and my results returned 96% of srgb 68% of ntsc and 74% of adobe RGB and 100% brightness i measured the panel at 316 nits in the center and the 862 one contrast ratio so decent results overall backlight bleed looked fine here just some very minor glow patches but it was perfectly fine when viewing darker content though this will vary between laptops and panels there was some screenflex however it seemed quite sturdy with the hinges being out towards the far corners it couldn't quite be opened up with one finger as there's more weight towards the back including the cooling and battery but it still felt stable on my lap despite the thin screen bezels the camera is found above the display in the Sun top the camera is a bit blurry but the audio sounds pretty good here's what typing sounds like and this is what it sounds like when we set the fan to max speed so you can still hear me over the fan the keyboard in my unit has RGB backlighting however you can only customize the entire thing in one's own with the included control center software it's got 4 levels of brightness or can be turned off and even the secondary key functions on all keys get lit up overall I liked typing on the keyboard the small shift on the right may annoy some but I don't personally use it so I didn't notice here's how it sounds to give you an idea of what to expect there was a little keyboard flex while pushing down hard which I think should be expected given the keyboard is removable no issues during normal use thorough the touch pad has precision drivers and what well it was smooth to the touch but doesn't actually press down it's got separate left and right click buttons learner fingerprints and dirt are harder to see on the silver finish and as a smooth surface it's easy to clean on the Left there's a Kensington lock air exhaust vent USB 3.1 gen2 on type a port USB 2.0 type a port and 3.5 millimeter microphone and headphone jacks on the right there's a USB 3.1 gen2 type a port mini DisplayPort 1.2 output SD card slot and air exhaust vent on the back there's one air exhaust vent on the left corner the right isn't actually event as the battery is there then from left to right we've got a USB 3.1 gen2 type-c port with DisplayPort 1.3 support no Thunderbolt though HDMI output the version isn't specified but I could run an external 4k monitor at 60 Hertz seems to indicate 2.0 Gigabit Ethernet port and the power input I like that they've got the bulkier such as HDMI Ethernet and power on the back end out of the way meanwhile the front just has some status LEDs towards the right hand side on the lid there's the meta box logo in the center and the bits on the side light up white from the screens backlight underneath it looks like there's heaps of ventilation holes however not that many of these cutout areas actually allow air through but we'll see how the cooling does soon the speakers have found towards the front left and right corners they sounded ok for laptop speakers but we're a bit tinny with no bass here's what we're looking at in terms of maximum volume with music playing and the latency mantras ult's looked ok the bottom panel can be removed by taking our 12 screws with a Philips head screwdriver and the two screws in the back corners are slightly longer the battery is also easily removable so if you have a spare you can quickly swap in a fully charged one a nice and uncommon feature these days underneath the battery there are three more Phillips head screws to take out before the bottom panel can be removed so 15 screws all up once inside from left to right we've got access to the Wi-Fi card single 2.5 inch drive bay 2 memory slots in the middle and two M not two slots towards the right which both support nvme PCIe drives powering the laptop is a removable 4 cell 49 watt hour battery and with the full charge and just watching youtube videos with the screen on half brightness keyboard lighting off and background apps disabled I was able to use it for 3 hours and 17 minutes the Intel integrated graphics were in use during this test due to Nvidia Optimus while playing The Witcher 3 with medium settings and invidious battery boost set to 30fps the battery lasted for 56 minutes and the framerate didn't drop at any point both results were a bit below average though it is a smaller battery paired with decent specs however it is also removable so in theory you could get spare batteries to quickly swap in I'll also note that I never saw the battery drain with the 180 watt power brick plugged in throughout any of my testing let's look at thermals next air is pulled in underneath the machine where there are two fins and heat pipes are shared between the processor and graphics thermal testing was completed with an ambient room temperature 21 degrees Celsius so expect different results in different environments by default meta box are applying a minus 0.1 volt on the vault to the CPU which is great to see they've advised me that they'll be doing this with their laptops going forward so out of the box we should see increased performance the control center software allows us to swap between different power modes quiet entertainment and performance these basically set different power limits and fan speeds and I've tested with them also we can see the differences and idle in quiet mode the temperatures were looking good fans were only just barely audible the rest of the results are from combined CPU and GPU workloads and it meant to represent worst-case scenarios as I ran them for extended periods of time the gaming results towards the upper half of the graph were tested by playing watchdogs - as I find it to use a good combination of processor and graphics the stress test results shown on the lower half of the graph from running to a 264 CPU stress test with only the stress CPU option checked and the heav'n GPU benchmark at max settings at the same time to fully load the system so kind of a worst-case in quiet mode thermal throttling was reported on the GPU this is kind of expected there you'll hear later how quiet it's running so this mode lets you run quieter at the expense of thermals entertainment mode increase the power limits but also fan speeds so the GPU temperature drops back with minimal changes to the CPU performance mode further increased the power limits so we see higher CPU temperatures now as a result 97 is higher than I'd like but as we'll see in the next graph we're getting high levels of performance here adding a cooling pad was able to help out additional under vaulting may have helped a little too but I figured the default minus 0.1 volts was good enough these are the clock speeds for the same tests - shown we can see the low results in quiet mode due to the thermal throttling which then increased quite a bit in entertainment mode in performance mode we're almost seeing the full 4 gigahertz or quarter boost speed of the 97 58 in both tests an excellent result and this explains the highest CPU temperatures that we just saw many machines are not capable of this at all and it's clearly due to the default CPU under vault with the cooling and the temperatures being brought under control we're now seeing a solid four gigahertz average in both tests with the GPU clock speeds also raising presumably as GPU boost for first cooler temperatures these are the average TDP values reported by hardware info during these same tasks we can see that if we want the GPU to perform its best performance mode is required as this raises the GPU power limit up to 90 watts additionally the CPU is also running close to 50 watts even in this combined CPU and GPU stress test most other machines tend to cap this at 45 watts for combined load so this looks like a good result I could play most games all Riteish in quiet mode watchdogs too while doing the thermal testing did have some lag spikes when thermal throttling was being hit constantly less demanding games may be okay though otherwise entertainment mode in performance mode played well it was a bit warmer compared to the lower SPECT configs of the same chassis I've reviewed but this is likely due to the high powered 20 60 graphics so that's going to be a trade-off for more performance I've got some Cinebench results here so we can get an idea of CPU performance by default we're almost averaging 3000 a great result for the 97 58 CPU I've tested many other laptops that get far blur this due to lower power or thermal limits that said I was able to further boost to the power limit higher with Intel XTU and crack the 3100 mark as for the external temperatures where you'll actually be putting your hands at idle it was in the low 30s fairly average while under stress testing quiet mode it gets to the 50s in the center as we saw earlier the internals were quite hot now but the fan was also lower in entertainment more the performance Rises but so does the fan so we're looking at much lower temperatures in performance mode the fan was maxed out and the temperatures are looking about the same as for the fan noise produced by the laptop I'll let you have a listen to some of these tests at idle in the quiet mode the fans were just barely audible while gaming more under stress test with the same quiet mode it was still very quiet so you can see where I guess here Wyatt was throttling there regardless of using entertainer mode performance mode or manually setting the Fender max speed it was reaching the same maximum speed despite this it wasn't too loud about average when compared to most other gaming laptops it didn't get up to 57 decibels like most of us learn which could explain some of the warmer temps next let's take a look at some gaming benchmarks I've tested these with these Nvidia drivers with performance mode in the control center software enabled for best results control was tested walking through the start of the game and I've tested with r-tx enabled in the green bars and r-tx off in purple I don't think this game needs a very high frame rate to play for the most part high settings with r-tx off one Turk a bit medium settings still looks good so I'd prefer the higher framerate RTX on even with all those settings wasn't great in terms of performance though even if it did look nice battlefield 5 was tested in campaign mode and again RTX on results are shown by the green bars RTX played okay at medium settings but when you can get higher FPS with r-tx off in ultra settings and in my opinion have it looked better RTX again doesn't seem too useful apex legends was tested with either all settings at maximum or all settings at the lowest possible values as it doesn't have predefined setting presets it was still playing very well even with max settings but we could get higher results for our 240 Hertz panel a minimum Borderlands 3 was tested using the game's built-in benchmark tool and high settings was needed to maintain an average above 60 fps shadow of the Tomb Raider was tested with the built-in benchmark and these are the best results I've seen from an RT X 2060 laptop so far however we'll compare this game with some other laptops urn far cry 5 was also tested with the built-in benchmark and we'll also take a look at how this game compares against some other laptops shortly csgo was tested with you let achill FPS benchmark and is one of the eSports titles that's actually capable of taking advantage of the 240 Hertz panel even with all settings maxed out the averages were close to this point for tonight also saw decent results with medium settings getting above 200 FPS and looking super smooth with a 240 Hertz panel and it was also capable of reaching 120 FPS even maxed out at epic settings Rainbow six siege was tested with the built-in benchmark and is another title that may actually be able to make use of the 240 Hertz panel at lowest selling levels where we were just able to average 200 at low settings with a 100% render scale very streak on breakpoint was tested using the built-in benchmark and even at the highest ultimate preset was averaging around 60 FPS Junot a decent GPU power and 100 FPS was just hit at medium settings and blur to get some context let's see how it compares with some other gaming laptops use this information as a rough guide only as tests were done at different times with different drivers here are the results from battlefield 5 with ultra settings and I've got the NH 58 Rd highlighted in red near similarly SPECT machines this is the first and only time I've had the r-tx 20 60 ped with a 90 750 H so it could be beating the other 20 60 machines due to that better CPU but regardless it's still in the lead these are the results from Far Cry 5 using the built-in benchmark at Ultra settings again it's ahead of the other 20 60 machines and a little better than a single gtx 1070 laptop although as a cpu heavy test again this could be just you to the slight edge the 9th gen cpu offers in shadow of the Tomb Raider with the built-in benchmark at highest settings the NH 58 Rd was ahead again of the other 2060 machines I've recently tested actually scoring the same as the 2070 max Q in the lenovo y 740 but again there's that small cpu difference however all the gaming performance was good all games ran well even at highest setting levels I found the RT X 2060 to perform around 14% better than the GTX 1660 Ti and in most cases it does seem worth paying a little extra for that said there the 1660 TR is still a nice sweet spot and can also handle pretty much any modern game with good settings at 1080p no problem as we saw in the NH 58 RC review I think our TX on the 2060 is a little underwhelming at the moment I wouldn't personally buy today just with RT X in mind but it may be more useful in the future time will tell I'll also note that we didn't really put the 240 Hertz screen to use outside of eSports titles if this is what you're mainly playing at lower settings then it could definitely be a nice upgrade but for most people I think the 144 Hertz option for 140 Australian dollars less is a better well-rounded choice I've tested a 240 Hertz screen in the past with an RT X 2070 and even there it still only made sense with eSports titles at lower settings now for the benchmarking tools I've tested Heaven Valley and super position from Unigine as well as by a strike time spy portroyal and VR mark from 3d mark just pause the video if you want a detailed look at these results I've used crystal disk mark to test the storage and my 512 gig m dot 2 and Vimy SSD was performing all right but speeds will vary depending entirely on what drive you select when ordering there are quite a few options the SD slot was pretty decent - not amazing bit ahead of many others for updated pricing check the links in the description as prices will change over time at the time of recording in Australia the base model goes for about 17 hundred and 80 Australian dollars this is with dual channel memory though it's 120 dollars more for the 144 Hertz upgrade option which I think would be a good matchup for these specs for gaming for my US friends that's about eleven hundred US dollars without taxes although to actually buy this same clever chassis in the u.s. from Amazon it starts from thirteen hundred and fifty US dollars granted that's with the more expensive 240 Hertz cream let's conclude by looking at the good and bad aspects of the meta box NH 58 Rd while having decent specs to play basically any modern game with good settings the laptop has a clean and professional design without the typical gamer aesthetic the performance is quite impressive once you consider the fan noise it's below average it does get warm under stress test but in most games that seemed fine and the compromise was excellent performance likely thanks to the default minus 0.1 volt under volt that they've introduced in Australia this thing is serious value just for comparison that ISA Helios 300 with 16 60 Ti is at least 400 Australian dollars more money and this was outperforming it in many games I liked that the bulky including HDMI Ethernet and power found on the back of the machine and out of the way the i/o is otherwise pretty decent with SD card slot and type C port though USB 2.0 in 2019 is a bit odd and as is usually the case with these clever units no Thunderbolt 3 support the removable battery is also nice to have you could buy spares and very quickly swap in a fully charged one if you want which would be good as battery life was on the lower side there's not really much else to say overall I found it quite good for the price like the other Alpha X models I've covered this is easily one of the best clever units from meta box I've tested so far based on the specs overall performance and price I think the Alpha X series is offering great value for money especially here in Australia where bigger brands cost way more than they do in the US let me know your thoughts down in the comments and if you're new to the channel consider subscribing for future laptop reviews and tech videos like this one\n"