US Federal Judge Rules Google Has Illegal Monopoly on Internet Search and Advertising

In a recent ruling, US federal judge Ahmed Medha has declared that Google has an illegal monopoly on internet search and advertising. The decision comes as no surprise, given Google's dominant position in the search engine market. However, the specific circumstances surrounding Google's business practices have been deemed illegal by the court.

The big deal here is that a judge is saying the way Google conducts its business is actually breaking the law because it is illegal to act in a way that harms competition. This ruling has significant implications for the tech industry and highlights the government's efforts to regulate large corporations. The judge's decision also underscores the importance of fair competition in the market.

Google responded with a statement from Kent Walker, the company's president for Global Affairs. Walker stated that the company plans to appeal the decision, arguing that it recognizes Google offers the best search engine but concludes that they shouldn't be allowed to make it easily available. This stance reflects the company's commitment to innovation and competition, while also emphasizing its determination to protect its market position.

The Justice Department has also weighed in on the ruling, releasing a statement highlighting the evidence presented during the trial. According to the department, Google paid Apple and Samsung billions of dollars to secure its default search engine status on smartphones and phone browsers. This payment not only granted Google access to vast amounts of user data but also limited the ability of other search engines to compete.

The New York Times reported that Google paid Apple about $18 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine on iPhones, a staggering amount that highlights the significant financial influence Google wields over the tech industry. This payment is not just relevant to the search engine market but also extends to advertisements, where Google's dominance has been accused of running an illegal monopoly.

The lawsuit against Google was filed in 2020, and the trial took place last year, spanning a total of 10 weeks. The ruling marks a significant development in the case, with the judge declaring that Google violated the law. However, the decision is not without its complexities, as it sets a precedent for regulating large corporations in the tech industry.

The government's efforts to regulate big Tech giants have been gaining momentum in recent years. Earlier this year, the Justice Department sued Apple over how it makes it difficult for iPhone customers to leave the iPhone and switch to Android. The FTC has also taken action against Amazon, alleging that it blocks competition, while it has an ongoing lawsuit with Meta over how it accumulated a social media monopoly when it acquired Instagram and WhatsApp.

The current Google case is likely to be drawn out with appeals taking a while. One former chairman of the FTC told the New York Times that this could even head to the Supreme Court, indicating that the outcome may be far from certain. In light of this, it's essential for individuals to stay informed about the latest developments in the world of tech.

The court's decision has significant implications for the future of internet search and advertising. As the government continues to regulate the tech industry, companies like Google must adapt to new regulations and standards. The ruling also underscores the importance of fair competition in the market, ensuring that consumers have access to a diverse range of options.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: ena US federal judge ruled that Google has an illegal Monopoly on internet search and advertising now of course we all know Google is the largest search engine it's not a crime to have the most popular product that everyone uses however the big deal here is that a judge is saying the way Google conducts its business is actually breaking the law because it is illegal to act in a way that harms competition and this in part has to do with how Google pays companies like Apple and Samsung to make Google the default search engine on phones in his decision US District Judge Ahmed medha wrote quote after having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence the court reaches the following conclusion Google is a monopolist and it has acted as one to maintain its Monopoly Google responded with a statement from Kent Walker the company's president for Global Affairs who said the company does plan to appeal and Walker said quote this decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine but concludes that we shouldn't be allowed to make it easily available now the justice department also put out its own statement on the ruling in the trial the justice department pointed to how Google paid Apple and Samsung billions of dollars to make sure that Google was the default search engine on smart phones and phone browsers which then Google gets all this user data to grow stronger and stronger and the argument is that it makes it hard for other search engines to compete the New York Times reported Google paid Apple about $18 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine on iPhones and this isn't just about the search engine the government also accused Google of running an illegal Monopoly over the advertisements in its search results this whole ordeal has been stretched out the lawsuit was filed in 2020 the trial was last year and it took 10 weeks and now the judge ruled that Google violated the law so what's next well there's going to be another ruling perhaps coming on what the punishment or cure will need to be the court might say what Google needs to change to fix this illegal Monopoly Behavior it's been quite an error for the government going after big Tech Giants and their monopolies earlier this year the justice department sued Apple over how it makes it hard for iPhone customers to leave the iPhone and switch to Android that battle is still ongoing last year the FTC sued Amazon alleging that it blocks competition and the FTC also has an ongoing lawsuit with meta over how it accumulated a social media Monopoly when it acquired Instagram and WhatsApp and the agency is trying to break up the company the last time government really changed things by breaking piing up big Tech was back in the '90s when Microsoft was found to have an illegal Monopoly for how Internet Explorer was the dominant browser on Windows machines now that ended up stretching out for years and going to the US court of appeals for the District of Colombia where the US government and Microsoft reached a settlement and Microsoft agreed to make some changes now in this Google case you can expect it to be drawn out with appeals taking a while and one former chairman of the FTC told the New York Times that this could even head to the Supreme Court in other words you may be Googling this news for a while I'm Bridget KY if you want to follow updates on this you can also subscribe to our channel to stay up toate on the latest changes in the world of techa US federal judge ruled that Google has an illegal Monopoly on internet search and advertising now of course we all know Google is the largest search engine it's not a crime to have the most popular product that everyone uses however the big deal here is that a judge is saying the way Google conducts its business is actually breaking the law because it is illegal to act in a way that harms competition and this in part has to do with how Google pays companies like Apple and Samsung to make Google the default search engine on phones in his decision US District Judge Ahmed medha wrote quote after having carefully considered and weighed the witness testimony and evidence the court reaches the following conclusion Google is a monopolist and it has acted as one to maintain its Monopoly Google responded with a statement from Kent Walker the company's president for Global Affairs who said the company does plan to appeal and Walker said quote this decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine but concludes that we shouldn't be allowed to make it easily available now the justice department also put out its own statement on the ruling in the trial the justice department pointed to how Google paid Apple and Samsung billions of dollars to make sure that Google was the default search engine on smart phones and phone browsers which then Google gets all this user data to grow stronger and stronger and the argument is that it makes it hard for other search engines to compete the New York Times reported Google paid Apple about $18 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine on iPhones and this isn't just about the search engine the government also accused Google of running an illegal Monopoly over the advertisements in its search results this whole ordeal has been stretched out the lawsuit was filed in 2020 the trial was last year and it took 10 weeks and now the judge ruled that Google violated the law so what's next well there's going to be another ruling perhaps coming on what the punishment or cure will need to be the court might say what Google needs to change to fix this illegal Monopoly Behavior it's been quite an error for the government going after big Tech Giants and their monopolies earlier this year the justice department sued Apple over how it makes it hard for iPhone customers to leave the iPhone and switch to Android that battle is still ongoing last year the FTC sued Amazon alleging that it blocks competition and the FTC also has an ongoing lawsuit with meta over how it accumulated a social media Monopoly when it acquired Instagram and WhatsApp and the agency is trying to break up the company the last time government really changed things by breaking piing up big Tech was back in the '90s when Microsoft was found to have an illegal Monopoly for how Internet Explorer was the dominant browser on Windows machines now that ended up stretching out for years and going to the US court of appeals for the District of Colombia where the US government and Microsoft reached a settlement and Microsoft agreed to make some changes now in this Google case you can expect it to be drawn out with appeals taking a while and one former chairman of the FTC told the New York Times that this could even head to the Supreme Court in other words you may be Googling this news for a while I'm Bridget KY if you want to follow updates on this you can also subscribe to our channel to stay up toate on the latest changes in the world of tech\n"