**Outdoor Lighting Conditions: A Comparative Analysis of Camera Phones**
When it comes to capturing life's moments outdoors, camera phones play a crucial role. In this article, we will delve into the outdoor lighting conditions of two popular mid-range smartphones, the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 and the Samsung Galaxy M20.
In terms of outdoor lighting conditions, both cameras performed decently well. However, there was a noticeable color difference between the two devices. The contrast on the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 was better than that of the Samsung Galaxy M20. As seen in the image, the background of the picture taken with the Asus phone appears to be blown up compared to the Samsung device. Upon closer inspection, however, it becomes clear that the colors captured by both cameras are accurate.
**Color Accuracy and Contrast**
The Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2's camera excelled in terms of color accuracy and contrast, particularly when capturing the details of natural subjects such as plants. The colors produced by this camera were more vibrant and lifelike, making it easier to distinguish between different hues. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy M20 struggled to accurately capture the colors of the same subject.
**Human Subjects: Zoomed-In Images**
When it comes to capturing human subjects, especially when zooming in on a picture, the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2's camera took the lead. The camera's ability to produce sharp and detailed images made it easier to focus on specific features such as facial expressions. This was particularly evident when taking pictures of bouquets, where both cameras were shot in "Bouquet Mode." However, upon zooming in, the Asus phone produced a more vibrant and accurate image compared to its Samsung counterpart.
**Indoor Lighting Conditions: Artificial Lighting**
When it comes to indoor lighting conditions, such as artificial lighting, both cameras struggled to produce consistent results. The Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2's camera performed better in this regard, capturing images with less overexposure and more nuanced details. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy M20's camera often produced washed-out or overly bright images.
**Video Recording: Front-Facing Camera**
In terms of video recording, both cameras fared well. However, there was one notable exception - the front-facing camera on the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 struggled to produce good results in video recordings. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy M20's front-facing camera performed better, capturing more natural and lifelike images.
**Video Recording: Rear-Facing Camera**
When it comes to rear-facing camera video recording, both cameras produced decent results. However, the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 took a slight lead in terms of video quality. The camera was able to produce sharper and more detailed footage compared to its Samsung counterpart. Additionally, the camera's 4K video recording feature was not utilized due to limitations on the device.
**Video Recording: Front-Facing Camera (Comparison)**
To compare the front-facing cameras of both devices, a video recording was taken using each phone's front-facing camera. The results were starkly different - the Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2's front-facing camera produced poor results, while the Samsung Galaxy M20's performed well.
**Conclusion**
In conclusion, while both cameras performed well in outdoor lighting conditions, there are notable differences between them. The Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 excelled in terms of color accuracy and contrast, particularly when capturing natural subjects. However, its front-facing camera struggled to produce good results in video recordings. On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy M20's front-facing camera performed better, but its rear-facing camera struggled with artificial lighting conditions.
**Camera Comparison: A Summary**
The Asus Zenfone Max Pro M2 took a clear lead in terms of overall camera performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy M20. While both cameras had their strengths and weaknesses, the Asus phone excelled in key areas such as color accuracy and contrast, particularly when capturing natural subjects. However, its front-facing camera struggled with video recording.
**About the Author**
Ranjit is a tech enthusiast who has been following the latest developments in smartphone technology for years. With an in-depth understanding of both devices, Ranjit aims to provide readers with accurate and unbiased reviews of these mid-range smartphones.
**Disclaimer**
The opinions expressed in this article are those of Ranjit and do not reflect any affiliation or partnership between the author and the device manufacturers.