The Single Core was a bit higher so these results do make sense in the context of the clock speed of each chip here's a summary of all applications just tested on average over these 18 tests the 10th gen i7 107 10u was 5.2 percent faster than the 9th gen i7 9750h in both single and multi-core workloads at least when both had the same 45w tdp some of the results don't match what I was expecting for instance the warp stabilizer result at the bottom I expected the 107 monou to win that as it's a single core test likewise I assumed the cinebench r20 multi-core result would have done better on the 9750h given it has a higher all-core turbo boost speed let's investigate why the 107 10u was ahead of the 9750h in most of these cases

These are the average clock speeds of both cpus during one of the blender benchmarks we can see that the 9758 was around 400 megahertz lower over all six cores on average when compared to the 107 10u the 9750h was only able to match the clock speed with its higher power limit these are the values for cpu package power as reported by hardware info while the same blender test was running the 9750h is basically dead on its 45 watt limit as per the bottom bar then at the 60 watt limit once it's raised without issue the 107 10u on the other hand was actually averaging a little below its 45 watt limit at least in this specific test this is because of the thermals

the 107 10u was thermal throttling in the blender test as I mentioned earlier u-series chips are generally used in thinner and lighter machines and those typically have less cooling capacity this will of course vary between each laptop but in general you'll find the 9750h in thicker machines with bigger heatsinks and heat pipes to keep it running cooler despite thermal throttling in blender the 10710u was still completing the task faster and performing better

if we look at the total system power draw from the wall for the whole machine when under these same tests the results are even more interesting the 107 10u is using 20 more power than the 9750h in this exact same test however as we saw just before according to hardware info both were around their 45w tdp I'm not exactly sure what the deal is here the difference could simply be down to the changes in comet lake my 10th gen laptop was clearly using more power to achieve its higher performance as measured from the wall

the only change I noted in hardware info was that the 107 10u was reporting as using four more watts under ia cores anyway the 9750h machine needed far more power to maintain its 60 watt tdp in this same test and if you remember it was only just able to beat the 107 monou like this even if the software is reporting incorrectly or there's some other architecture difference causing this the 9750h needed more power from the wall to perform similarly in the blender test and achieve similar clock speeds

the fact that the 107 10u is competing at all with the 9750h honestly took me by surprise when I saw its cinebench performance when reviewing the msi prestige 15 i just knew i had to compare the two now most laptops with the 9750h will run the cpu higher than 45 watts when under cpu-only workloads like these but that's not always the case it will vary when both have the same power limit though

the 107 10u is also more likely to be lower in other laptops while the 9750h will pretty much always at least be capable of running at 45 watts i should also note that no under-volting was done here these are all stock results and memory for both machines was 16 gig in dual channel at ddr4 2666 unfortunately I'm not able to test gaming at this point as I had both laptops with completely different graphics the msi prestige 15 had the nvidia gtx 1650 max-q and i've never had that in another machine so can't fairly compare

pretty much all gaming laptops are based on the 9750h at the moment it'll be interesting if the 107 10u starts popping up in these otherwise for thinner and lighter machines with adequate cooling the new six core 10th gen comet lake cpu can perform quite well let me know which of these two cpus you'd pick and wired down in the comments and if you're new to the channel consider getting subscribed for future cpu comparisons and tech videos like this one

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enintel recently launched the new 10th gen u series cpus which for the first time includes a six core option so let's see how well this new chip compares with the six core 9th gen i7 9750h to help you decide which cpu you should get in your next laptop intel's i7 107 10u apart from having a lovely name is a 14 nanometer 10th generation cpu just to keep things confusing intel has both 14 nanometer and 10 nanometer cpus in their 10th gen lineup the 14 nanometer chips are branded as comet lake while the 10 nanometer are ice lake the ice lake cpus currently go up to 4 cores while the 107 10u is the first u-series chip that goes up to 6 cores u-series cpus are typically lower power parts for thinner and lighter notebooks so it will be interesting to see how this new 6-core compares with the popular 9750h let's look at the differences in specs between these two cpus both have 6 cores and 12 threads 12 meg of cash and are based on intel's 14 nanometer architecture the main difference is in the tdp the 9750h has a much higher 45 watt tdp while the 107 10u has a 15 watt tdp though this can be configured up to 25 watts by the laptop vendor if there's enough thermal and power headroom this difference in power is why the 10th gen cpu has a much lower base clock speed the single core turbo speed of the 10th gen chip is 200 megahertz faster than the 9750h however its all-core turbospeed when all six cores are utilized is 100 megahertz behind now here's the thing the performance of either of these cpus will in the end depend on the power limits that are defined by the laptop they're installed in for the i7 107 10u i'm testing the msi prestige 15 and when under a cpu-only workload it's capable of running up to 45 watts so the same tdp as the 9750h technically it can go to 50 and beyond but pl1 is 45 watts so this is where it settles this will not always be the case i haven't tested any other laptops with this 10th gen cpu yet but i suspect this could be a best case i've tested the i7 9750h both at its stock 45 watt limit which some laptops do actually adhere to but i'll also include results with the 9750h when the power limit has been raised to 60 watts as some of the laptops do this and that's the case with the clevo nh58rdq i'm testing with basically it's not as simple as comparing two cpus against each other as power limits can play a big role in this testing i have tested both the 10th gen 107 10u and 9th gen 9750h with the same 45w tdp so the results are about as comparable as we can get with that in mind let's get into those results starting with cinebench r20 i've got the 10th gen 107 10u cpu in the middle and the 9750h at the same 45 watts down the bottom the top result is the 9750h once it's been boosted up to 60 watts which is more representative of what it's typically capable of but as mentioned it will vary by laptop in this test the 10th gen cpu was 16 ahead of the 9750h and multicore and considering that both have the same 45 watt power limit this result surprised me when the 9750h is boosted to 60 watts though it's 8 percent faster than the 10th gen chip the 10th gen cpu was 11 percent faster when it came to single core this makes a bit more sense when we remember that it does have a higher single core turbo boost speed i've also tested cinebench r15 as many people still use it so the numbers can be used for comparison anyway the results are similar the 10th gen chip was ahead by nine percent in single core performance but a much lower 4.6 increase in multi-core again the 60 watt 9750h takes the lead by 7.7 percent in multi-core but was still behind in single core due to the highest single core turbo of the 107 10u i've run the bmw in classroom benchmarks with blender and despite being a heavy multi-core test the 10th gen cpu was again ahead of the 9750h when they both had the same 45w tdp the 107 10u completed the classroom test 10 faster and 12 percent faster for the bmw test with the 9750h set to a higher 60 watt power limit it's only just able to take the lead in this test i've used adobe premiere to export the same 4k laptop review and the 107 10u was completing the task 5 minutes faster than the 9750h interestingly there was no change to the 9750h even with the higher power limit i was only testing the cpu here gpu acceleration was disabled i've also used the warp stabilizer effect in adobe premiere which basically uses a single core to smooth out a clip interestingly the 10th gen cpu was behind here which i didn't expect considering it should have a higher single core turbo boost speed however the results were consistent handbrake was used to convert a 4k video file to 1080p and then a separate 1080p file to 720p with both chips at 45 watts the 107 10u was 10 faster at processing the 4k file however when it came to the 1080p to 720p conversion the 9750h was slightly ahead the v-ray benchmark uses the cpu to render out a scene and the 107 10u was 6.6 faster than the 9750h when at the same 45 watt power limit with the higher power limited 9750h though it's able to come out eight percent faster than the 10th gen cpu the corona benchmark also uses the cpu to render out a scene and there was a similar result here with the 107 10u completing the task 6.4 percent faster than the 9750h with the power limit on the 9750h boosted it's just able to claim the victory i've used 7-zip to test compression and decompression speeds and the 10th gen cpu was winning in both cases when it came to compression speed but was slightly behind in terms of decompression veracrypt was used to test aes encryption and decryption speeds this time the 10th gen cpu was behind in all instances though it was only by about two percent or so geekbench produced results a bit different to the other real applications the multi-core score was lower compared to the 9750h and the single core was a bit higher so these results do make sense in the context of the clock speed of each chip here's a summary of all applications just tested on average over these 18 tests the 10th gen i7 107 10u was 5.2 percent faster than the 9th gen i7 9750h in both single and multi-core workloads at least when both had the same 45w tdp some of the results don't match what i was expecting for instance the warp stabilizer result at the bottom i expected the 107 monou to win that as it's a single core test likewise i assumed the cinebench r20 multi-core result would have done better on the 9750h given it has a higher all-core turbo boost speed let's investigate why the 107 10u was ahead of the 9750h in most of these cases these are the average clock speeds of both cpus during one of the blender benchmarks we can see that the 9758 was around 400 megahertz lower over all six cores on average when compared to the 107 10u the 9750h was only able to match the clock speed with its higher power limit these are the values for cpu package power as reported by hardware info while the same blender test was running the 9750h is basically dead on its 45 watt limit as per the bottom bar then at the 60 watt limit once it's raised without issue the 107 10u on the other hand was actually averaging a little below its 45 watt limit at least in this specific test this is because of the thermals the 107 10u was thermal throttling in the blender test as i mentioned earlier u-series chips are generally used in thinner and lighter machines and those typically have less cooling capacity this will of course vary between each laptop but in general you'll find the 9750h in thicker machines with bigger heatsinks and heat pipes to keep it running cooler despite thermal throttling in blender the 10710u was still completing the task faster and performing better if we look at the total system power draw from the wall for the whole machine when under these same tests the results are even more interesting the 107 10u is using 20 more power than the 9750h in this exact same test however as we saw just before according to hardware info both were around their 45w tdp i'm not exactly sure what the deal is here the difference could simply be down to the changes in comet lake my 10th gen laptop was clearly using more power to achieve its higher performance as measured from the wall the only change i noted in hardware info was that the 107 10u was reporting as using four more watts under ia cores anyway the 9750h machine needed far more power to maintain its 60 watt tdp in this same test and if you remember it was only just able to beat the 107 monou like this even if the software is reporting incorrectly or there's some other architecture difference causing this the 9750h needed more power from the wall to perform similarly in the blender test and achieve similar clock speeds the fact that the 107 10u is competing at all with the 9750h honestly took me by surprise when i saw its cinebench performance when reviewing the msi prestige 15 i just knew i had to compare the two now most laptops with the 9750h will run the cpu higher than 45 watts when under cpu-only workloads like these but that's not always the case it will vary when both have the same power limit though the 10th gen chip appears to be in the lead the 107 10u is also more likely to be lower in other laptops while the 9750h will pretty much always at least be capable of running at 45 watts i should also note that no under-volting was done here these are all stock results and memory for both machines was 16 gig in dual channel at ddr4 2666. unfortunately i'm not able to test gaming at this point as i had both laptops with completely different graphics the msi prestige 15 had the nvidia gtx 1650 max-q and i've never had that in another machine so can't fairly compare pretty much all gaming laptops are based on the 9750h at the moment it'll be interesting if the 107 10u starts popping up in these otherwise for thinner and lighter machines with adequate cooling the new six core 10th gen comet lake cpu can perform quite well let me know which of these two cpus you'd pick and wired down in the comments and if you're new to the channel consider getting subscribed for future cpu comparisons and tech videos like this oneintel recently launched the new 10th gen u series cpus which for the first time includes a six core option so let's see how well this new chip compares with the six core 9th gen i7 9750h to help you decide which cpu you should get in your next laptop intel's i7 107 10u apart from having a lovely name is a 14 nanometer 10th generation cpu just to keep things confusing intel has both 14 nanometer and 10 nanometer cpus in their 10th gen lineup the 14 nanometer chips are branded as comet lake while the 10 nanometer are ice lake the ice lake cpus currently go up to 4 cores while the 107 10u is the first u-series chip that goes up to 6 cores u-series cpus are typically lower power parts for thinner and lighter notebooks so it will be interesting to see how this new 6-core compares with the popular 9750h let's look at the differences in specs between these two cpus both have 6 cores and 12 threads 12 meg of cash and are based on intel's 14 nanometer architecture the main difference is in the tdp the 9750h has a much higher 45 watt tdp while the 107 10u has a 15 watt tdp though this can be configured up to 25 watts by the laptop vendor if there's enough thermal and power headroom this difference in power is why the 10th gen cpu has a much lower base clock speed the single core turbo speed of the 10th gen chip is 200 megahertz faster than the 9750h however its all-core turbospeed when all six cores are utilized is 100 megahertz behind now here's the thing the performance of either of these cpus will in the end depend on the power limits that are defined by the laptop they're installed in for the i7 107 10u i'm testing the msi prestige 15 and when under a cpu-only workload it's capable of running up to 45 watts so the same tdp as the 9750h technically it can go to 50 and beyond but pl1 is 45 watts so this is where it settles this will not always be the case i haven't tested any other laptops with this 10th gen cpu yet but i suspect this could be a best case i've tested the i7 9750h both at its stock 45 watt limit which some laptops do actually adhere to but i'll also include results with the 9750h when the power limit has been raised to 60 watts as some of the laptops do this and that's the case with the clevo nh58rdq i'm testing with basically it's not as simple as comparing two cpus against each other as power limits can play a big role in this testing i have tested both the 10th gen 107 10u and 9th gen 9750h with the same 45w tdp so the results are about as comparable as we can get with that in mind let's get into those results starting with cinebench r20 i've got the 10th gen 107 10u cpu in the middle and the 9750h at the same 45 watts down the bottom the top result is the 9750h once it's been boosted up to 60 watts which is more representative of what it's typically capable of but as mentioned it will vary by laptop in this test the 10th gen cpu was 16 ahead of the 9750h and multicore and considering that both have the same 45 watt power limit this result surprised me when the 9750h is boosted to 60 watts though it's 8 percent faster than the 10th gen chip the 10th gen cpu was 11 percent faster when it came to single core this makes a bit more sense when we remember that it does have a higher single core turbo boost speed i've also tested cinebench r15 as many people still use it so the numbers can be used for comparison anyway the results are similar the 10th gen chip was ahead by nine percent in single core performance but a much lower 4.6 increase in multi-core again the 60 watt 9750h takes the lead by 7.7 percent in multi-core but was still behind in single core due to the highest single core turbo of the 107 10u i've run the bmw in classroom benchmarks with blender and despite being a heavy multi-core test the 10th gen cpu was again ahead of the 9750h when they both had the same 45w tdp the 107 10u completed the classroom test 10 faster and 12 percent faster for the bmw test with the 9750h set to a higher 60 watt power limit it's only just able to take the lead in this test i've used adobe premiere to export the same 4k laptop review and the 107 10u was completing the task 5 minutes faster than the 9750h interestingly there was no change to the 9750h even with the higher power limit i was only testing the cpu here gpu acceleration was disabled i've also used the warp stabilizer effect in adobe premiere which basically uses a single core to smooth out a clip interestingly the 10th gen cpu was behind here which i didn't expect considering it should have a higher single core turbo boost speed however the results were consistent handbrake was used to convert a 4k video file to 1080p and then a separate 1080p file to 720p with both chips at 45 watts the 107 10u was 10 faster at processing the 4k file however when it came to the 1080p to 720p conversion the 9750h was slightly ahead the v-ray benchmark uses the cpu to render out a scene and the 107 10u was 6.6 faster than the 9750h when at the same 45 watt power limit with the higher power limited 9750h though it's able to come out eight percent faster than the 10th gen cpu the corona benchmark also uses the cpu to render out a scene and there was a similar result here with the 107 10u completing the task 6.4 percent faster than the 9750h with the power limit on the 9750h boosted it's just able to claim the victory i've used 7-zip to test compression and decompression speeds and the 10th gen cpu was winning in both cases when it came to compression speed but was slightly behind in terms of decompression veracrypt was used to test aes encryption and decryption speeds this time the 10th gen cpu was behind in all instances though it was only by about two percent or so geekbench produced results a bit different to the other real applications the multi-core score was lower compared to the 9750h and the single core was a bit higher so these results do make sense in the context of the clock speed of each chip here's a summary of all applications just tested on average over these 18 tests the 10th gen i7 107 10u was 5.2 percent faster than the 9th gen i7 9750h in both single and multi-core workloads at least when both had the same 45w tdp some of the results don't match what i was expecting for instance the warp stabilizer result at the bottom i expected the 107 monou to win that as it's a single core test likewise i assumed the cinebench r20 multi-core result would have done better on the 9750h given it has a higher all-core turbo boost speed let's investigate why the 107 10u was ahead of the 9750h in most of these cases these are the average clock speeds of both cpus during one of the blender benchmarks we can see that the 9758 was around 400 megahertz lower over all six cores on average when compared to the 107 10u the 9750h was only able to match the clock speed with its higher power limit these are the values for cpu package power as reported by hardware info while the same blender test was running the 9750h is basically dead on its 45 watt limit as per the bottom bar then at the 60 watt limit once it's raised without issue the 107 10u on the other hand was actually averaging a little below its 45 watt limit at least in this specific test this is because of the thermals the 107 10u was thermal throttling in the blender test as i mentioned earlier u-series chips are generally used in thinner and lighter machines and those typically have less cooling capacity this will of course vary between each laptop but in general you'll find the 9750h in thicker machines with bigger heatsinks and heat pipes to keep it running cooler despite thermal throttling in blender the 10710u was still completing the task faster and performing better if we look at the total system power draw from the wall for the whole machine when under these same tests the results are even more interesting the 107 10u is using 20 more power than the 9750h in this exact same test however as we saw just before according to hardware info both were around their 45w tdp i'm not exactly sure what the deal is here the difference could simply be down to the changes in comet lake my 10th gen laptop was clearly using more power to achieve its higher performance as measured from the wall the only change i noted in hardware info was that the 107 10u was reporting as using four more watts under ia cores anyway the 9750h machine needed far more power to maintain its 60 watt tdp in this same test and if you remember it was only just able to beat the 107 monou like this even if the software is reporting incorrectly or there's some other architecture difference causing this the 9750h needed more power from the wall to perform similarly in the blender test and achieve similar clock speeds the fact that the 107 10u is competing at all with the 9750h honestly took me by surprise when i saw its cinebench performance when reviewing the msi prestige 15 i just knew i had to compare the two now most laptops with the 9750h will run the cpu higher than 45 watts when under cpu-only workloads like these but that's not always the case it will vary when both have the same power limit though the 10th gen chip appears to be in the lead the 107 10u is also more likely to be lower in other laptops while the 9750h will pretty much always at least be capable of running at 45 watts i should also note that no under-volting was done here these are all stock results and memory for both machines was 16 gig in dual channel at ddr4 2666. unfortunately i'm not able to test gaming at this point as i had both laptops with completely different graphics the msi prestige 15 had the nvidia gtx 1650 max-q and i've never had that in another machine so can't fairly compare pretty much all gaming laptops are based on the 9750h at the moment it'll be interesting if the 107 10u starts popping up in these otherwise for thinner and lighter machines with adequate cooling the new six core 10th gen comet lake cpu can perform quite well let me know which of these two cpus you'd pick and wired down in the comments and if you're new to the channel consider getting subscribed for future cpu comparisons and tech videos like this one\n"