**A Comparison of Intel 8300H and AMD 3750H Laptops: Which CPU Reigns Supreme?**

In this article, we'll delve into a detailed comparison of two laptops that boast impressive performance capabilities - the Intel 8300H and the AMD 3750H. Both laptops offer powerful processors that cater to various user needs, but which one emerges as the ultimate winner?

**Power Draw Comparison**

While it's essential to note the power draw for every single CPU testing, I didn't do that here, focusing instead on gaming tests. For the gaming tests, I'm using the Radeon RX Vega 10 graphics built into the Ryzen laptop and the UHD 630 graphics built into the Intel laptop. Neither of these provides an amazing gaming experience, but it's still crucial to see what we're getting in cases where discrete graphics aren't available.

In a 720p gameplay test with high settings, the Vega graphics delivered more than double the average frame rate, with a massive 136% improvement. This was playable and went well on Vega, although noticeably worse with Intel graphics. Similar results were observed in Fortnite at 720p with high settings, where the Vega graphics offered a huge 196% improvement in average FPS compared to Intel.

**Gaming Performance**

When it comes to gaming performance, both laptops show promise. In a CSGO test at 720p and all settings maxed out, the Vega graphics again came out far ahead, with a large 108% lead in average frame rate compared to Intel. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to properly test gaming differences using discrete graphics.

While my 8300H laptop has a GTX 1060, and my 3750H laptop boasts a GTX 1660 Ti, getting an 8300H laptop with the RTX 6600 Ti would be ideal, but that seems unlikely. The Intel 9th gen CPUs were released around the same time as the AMD Ryzen laptops, so it's unclear if there are any available.

**Thermal Performance**

I also haven't been able to test differences in thermal performance due to the distinct cooling solutions used by both laptops. While my 8300H system ran hot under heavy load, the 3750H was noticeably cooler. However, this will depend on the specific laptop and workload, as both Intel and AMD chips can vary in terms of temperature.

**Price Comparison**

The price difference between the two laptops is a bit hard to compare due to the release dates. The 8300H was released in Q2 2018, while the 3750H was released in Q1 2019. Moreover, the 8300H has already been replaced by the 90K300 H in Q2 2019, making it challenging to find examples of the same laptop with just different CPUs.

Furthermore, there are GPU differences to account for, which further affect prices. Unfortunately, I don't have good examples based purely on CPU specs, as both laptops require a new meeting between Intel and AMD at Computex.

**AMD's Current Laptop Offerings**

It's no secret that AMD's current laptop offerings for desktops are lacking, leading to the emergence of hybrid options like the FX 505D with an AMD CPU and NVIDIA GPU. In my previous review of the FX 505D, I noted that the 1% lows were lower compared to Intel options due to the weaker CPU, but when it came down to average performance, all games were playable at higher settings.

**Conclusion**

In conclusion, both laptops offer impressive performance capabilities, but with some caveats. The Intel 8300H is generally a superior CPU, with better raw performance in most applications, but it has a higher TDP, which uses more power and likely runs warmer. On the other hand, the AMD 3750H laptop offers a more budget-friendly option with decent performance, making it an attractive choice for those on a tighter budget.

Ultimately, the choice between these two laptops depends on the specific workload. For video editors using Adobe Premiere, the Intel CPU would see significant benefits, especially when using Quick Sync for exporting. If the laptop doesn't have discrete NVIDIA or AMD graphics, the Vega GPU in the 3750H will provide a better gaming experience.

**Which Laptop Do You Prefer?**

We'd love to hear from you! Which of these CPUs do you prefer in your next laptop? Let us know in the comments below. If you're new to our channel, be sure to get subscribed for future comparisons and tech videos like this one.

"WEBVTTKind: captionsLanguage: enit's the Battle of the quad-core laptop CPUs in this video I'll be comparing the AMD Verizon 737 50 H against the Intel i5 8300 H CPU to find out which is superior in a number of applications and games let's start off with the differences in specs before getting into the benchmarks both of these CPUs have four cores and eight threads both CPUs have the same 2.3 gigahertz base clock speed and they both have a maximum boost of 4 gigahertz however the Intel chip has a 45 watt TDP while the Verizon has a 35 watt TDP though that's not exactly an apples to apples comparison due to different architectures the Intel chip is using their 14 nanometer coffee-like architecture while the Rison is based on 12 nanometers and plus there's a cache difference to 4 megabytes for the risin ship while the Intel chip is doubled at 8 megabytes the last key difference between them is the memory support Verizon 737 50h supports dual channel memory at ddr4 2400 while the Intel i5 8300 H supports ddr4 2666 so the Intel platform has a slight advantage on the memory speeds as well alright with the specs out of the way let's check out the machines we're testing with for the Intel i5 8300 H I'm using my Lenovo y50 45 watt TDP limit while under CPU and lowered like some of the laptops do for the horizon 737 50 H I'm testing with the asou stuff FX 505 2 year and both laptops were tested with dual channel memory you can find links to my for reviews of each in pricing in the description let's start out with the classic Cinebench r15 because so many people are still so familiar with the scoring system in this test the Intel 8300 H is ahead in both single core and multi-core performance with an 11.6 percent lead for single core and a 6.7% lead for multi-core when compared to the horizon 37 50h don't worry I've got the newest Cinebench r20 results as well again the 8300 H was coming out ahead with a 3.8 percent higher single core score and eight percent higher multi-core score so not quite as high when compared to the older offif version shown previously let's look at something more practical well at least for me I use Adobe Premiere to create all of my videos and these are the export times for a 10-minute 1080p video you'll note that the 8300 H is ahead at the top but much farther ahead in the middle bar which has quick sync enabled Adobe Premiere is able to take advantage of this it's something until CPUs have had at the hardware level for years and does something premiere can't do with AMD CPUs at this time this gives a huge boost to the Intel CPU the result up the top is with the 8300 H and software only so no hardware acceleration just like the AMD CPU and even without quick sync we're seeing the 8300 H complete the task 37% faster than the 3750 H so video editors probably want a preference an Intel option I've also tested the warp stabiliser effect in Adobe Premiere basically it analyzes a piece of footage and smoothes it out and I believe it only uses a single CPU core in this case the Intel 8300 H was only completing the task 3.3 percent faster than the horizon 3758 nowhere near as big of a difference compared to exporting a video my blender tests were done using blench mark so the standard BMW and claustrum benchmarks the results were interesting this was one of the few tests where the 3758 was actually coming out ahead though the differences are quite small but it was completing the task a few seconds faster I ran this multiple times and got pretty much the same results under this workload the 8300 H was seeing more power limit throttling than other tests which resulted in lower clock speeds hence the closed results next up we'll look at some handbrake results I've converted one of my 4k video files to 1080p shown by the smaller lighter purple bars and a separate 1080p video file to 720p shown by the longer darker purple bars in both cases the 8300 H is faster than the 3750 H in terms of how many frames per second to persist 6.8% faster for the 4k file but then 14% quicker for the 1080p file I've used to the 7-zip benchmark to test compression and decompression speeds and while the 8300 H was a large 32.7% faster at compression the 3750 h scores a small win is about 4% faster when it comes to decompression much less of a difference between the two when it comes to decompression compared to the bigger compression difference learn so all around the 8300 H is looking like a more balanced option I've used veracrypt to test the AES encryption and decryption speeds and there was a much smaller difference between the two CPUs in this test the 8300 H was performing encryption operations just 2% faster and decryption 2.4 percent faster than the Verizon 737 50 H so it doesn't appear that it matters much which you pick for this workload the v-ray benchmark uses the CPU to render out a scene and in this specific workload there was a fairly large 19.5% higher score with the i5 8300 H CPU which was getting about 1,000 points higher in this test the corona benchmark also uses the CPU to render out a scene and with this test the 8300 H was 15% faster than the 3750 H I'm not personally a fan of Geekbench and don't usually use it however I had quite a few requests to add it in so here we are there was a 15 point 7 percent higher score with 8300 h4 the multi-core result and a similar fifteen point eight percent higher score when it came to single core performance when we combine the results of all of these tests the Intel i5 8300 H is around 17 percent faster than the AMD Rison 737 58 however we can see this is skewed quite a bit by the massive result up the top which was the Adobe Premiere export with quick sync while it's completely valid that Intel CPUs can complete these tasks significantly faster due to hardware acceleration that the software can take advantage of I've also got a graph showing the results without that one not everyone is a video editor and not everyone with an Intel CPU will use quick sinky though i think it doesn't work if you export with the to path setting for example anyway without the quick sink result on average the 8300 H is still 10% faster but it really depends on the specific workload the 37 50 H was ahead and decompression with 7-zip and just slightly faster in blender though it was very close before we get into the gaming results let's check out the powered roll I've measured the total system power draw from the wall so this is the entire laptop and not only the CPU however i've measured during the blender w benchmark so the CPU should be getting smashed additionally if you recall the blender results previously both machines actually completed the task in almost the same amount of time but despite this the 8380 laptop was consuming 20% more power higher power drawn the Intel CPU was expected due to its higher TDP plus there will be a difference with Intel's 14 nanometer architecture in AMD's 12 nanometers n plus this probably means we can expect more battery life out of a 37 50 H Machine due to the lower TDP and the lower power draw this isn't a perfect apples to apples comparison but the Lenovo y50 I'm using has a 3-cell 50 2.5 watt hour battery while the asou stuff FX 505 D you has a 3 cell 48 watt hour battery so the 8300 H machine is a little larger with the screen brightness on 50% keyboard lighting off and background apps disabled and just streaming YouTube videos the 3758 system lasted slightly longer despite having a smaller battery this could be down to the Vega graphics consuming less power than the Intel I GPU when streaming video I'm not certain but the 3758 machine lasted longer with a smaller battery and running the same task which looks like a plus to watch the Verizon chip while I could have improved the performance a little with the i5 8300 H by under bolting it I haven't done that here as I wanted to show real-world performance from an average laptop with this chip and you can't currently under vault the mobile AMD chips at the moment you could argue that that's an advantage of the Intel chip and I'd agree though I don't think most people buying laptops will be doing this it's more of an enthusiast thing for what it's worth I did run the blender test again with the under multiplied as I wanted to see if this would help reduce the power limit throttling that made both CPUs basically even in that test I only saw a few seconds difference though so in my specific case I don't think there's too much to gain but it would have caused vary by workload and probably even between different laptops with the same CPUs in most workloads under bolting should also see less overall power draw from the Intel system unless it's still hitting the power limit once under voltage which mine was doing in the blender test so I had no change in that workload to power draw either maybe in future I should note the power drawer for every single CPU testing however I didn't do that here for the gaming tests I'm using the Radeon rx Vega 10 graphics that are built into the rise in CPU and the UHD 630 graphics built into the Intel CPU neither of these are going to provide an amazing gaming experience but I think it's still important to see what we're getting in the cases where we may not have discrete graphics available where ever watch was tested at 720p with high settings and we're getting more than double the average frame rate with the Vega graphics or a massive 136 percent improvement pretty crazy it was actually playable and went well on Vega but noticeably worse those still usable with the Intel graphics similar deal in fortnight at 720p at high settings except this time there's a huge 196 percent improvement average FPS with the Vega graphics and even the 1% lower is far ahead of the average FPS that 8300 H was able to give us csgo was tested at 720p and all settings maxed out the Vega graphics were again coming out far ahead with a large 108 percent lead in average frame rate when compared to the Intel CPU unfortunately I haven't been able to properly test gaming differences here using discrete graphics my 8300 H laptop has a GTX 1060 while my 3750 H laptop has a gtx 1660 TI it would be nice if I could get a 8300 H laptop with the 16 60 TI but that seems unlikely as the Intel 9th gen CPUs came out around the same time I don't think there would be any even if there are I don't have any available to test with at the moment with that said I might compare these two machines and gaming in a future video if there's enough interest let me know but for the purposes of this CPU comparison it doesn't make sense I also haven't been able to test differences like thermals as both laptops have entirely different cooling solutions I can't do an apples-to-apples comparison there however you can see the temperatures in my full review videos linked in the description under heavy load I did note my 8300 each system was running hot up while the 3750 H ran noticeably cooler but yeah it'll really depend on the specific laptop and workload this is what I'd expect the Intel chips likely run hotter with their higher TDP more power equals more heat as for the difference in price it's a little hard to compare the 8300 H was released in q2 2018 while the 3750 H was released in q1 2019 the 8300 H has already been replaced by the 90 300 H in q2 2019 so I haven't been able to find good examples of the same laptop with just different CPUs not only that but there are also GPU differences to account for which further affect prices so unfortunately I don't have good examples based purely on a meeting they had with a laptop company at Computex Intel CPUs do cost them more money to buy which is likely why we're starting to see these AMD chips and to the more budget-friendly mid-range machines it's no secret that AMD's current radio and offerings for laptops are lacking so it's not surprising we're starting to see hybrid options like the FX 505 D you with AMD CPU and NVIDIA GPU yes as we saw in my sous FX 505 D you gain benchmarks the 1% lows are lower compared to Intel options as the CPU is weaker however when it came down to it the averages was still good and all games were playable at higher settings which I think matters more than numbers on the graph so while the 8300 H is in general a superior CPU it has a higher TDP so uses more power likely runs warmer and possibly costs more money the 3750 H is quite capable and if it gives us a loyal customer Sheen's then it's good to have that option available but personally I'm hoping AMD success on the desktop side starts trickling over to the laptop side more in the future as having more options available benefits everyone as for what you should choose it depends on the specific work load for example video editors using Adobe Premiere would see very nice benefits with the Intel CPU especially if using quick sync when exporting if the laptop has no discrete Nvidia or AMD graphics then the Vega GPU in the 3750 H is going to give a much better experience than the Intel 8300 H in gaming and the Verizon chip may also see better battery but in terms of raw performance in most applications the 8300 H is the clear winner let me know which of these CPUs you pick in your NEX laptop and wired down in the comments and if you're new to the channel get subscribed for future comparisons and tech videos like this oneit's the Battle of the quad-core laptop CPUs in this video I'll be comparing the AMD Verizon 737 50 H against the Intel i5 8300 H CPU to find out which is superior in a number of applications and games let's start off with the differences in specs before getting into the benchmarks both of these CPUs have four cores and eight threads both CPUs have the same 2.3 gigahertz base clock speed and they both have a maximum boost of 4 gigahertz however the Intel chip has a 45 watt TDP while the Verizon has a 35 watt TDP though that's not exactly an apples to apples comparison due to different architectures the Intel chip is using their 14 nanometer coffee-like architecture while the Rison is based on 12 nanometers and plus there's a cache difference to 4 megabytes for the risin ship while the Intel chip is doubled at 8 megabytes the last key difference between them is the memory support Verizon 737 50h supports dual channel memory at ddr4 2400 while the Intel i5 8300 H supports ddr4 2666 so the Intel platform has a slight advantage on the memory speeds as well alright with the specs out of the way let's check out the machines we're testing with for the Intel i5 8300 H I'm using my Lenovo y50 45 watt TDP limit while under CPU and lowered like some of the laptops do for the horizon 737 50 H I'm testing with the asou stuff FX 505 2 year and both laptops were tested with dual channel memory you can find links to my for reviews of each in pricing in the description let's start out with the classic Cinebench r15 because so many people are still so familiar with the scoring system in this test the Intel 8300 H is ahead in both single core and multi-core performance with an 11.6 percent lead for single core and a 6.7% lead for multi-core when compared to the horizon 37 50h don't worry I've got the newest Cinebench r20 results as well again the 8300 H was coming out ahead with a 3.8 percent higher single core score and eight percent higher multi-core score so not quite as high when compared to the older offif version shown previously let's look at something more practical well at least for me I use Adobe Premiere to create all of my videos and these are the export times for a 10-minute 1080p video you'll note that the 8300 H is ahead at the top but much farther ahead in the middle bar which has quick sync enabled Adobe Premiere is able to take advantage of this it's something until CPUs have had at the hardware level for years and does something premiere can't do with AMD CPUs at this time this gives a huge boost to the Intel CPU the result up the top is with the 8300 H and software only so no hardware acceleration just like the AMD CPU and even without quick sync we're seeing the 8300 H complete the task 37% faster than the 3750 H so video editors probably want a preference an Intel option I've also tested the warp stabiliser effect in Adobe Premiere basically it analyzes a piece of footage and smoothes it out and I believe it only uses a single CPU core in this case the Intel 8300 H was only completing the task 3.3 percent faster than the horizon 3758 nowhere near as big of a difference compared to exporting a video my blender tests were done using blench mark so the standard BMW and claustrum benchmarks the results were interesting this was one of the few tests where the 3758 was actually coming out ahead though the differences are quite small but it was completing the task a few seconds faster I ran this multiple times and got pretty much the same results under this workload the 8300 H was seeing more power limit throttling than other tests which resulted in lower clock speeds hence the closed results next up we'll look at some handbrake results I've converted one of my 4k video files to 1080p shown by the smaller lighter purple bars and a separate 1080p video file to 720p shown by the longer darker purple bars in both cases the 8300 H is faster than the 3750 H in terms of how many frames per second to persist 6.8% faster for the 4k file but then 14% quicker for the 1080p file I've used to the 7-zip benchmark to test compression and decompression speeds and while the 8300 H was a large 32.7% faster at compression the 3750 h scores a small win is about 4% faster when it comes to decompression much less of a difference between the two when it comes to decompression compared to the bigger compression difference learn so all around the 8300 H is looking like a more balanced option I've used veracrypt to test the AES encryption and decryption speeds and there was a much smaller difference between the two CPUs in this test the 8300 H was performing encryption operations just 2% faster and decryption 2.4 percent faster than the Verizon 737 50 H so it doesn't appear that it matters much which you pick for this workload the v-ray benchmark uses the CPU to render out a scene and in this specific workload there was a fairly large 19.5% higher score with the i5 8300 H CPU which was getting about 1,000 points higher in this test the corona benchmark also uses the CPU to render out a scene and with this test the 8300 H was 15% faster than the 3750 H I'm not personally a fan of Geekbench and don't usually use it however I had quite a few requests to add it in so here we are there was a 15 point 7 percent higher score with 8300 h4 the multi-core result and a similar fifteen point eight percent higher score when it came to single core performance when we combine the results of all of these tests the Intel i5 8300 H is around 17 percent faster than the AMD Rison 737 58 however we can see this is skewed quite a bit by the massive result up the top which was the Adobe Premiere export with quick sync while it's completely valid that Intel CPUs can complete these tasks significantly faster due to hardware acceleration that the software can take advantage of I've also got a graph showing the results without that one not everyone is a video editor and not everyone with an Intel CPU will use quick sinky though i think it doesn't work if you export with the to path setting for example anyway without the quick sink result on average the 8300 H is still 10% faster but it really depends on the specific workload the 37 50 H was ahead and decompression with 7-zip and just slightly faster in blender though it was very close before we get into the gaming results let's check out the powered roll I've measured the total system power draw from the wall so this is the entire laptop and not only the CPU however i've measured during the blender w benchmark so the CPU should be getting smashed additionally if you recall the blender results previously both machines actually completed the task in almost the same amount of time but despite this the 8380 laptop was consuming 20% more power higher power drawn the Intel CPU was expected due to its higher TDP plus there will be a difference with Intel's 14 nanometer architecture in AMD's 12 nanometers n plus this probably means we can expect more battery life out of a 37 50 H Machine due to the lower TDP and the lower power draw this isn't a perfect apples to apples comparison but the Lenovo y50 I'm using has a 3-cell 50 2.5 watt hour battery while the asou stuff FX 505 D you has a 3 cell 48 watt hour battery so the 8300 H machine is a little larger with the screen brightness on 50% keyboard lighting off and background apps disabled and just streaming YouTube videos the 3758 system lasted slightly longer despite having a smaller battery this could be down to the Vega graphics consuming less power than the Intel I GPU when streaming video I'm not certain but the 3758 machine lasted longer with a smaller battery and running the same task which looks like a plus to watch the Verizon chip while I could have improved the performance a little with the i5 8300 H by under bolting it I haven't done that here as I wanted to show real-world performance from an average laptop with this chip and you can't currently under vault the mobile AMD chips at the moment you could argue that that's an advantage of the Intel chip and I'd agree though I don't think most people buying laptops will be doing this it's more of an enthusiast thing for what it's worth I did run the blender test again with the under multiplied as I wanted to see if this would help reduce the power limit throttling that made both CPUs basically even in that test I only saw a few seconds difference though so in my specific case I don't think there's too much to gain but it would have caused vary by workload and probably even between different laptops with the same CPUs in most workloads under bolting should also see less overall power draw from the Intel system unless it's still hitting the power limit once under voltage which mine was doing in the blender test so I had no change in that workload to power draw either maybe in future I should note the power drawer for every single CPU testing however I didn't do that here for the gaming tests I'm using the Radeon rx Vega 10 graphics that are built into the rise in CPU and the UHD 630 graphics built into the Intel CPU neither of these are going to provide an amazing gaming experience but I think it's still important to see what we're getting in the cases where we may not have discrete graphics available where ever watch was tested at 720p with high settings and we're getting more than double the average frame rate with the Vega graphics or a massive 136 percent improvement pretty crazy it was actually playable and went well on Vega but noticeably worse those still usable with the Intel graphics similar deal in fortnight at 720p at high settings except this time there's a huge 196 percent improvement average FPS with the Vega graphics and even the 1% lower is far ahead of the average FPS that 8300 H was able to give us csgo was tested at 720p and all settings maxed out the Vega graphics were again coming out far ahead with a large 108 percent lead in average frame rate when compared to the Intel CPU unfortunately I haven't been able to properly test gaming differences here using discrete graphics my 8300 H laptop has a GTX 1060 while my 3750 H laptop has a gtx 1660 TI it would be nice if I could get a 8300 H laptop with the 16 60 TI but that seems unlikely as the Intel 9th gen CPUs came out around the same time I don't think there would be any even if there are I don't have any available to test with at the moment with that said I might compare these two machines and gaming in a future video if there's enough interest let me know but for the purposes of this CPU comparison it doesn't make sense I also haven't been able to test differences like thermals as both laptops have entirely different cooling solutions I can't do an apples-to-apples comparison there however you can see the temperatures in my full review videos linked in the description under heavy load I did note my 8300 each system was running hot up while the 3750 H ran noticeably cooler but yeah it'll really depend on the specific laptop and workload this is what I'd expect the Intel chips likely run hotter with their higher TDP more power equals more heat as for the difference in price it's a little hard to compare the 8300 H was released in q2 2018 while the 3750 H was released in q1 2019 the 8300 H has already been replaced by the 90 300 H in q2 2019 so I haven't been able to find good examples of the same laptop with just different CPUs not only that but there are also GPU differences to account for which further affect prices so unfortunately I don't have good examples based purely on a meeting they had with a laptop company at Computex Intel CPUs do cost them more money to buy which is likely why we're starting to see these AMD chips and to the more budget-friendly mid-range machines it's no secret that AMD's current radio and offerings for laptops are lacking so it's not surprising we're starting to see hybrid options like the FX 505 D you with AMD CPU and NVIDIA GPU yes as we saw in my sous FX 505 D you gain benchmarks the 1% lows are lower compared to Intel options as the CPU is weaker however when it came down to it the averages was still good and all games were playable at higher settings which I think matters more than numbers on the graph so while the 8300 H is in general a superior CPU it has a higher TDP so uses more power likely runs warmer and possibly costs more money the 3750 H is quite capable and if it gives us a loyal customer Sheen's then it's good to have that option available but personally I'm hoping AMD success on the desktop side starts trickling over to the laptop side more in the future as having more options available benefits everyone as for what you should choose it depends on the specific work load for example video editors using Adobe Premiere would see very nice benefits with the Intel CPU especially if using quick sync when exporting if the laptop has no discrete Nvidia or AMD graphics then the Vega GPU in the 3750 H is going to give a much better experience than the Intel 8300 H in gaming and the Verizon chip may also see better battery but in terms of raw performance in most applications the 8300 H is the clear winner let me know which of these CPUs you pick in your NEX laptop and wired down in the comments and if you're new to the channel get subscribed for future comparisons and tech videos like this one\n"